1. <month year>
doc: IEEE c
July 2005
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [60 GHz Indoor Channel Modeling Results ]
Date Submitted: [July 2005]
Source: [Shahriar Emami, Brian Gaucher, Abbie Mathew and Zhiguo Lai]
Company [Freescale Semiconductor Inc., IBM Research, Newlans Inc. and University of Massachusetts, Amherst]
Address
[Freescale Semiconductor, 6100 Broken Sound Pkwy., N.W. Suite 1, Boca Raton, FL  ]
[IBM Research, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598]
[University of Massachusetts, Department of ECE, Amherst, MA ]
Abstract: [Summarizes 60 GHz channel modeling simulation work]
Purpose: [To update task group on channel modeling simulation work]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
S. Emami, Freescale
<author>, <company>

2. IBM Channel Model and Measurements
July 2005
IBM Channel Model and Measurements
Zwick, Beukema and Nam Introduce a mmw channel model. Model was verified with measurements.
Path loss and small scale statistics are captured by the model.
Small scale fading model has two component, namely an exponential inter-arrivals and Rayleigh like envelope.
We wish to reproduce their results.
S. Emami, Freescale

3. July 2005
Realizations
S. Emami, Freescale

4. July 2005
RMS Delay Samples
S. Emami, Freescale

5. July 2005
CDF of RMS Delay
S. Emami, Freescale

6. July 2005
PDP
S. Emami, Freescale

7. Summary Reproduced the model proposed by Zwick et. al.
July 2005
Summary
Reproduced the model proposed by Zwick et. al.
Model parameters for only one environment (office environment) is provided.
There is a good match between PDPs and estimated RMS delays.
S. Emami, Freescale