Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNadine Gudrun Frank Modified over 6 years ago
1
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 387-393 (February 1999)
Altered adrenergic responsiveness of endothelium-denuded hepatic arteries and portal veins in patients with cirrhosis Jörg Heller*, Michael Schepke*, Nina Gehnen*, Gerhard J. Molderings‡, Andreas Müller§, Jochen Erhard∥, Ulrich Spengler*, Tilman Sauerbruch* Gastroenterology Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999) DOI: /S (99) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Cumulative concentration-response curves to methoxamine (10−8 to 10−3 mol/L) in isolated, endothelium-denuded hepatic artery rings of patients with cirrhosis (●) and organ donors (○). Contractions by methoxamine are expressed as the percentage of the contraction induced by 85 mmol/L KCl. Each point represents the mean ± SEM. In some cases, SEM is less than the size of the symbols. The curves to the data are significantly different (P < ; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences of the corresponding observed contractile responses at the different methoxamine concentrations between patients with cirrhosis and organ donors are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t test for unpaired data). Gastroenterology , DOI: ( /S (99) ) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Cumulative concentration-response curves to methoxamine (10−8 to 10−3 mol/L) in isolated, endothelium-denuded portal vein rings of patients with cirrhosis (●) and organ donors (○). Contractions by methoxamine are expressed as the percentage of the contraction induced by 85 mmol/L KCl. Each point represents the mean ± SEM. In some cases, SEM is less than the size of the symbols. The curves to the data are significantly different (P < ; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences of the corresponding observed contractile responses at the different methoxamine concentrations between patients with cirrhosis and organ donors are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t test for unpaired data). Gastroenterology , DOI: ( /S (99) ) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Cumulative concentration-response curves to isoproterenol (10−8 to 10−3 mol/L) in isolated, endothelium-denuded hepatic artery rings of patients with cirrhosis (●) and organ donors (○). Vessels were precontracted by 40 mmol/L KCl. Relaxations induced by isoproterenol are expressed as the percentage of the reduction in vascular tone induced by papaverine (100 μmol/L). Each point represents the mean ± SEM. In some cases, SEM is less than the size of the symbols. The curves to the data are significantly different (P < ; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences of the corresponding observed relaxing responses at the different isoproterenol concentrations between patients with cirrhosis and organ donors are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t test for unpaired data). Gastroenterology , DOI: ( /S (99) ) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
5
Fig. 4 Cumulative concentration-response curves to isoproterenol (10−8 to 10−3 mol/L) in isolated, endothelium-denuded portal vein rings of patients with cirrhosis (●) and organ donors (○). Vessels were precontracted by 40 mmol/L KCl. Relaxations induced by isoproterenol are expressed as the percentage of the reduction in vascular tone induced by papaverine (100 μmol/L). Each point represents the mean ± SEM. In some cases, SEM is less than the size of the symbols. The curves to the data are significantly different (P < ; two-way ANOVA). Significant differences of the corresponding observed relaxing responses at the different isoproterenol concentrations between patients with cirrhosis and organ donors are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t test for unpaired data). Gastroenterology , DOI: ( /S (99) ) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.