1. Student Growth and Performance Update:
A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts
An Overview of Local LEA Data:
Conneaut Area Schools, NE Region
Winter 2013

2. Ohio RttT/Non-RttT Cohorts
# OHIO Students
RttT
Non-RttT
Public Districts
610
285
325
Enrollment
1,637,299
55%
45%
Poverty
704, 209
62%
38%
Minority
332,388
77%
23%
Minority (excludes large urban districts)
200,122
Student with Disabilities (SWD)
218,497
59%
41%
What do you notice about the differences in cohorts? Please keep such differences in mind as we continue to explore existing data.

3. District Demographics
Type 4 (Small town with high student poverty and average student population)
1,799 Enrollment
$24,145 Median Income
62.7% Poverty
8.5% Minority population
16.7% Students with Disabilities

4. Performance Index Gain of 2
Performance Index Gain of 2.4 RttT & Non-RttT Districts (3-year average before RttT and LRC)
The data we are looking at here reflects a 2.4 PI gain for both RttT and Non-RttT districts when comparing current Performance Index with the 3 year average for the years leading up to RttT participation.
There is no difference in the PI gains when comparing RttT with Non-RttT; but again, keep in mind the demographics of RttT and Non-RttT districts

5. District Performance Index Gain/Loss
Three-year Average before RttT (08-10 LRC) 92.73
Performance Index LRC
94.9
Gain/Loss
gain

6. RttT, Non-RttT & District Performance Index Gain (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

7. Percent of RttT vs Non-RttT Districts Adding More than 1 Year’s Growth
These data reflect that 56% of Ohio RttT public school districts added MORE THAN one year’s growth as reported on the LRC. That compares to 53% of Non-RttT

8. Gifted Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts Adding More than 1 year's Growth
26% of RttT districts added more than one year’s growth for their gifted population compared to 19% of Non-RttT districts

9. SWD Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth ( LRC)
These data reflect that 32% of RttT public school districts added more than one year’s growth for their population of SWD as reported on the current LRC. Non-RttT districts did slightly better with their SWD population

10. Value Added - Lowest 20% (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth LRC
And when you look at the lowest quintile of achievement; the lowest 20%) 33% of RttT districts added more than one year’s growth compared to 28% of Non-RttT districts.

11. Value Added Growth – District A = 2 or more year’s growth B = 1 year of growth, but less than 2 C = Greater or equal to -1 but less than +1 D = Greater or equal to -2 but less than -1 F = Less than -2
F - Overall
C - Gifted
C - Students With Disabilities
A - Lowest 20%

12. District Performance compared to All Ohio Districts
Letter Grade All OH 610 Districts
Overall
Percent of Districts
Gifted
SWD
Lowest 20% A 46 10 16 14 B 8 12 17 C 45 42 49 D F 23 13 6 NR 2
The highlighted areas shows how your district fell in relationship to the rest of the state.

13. RttT/Non-RttT 3rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient (3-year average before RttT and LRC)

14. District - 3rd Grade Reading
77.3% Three-year average before RttT Percent at or above Proficient
83.6% LRC
6.3 % Gain

15. 3rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

16. RttT/Non-RttT 4-Year Average Graduation Rate
The 2012 RttT 4 year graduation rate improved by 3.7% over the 2010 rate
This compares to a 2.4 % improvement by Non-RttT districts
The data is 1 year behind thus accounting for no 2013 data

17. District Graduation Rate (4 Year)
2010 Rate 82.3% (“On-time”)
2012 Rate 83.1% (4-Year Longitudinal)
Gain or Loss: %

18. RttT, Non-RttT & District Graduation Rates