Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning
Lesson 8
2
Associative Learning & Language
Language acquisition Interaction of nature & nurture Respondent & operant Respondent Association of sounds & symbols English: “deh” = d; “err” = r Russian: “deh” = д; “err” = р ~
3
Respondent Learning & Language
Associatе sounds/symbols with objects/actions English: dog; woman; speak Spanish: perro; mujer; hablar Russian: собака; женщина, говорить Words/ideas Conditional stimuli Conditional responses ~
4
Operant Learning & Language
Babies start off babbling sounds Inherited behavior Certain sounds are reinforced Directly by parents, etc. Also by consequences words are understood consequences Mother ~
5
Respondent & Operant Together
SD B SR : UR CS : US CR
6
Respondent vs Operant Both associative Involuntary vs voluntary
Biologically important events US vs SR Signals/cues CS vs SD Contingency CS : US vs B SR ~
7
Factors Influencing Acquisition
Frequency # learning trials Predictivity contingency & probability Contiguity timing Salience Intensity / novelty ~
8
Acquisition: Frequency
Gradual usually requires many pairings Respondent: CS : US UR Operant: SD : B SR Measuring the learned response magnitude latency / probability / frequency Asymptote limit to how much can be learned ~
9
Respondent Acquisition
CS : US UR CR Hi Lo Asymptote CR Strength CS : US pairings
10
Operant Acquisition SD : B SR Hi Asymptote Bar Press Rate (B) Lo
B SR Trials
11
Detour Learning Task
12
Acquisition: Detour Learning
Chicks performance on detour learning task
13
Acquisition: Predictivity
Contingency CS+ / CS- SD / S∆ Probability Usefulness of cues Hi faster learning Low slower learning ~
14
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
Order & Timing Anticipate important event strongest to weakest CR Delayed CS US Trace CS US
15
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
Simultaneous CS US Backward CS US
16
Contiguity: Respondent Learning
CS-US interval In general... shorter interval more effective longer interval less effective Depends on response system Fast: seconds) e.g., eye blink, skeletal muscle reflexes Slow: 2-3 min e.g., CERs, physiological responses Nausea (CTA): hours ~
17
Contiguity: Operant Learning
Delay of Reinforcement Immediate consequences most effective temporal contiguity reinforcement & punishment longer delays: probability of other behaviors being reinforced instead of intended behavior ~
18
Delay of Reinforcement
20 15 Bar presses per minute 10 5 Delay between B and SR (sec)
19
Salience: Operant Learning
SD / S∆ intensity More noticeable faster learning SR intensity Magnitude of reinforcement magnitude faster learning SR value value faster learning Can be modified by experience ~
20
Operant: Delay vs Magnitude
Delay most important factor Small, immediate reinforcer more powerful… Than large, delayed reward Immediate consequences More closely connected to situation e.g., hangovers as punishment ~
21
Salience: CS Intensity
Faster conditioning CR Hi Lo # of CS - US pairings Asymptote stronger CS weaker CS
22
Salience: CS Intensity
Stimulus millieu Always multiple potential CSs Overshadowing Concurrent cues TONE/light – shock pain/fear TONE stronger fear light weaker fear ~
23
Salience: US Intensity
Increased intensity Faster conditioning and… Stronger CR possible Raise Asymptote
24
Salience: US Intensity
Hi stronger US Asymptote CR weaker US Lo # of CS - US pairings
25
Salience & Previous Experience
Surprisingness of US important Affects rapidity & strength of learning Novel stimuli best cues CS+ / CS- and SD / S∆ Not cues for other only occur with US/SR ~
26
Salience & Previous Experience
Latent Inhibition Slower acquisition if CS is familiar Cues associated w/ other events Inhibits association w/ new US/SR Blocking effect Tone—shock pain/fear Tone fear Tone/Light – shock pain/fear Light no fear (or weak) Redundancy ~
27
Sensory Preconditioning
Conditional Stimuli paired first no US many times Acquisition one CS is paired with a US other is not Extinction of CS paired with US ~
28
Conditioned Taste Aversion (CTA)
Exception to usual rules of conditioning Delay can be hours Requires only single CS-US pairing Rats: novel food makes them sick Will avoid that food, even if starving Adaptive ? Stewed tomatoes & beef jerky ~
29
Conditioned Taste Aversions
Learn to avoid foods that make you sick Eat a novel food Taste = CS Become sick Avoid food Resistant to extinction Species specific tendencies Mammals: Taste cues (CS) Birds: Visual cues ~
30
Biological Preparedness
Animals differentially prepared to associate certain CSs & USs Highly prepared learn very quickly Unprepared according to general learning laws Contraprepared great difficulty, if at all even w/ appropriate contingencies ~
31
Stimulus Relevance Cues relevant for biologically important event
both taste & illness for food visual cues & painful stimuli highly-prepared associations Contra-prepared or unprepared for others Taste – foot shock Sound/light -- illness ~
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.