1. Summer Camp 2010 SRA 2010 Status update
Laila Gide and Tatu Koljonen

2. Vision and high level targets
Market & Investing in ES Research
Research Priorities
Prepare the future
Innovation
eco-system

3. THE MOVE….
ARTEMIS focus on the “system” aspect of embedded systems- “System” that includes HW and SW integrating physical to “virtual”
ARTEMIS builds on a new cross-domain approach to support a variety of applications, services and solutions for societal challenges ( THE BUBBLES)
Achieve a paradigm change : big impact and quick to market challenge

4. WHY? Build on SRA 2006 Strategy and revisit to cover new concerns:
Societal challenges adds a third dimension the “Matrix approach”
“Horizontal” components:
Reference Design and Architecture (RDA)
Seamless connectivity and interoperability (SCI) [ instead of SMC]
Design Methods and Tools (DMT)
“Vertical” components
Application contexts needs to be up-dated

5. And … New Opportunities , New Challenges
Mega trends = new opportunities
Healthcare & Ageing society,
Greener everything: Green, safe and supportive transportation,
Sustainable environment, energy and resources management, ..
Smart buildings and cities of the future
And many others…

6. SRA 2010 “key messages”
Embedded Systems ( ES) are essential for digitalisation of everyday life.
Revisiting the examples described in the SRA 2006
ES forms the interface between physical and virtual world (core part cyber-physical world).
Where Europe is leading
Example: strong back-ground in the automotive and machinery equipment – danger in loosing market position if advance in certification of ES is not kept.
Example: Europe is lagging in the IT systems, and therefore should invest more and better in the ES : get figures from the German national roadmap on ES ( NRMES)
Europe is investing in ES that are answering application fields needs.
Bringing Embedded Systems to other technical areas creates competitive advantages (due to our leading position in ES)
Cloud computing: ES is the interface between the Cloud computing world and the physical world . Trade off between ES and Cloud computing particularly for energy consumption
Link the societal challenges to technical challenges for the ES such as:
Energy awareness and limited power consumption for systems
Ease of use versus complexity,
Always connected
Safety and Security (built-in trust)

7. SRA 2010 “key messages” Market push/Technology pull
Digitalisation of the physical environment
Energy awareness and limited power consumption for systems
Ease of use versus complexity,
Always connected and interconnected: “Internet of Things”
Safety and Security (built-in trust)

8. Positioning Positioning with respect to:
FP7 and Eureka and National programmes
ENIAC
New PPPs : Factory of the Future, Energy efficient buildings, Green Cars and the Future Internet
EIT ICT labs
other ETPs : e.g EPOSS

9. Positioning Short, medium, long term in ES
What is the benefit for participating company?
FP7
Artemis-JU
Eureka
Nat.
Increasing knowledge and development of technology
long ?
Creating new value chains ?
mid
Improvement on existing value chain ?
short
problem areas?

10. Positioning EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS

11. Positioning ELEMENTS OF EIT ICT LABS
Central organization ESB, CEO, CFO, CSO, ERI-Coordinators, Node Managers, offices, travel cost, communication
Co-Location Berlin
Co-Location Eindhoven
Co-Location Helsinki
Co-Location Paris
Co-Location Stockholm
Thematic areas with focus on delivering innovation to market
ERI-Horizontal activities with activities addressing needs of all thematic areas
A Thematic Area …
Has an application area with a long-term business objective
integrates research, innovation and education
has clear leadership, possibly assigned to a node
must be European-wide
integrates relevant technological competencies
has a Strategic Ambition which includes a clear vision and a measurable objective
Smart spaces
Smart energy systems
Health & well-being
Intelli-gent trans-por-tation Systems
Future media and content delivery
Education
Research
Innovation
Bubble size represents the budget of the activity

12. WHAT EIT ICT Labs OFFERS TO OUR PARTNERS?
An open window to our Node and to the whole KIC-network:
Access to people. You are part of a network engaging the best students and connecting to researchers from other nodes. Some students may be interested in joining your organization afterwards.
The role of "partner of choice" for our various EU-funded activities in Research, Education and Innovation
Access to our research infrastructure and facilities, also at other nodes. There will be space provided for working together, opportunities to meet with company and academia people. The Helsinki facility will at the start be situated in the TUAS building in Otaniemi.
Match making with various partners in our innovation chains
Access to a global partner network. For example, you can plan new educational or research activities (e.g. EU FP7/FP8 projects) together and enhance the chances to get funding if they are EIT-branded
Internationalization of innovation instruments. The existing instruments are in general local or national. EIT adds an international dimension. We want here to have German venture capitalists funding Finnish spin-offs etc. Possibility to share information about innovations, business plans, funding possibilities and incubation support
The Node offers for affiliate partners an "open innovation window" into the whole KIC-network by:
Sharing information, plans and results (under NDA?) of the Node and the whole KIC
Giving the role of "partner of choice" in planning and executing various EU-funded activities by the Node and whole KIC
Possibility and support for individuals of the affiliate to work and study in the Node and KIC  colocations
Access to promising young individuals with relevant background and high motivation
Access to new promising research teams with interesting results and ideas looking for start-up possibilities
Possibility share information (under NDA ?) about research results, innovations, business plans, funding  possibilities and incubation support
Match making possibilities for various partners in innovation chain  

13. The “Vertical” Components Application Domains Affected
Transportation
Automotive
Rail Systems
Aeronautic
Industrial Production Automation
production control, everywhere, incl. chemical industry
Robotics
Medical & Health Care Products
Energy
generation
distribution
power management & control
IT-Industry
Consumer Electronics
Household & Living Environment
Agriculture
 all sectors important for our daily life are directly affected by Embedded Systems !

14. The “Vertical” Components Industrial Branches : General Impact
For all industrial systems: All information is going to be in digital format
all sensors and distributed sensor networks will deliver digital information
amount of sensors will significantly increase  sensor networks
cost of creating and distributing digital information will rapidly decrease
Control of actors and energy management will also be digital
Remote control and high degree of automation will be standard, up to high degree of autonomy (with all threats !!)
Embedded Systems will be increasingly “networked”,  network of things and services
Management of data will require appropriate “Information Fusion” (MSI)
MSI technology will become cross sectorial technology.
Intelligence and productivity will increase in all areas of industry, due to to embedded systems and their connectivity.

15. The “Vertical” Components Industrial Branches : Opportunities/threats
Technologies will become more and more cross domain, leading to standardization and reduction of cost
Horizontalisation will lead to common design principles, common technologies, common tools and processes
Interoperability will increase, creating new chances for economic growth and progress.
Standardized communication procedures and data formats will lead to easy access to proprietary and confidential information
Data security, privacy of information in individual and industrial space will become major issue  Security !!!

16. Recommendation per Application
For each of the industrial sectors a specific impact analysis pointing out the specific priorities and needs, such as:
functional safety for all transportation, industrial automation, and health systems, including (re-) certification issues
energy efficiency and environmental compatibility / green approaches
cost efficiency in design and engineering phase, but also in production and operational phase of life cycle
interconnectivity
security against external threats
The technological base in nearly all cases can be developed in a common effort!
ARTEMIS shall be the harmonizing and orchestrating instrument !

17. The “Horizontal” components Reference Design and Architecture RDA
HW dependant SW.
Interface to the physical world
Autonomous and adaptive architectures
Establish a framework for control
Diagnostics
Architectures for mixed-criticality
Support for composability and re-use and reconfiguration
Resource awareness
Security by design
Distributed situational awareness systems
System of Systems

18. The “Horizontal” components Seamless Connectivity and Interoperability
Keep the old ones +
Semantic ontologies
Convergence leads to mixed criticality
Adaptive (gateways, resource mt, etc)
Incremental and evolutionary systems
Certification (for mixed criticality)
Data management

19. The “Horizontal” components Seamless Connectivity and Interoperability
From Syntactic to semantic interoperability, ontologies
The syntactic and semantic integration of systems developed in different domains will give rise to systems of systems that will provide emergent services of high utility.
developing ubiquitous connectivity schemes that support the syntactic and semantic integration of heterogeneous sub-systems and networks of Embedded Systems, under the constraints of minimum power consumption and limited bandwidth.
Convergence leads to mixed criticality, Incremental and evolutionary systems, Architectures for mixed-criticality
Dependability and security: The provision of a generic framework that supports mixed criticality, safe, secure, maintainable, reliable and timely system services despite the accidental failure of system components and the activity of malicious intruders is essential.
Certification (for mixed criticality), Modular certification
Certification: the control of physical devices and processes, e.g service robots that interact with humans, performed by embedded systems makes it necessary to certify the design by an independent certification authority. The envisioned architecture must support a modular certification.
Incremental development, incremental validation, incremental certification
The certification of mixed criticality systems and the development of well structured safety cases such that the safety of a proposed design can be convincingly demonstrated.
Self-organizing capabilities, Adaptive (gateways, resource mt, etc)
Techniques of device self-organization are needed to guarantee the devices capabilities to cooperate.
The Grand Challenge in the area of self-organizing systems relates to the reflection of sovereign computational unit about its current situation and the devising of a plan of actions such that a high level goal can be decomposed into a set of goal-oriented steps that can be executed autonomously. These systems have to adapt themselves according to environment changes, the preferences of the user and the current user goals.
Technologies to be considered are :
Position awareness, time awareness, discovery protocols, plan formulation, sensors fusion, “ways-and-means” modelling, neutral networks, expert systems or production systems.
Data management ……

20. The “Horizontal” components Design Methods and Tools
Multi/many core design methodologies
Keep old terms
Domain specific front-ends (designer interface)
Re-use of cross-domain models
Resource aware compilation
Ontology driven development for ES
How to design real-time distributed control systems
Multi-objective optimisation of real-time distributed systems in the presence of conflicting requirements
Design methods for mixed criticality and integration
Design for certification

21. R&D Innovation Ecosystem Ecosystems Constituents
ARTEMIS Strategy and vision
Inputs from the Working Groups
R&D
Open Inno- vation
Business Models
Standards
Education
External Relations
Tool Platform
SME involve- ment

22. Timeline SRA recalibration
WG-1 …
SRA 2010 proposal to the GA
Summer Camp
WG-n
WG-SRA
Preparation SRA2010
SRA2010
SRA2006
SRA workshop
MASP/RA2010
MASP/RA2011 1st draft
MASP/RA2011
AWP2010
AWP2011 1st draft
AWP2011
April 22
8-9
Nov
9,10
Oct
June
2010
June
2009 22

23. Summer camp inputs to SRA new version
Market & Investing in ES Research
Research Priorities
Prepare the future
Innovation eco-system

24. DAY 2 SRA break-out session: 4 themes
Research Priorities and challenges chaired by: Laila Gide
From application drivers to research priorities, challenges, and foundational research,…
Innovation Environment chaired by: Tatu Koljonen
Discuss SRA focus for, among others: CoIE, SME, Regulation, Standardisation, Open Source,...
Investing in E.S Research chaired by: Joseba Laka
Market opportunities, funding sources, National policies alignment.
ARTEMIS positioning in the future chaired by: Ad ten Berg
How should ARTEMIS position itself in the future and with respect to other PPPs and initiatives?