Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharles Ball Modified over 6 years ago
1
Regional use of combined carotid endarterectomy/coronary artery bypass graft and the effect of patient risk Douglas W. Jones, MD, David H. Stone, MD, Mark F. Conrad, MD, Yvon R. Baribeau, MD, Benjamin M. Westbrook, MD, Donald S. Likosky, PhD, Jack L. Cronenwett, MD, Philip P. Goodney, MD, MS Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Flow diagram depicting categorization of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). CABG, Coronary artery bypass graft. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Rates of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in baseline risk group compared to rates of stroke in patients undergoing CEA/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), stratified by symptom status. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Rates of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in baseline risk group compared to rates of stroke in patients undergoing CEA/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), stratified by risk category. Exact P value for isolated CEA vs low-risk category is Exact P value for isolated CEA vs high risk category is 4.5 × 10−7. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.