Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOwen Frank Watson Modified over 6 years ago
1
The Dynamics of Political Communication Chapter 10 Political News, Polls, and the Presidential Campaign © 2018 Taylor & Francis
2
Horse Race and Strategy-Based News
News media cover presidential politics as if it were a game, a sporting event, a horse race. Why? Some explanations: Horse race stories emphasize conflict Polls provide a patina of scientific responsibility to confer credibility Horse race stories are easy to cover Polls offer tangible evidence of how candidates are doing, which is reasonable for journalists to cover Voters follow and prefer strategically framed poll-dominated news Perhaps the election is a horse race © 2018 Taylor & Francis
3
Horse Race Coverage in Primary Election News: 1988–2016
Focus of coverage (percentage of stories)* 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 Horse race 49% 55% 56% 78% 77% 71% 64% 63% Policy issues 16% 72% 44% 22% 18% 14% 10% 26% What trends emerge from this table? How does horse race coverage make you feel about democracy and government? *Stories coded could include horse race and a policy focus, neither, or another category; thus the numbers do not add up to 100%. © 2018 Taylor & Francis
4
The science of Election Polls
A poll is “any political sample survey of the electorate conducted by the media, politicians, or political interest groups that aims for a relatively quick and somewhat cursory tally of the public’s political opinions and preferences” (Traugott & Lavrakas, 2008, p. 191) A sample is a scientifically selected subset of a larger population Well conducted scientific polls can provide accurate information and provide mechanism for citizen feedback to leaders, but … Polls have imperfections: They focus on likely voters, but that’s difficult to estimate Social desirability effects influence what people say Non-response bias is a problem Polls can fail to be predictive because of unexpected events © 2018 Taylor & Francis
5
Major News Media Storylines
Narratives or storylines are broad frames, influenced by journalistic, professional and economic factors, that shape campaign news reporting Media have six key narratives: Candidate schema Front-runner Losing ground Bandwagon Electability Exceeding expectations © 2018 Taylor & Francis
6
Candidate Schema Narratives
Reporters develop mental frameworks or schema to organize information about candidates Once they decide a schema fits a candidate, they invoke this in news stories Examples: Reagan as “the Great Communicator” Gore as a “serial exaggerator” Bush as “dumb” H. Clinton as “secretive” © 2018 Taylor & Francis
7
Front-runner Storyline
Trajectory of press positivity News initially gives considerable coverage to the front-running candidate because of poll numbers Over time, positive press is replaced by negative coverage as reporters desire to inform the public about the front- runner’s flaws © 2018 Taylor & Francis
8
Losing Ground Storyline
Trajectory of press positivity Coverage of a leading candidate gets more negative as support declines Press coverage frequently exaggerates the decline in support © 2018 Taylor & Francis
9
Bandwagon Storyline Trajectory of press positivity
When a candidate’s poll ratings or nomination victories increase sharply, news stories increase in favorability © 2018 Taylor & Francis
10
Electability and Exceeding Expectations Storylines
Electability storyline Candidates are framed by their likelihood of winning the nomination Press play up particular candidates’ supposedly small chances of gaining their party’s nomination Exceeding expectations storyline Candidates are favorably evaluated if they perform better than expected or… Negatively assessed if they did worse than anticipated Although Bernie Sanders’ trajectory was more positive than expected, the mainstream news never adopted a “bandwagon” or “exceeds expectations” storyline for him. At the same time, social media coverage of “Bernie” was overwhelmingly positive. What accounts for the difference? Note: In all of these storylines, candidate viability is the major determinant of news favorability © 2018 Taylor & Francis
11
Explaining Trump Vs. Clinton Campaign Coverage: Press Bias?
Favorability of Trump’s Press Coverage in the Early 2016 Campaign Explaining Trump Vs. Clinton Campaign Coverage: Press Bias? © 2018 Taylor & Francis
12
Explaining Trump Vs. Clinton Campaign Coverage: Press Bias?
© 2018 Taylor & Francis
13
Why did Trump Dominate the 2016 News Cycle?
Trump received substantially more mentions than candidates from both parties during the pre-primary period Trump captured the equivalent of $55 million of free advertising on major media outlets, 1.5 times that of his closest Republican rival Media may have focused on him more because: Novel & dramatic candidate Personally captivating A known celebrity Attracted large crowds Attracted a distinctive group of voters Exceeded expectations Star persona brought in viewers when news media was otherwise in financial decline © 2018 Taylor & Francis
14
Patterns of Coverage Coverage of Trump got more negative over the course of the campaign in the wake of scandals and poor debate performance Clinton coverage was more negative in the pre-primary period and got more positive over time Partisan bias doesn’t account for this pattern of coverage Liberal critics argue news made false equivalence between Trump and Clinton even though Trump lied 9 times more often Which traditional storylines do you see emerging from the patterns of coverage for Trump and for Clinton?
15
The Issues Quandary Political journalists traditionally neglect issues
By minimizing issue coverage, news does little to help voters understand complex problems facing the nation Horse race coverage drowns out issue coverage Issue coverage is frequently limited to short soundbites Voters could be ignorant of issues that directly affect them as a consequence Journalism avoids covering issues in depth because it would require journalists to comment on the intellectual quality of a candidate’s viewpoint – this could raise flags of perceived bias
16
Conclusions News covers elections primarily as a horse race and strategic game Pre-election polls are a key component of horse race news Political news is best understood by prevailing journalistic storylines These narratives can force the facts to fit journalists’ preconceived schemas Controversy continues over whether news over-covered Trump and exaggerated Clinton’s faults The overwhelmingly negative tone of press coverage is a broader concern There are good and bad effects of negative coverage The press fails to provide sufficient coverage of policy issues News is imperfect, but it does cover campaigns thoroughly and endlessly
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.