1. Interlimb Muscle and Fat Comparisons in Persons With Lower-Limb Amputation 
Vanessa D. Sherk, MS, Michael G. Bemben, PhD, Debra A. Bemben, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
The pQCT scan sites for the intact and amputated limbs. NOTE. Figure is not drawn to scale.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Thigh and calf percent fat values (mean ± SD) for amputated and intact limbs for each amputation group. For control participants, the same leg (right or left) that was amputated from their age- and sex-matched amputation participant was assigned as the “amputated” limb. *P<.01, significant limb effect; †P<.01; ††P<.05, significant limb × group interaction effect with the control group. ‡P<.01, significant limb and limb × group interaction effect with TF. Abbreviations: Amp, amputated.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions