Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarian Briggs Modified over 6 years ago
1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions versus conservative therapy for venous ulcers Karen F. Mauck, MD, MS, Noor Asi, MD, Chaitanya Undavalli, MBBS, Tarig A. Elraiyah, MBBS, Mohammed Nabhan, MD, Osama Altayar, MD, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol, MD, Larry J. Prokop, MLS, Mohammad Hassan Murad, MD, MPH Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 60S-70S.e2 (August 2014) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Study selection process. RCT, Randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Forest plot shows results of meta-analysis of open surgical procedures, with or without compression, compared with compression alone on ulcer healing outcomes, with all studies included. The solid squares denote the relative risk, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the pooled relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Forest plot shows results of meta-analysis of open surgical procedures, with or without compression, compared with compression alone on ulcer healing outcomes, with nonrandomized studies excluded. The solid squares denote the relative risk, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the pooled relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 Forest plot shows meta-analysis of open surgical procedures, with or without compression, compared with compression alone on ulcer recurrence outcomes, with all studies included. The solid squares denote the relative risk, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the pooled relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
6
Fig 5 Forest plot shows results of meta-analysis of open surgical procedures, with or without compression, compared with compression alone on ulcer recurrence outcomes, with nonrandomized studies excluded. The solid squares denote the relative risk, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the pooled relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
7
Fig 6 Forest plot shows results of meta-analysis of open surgical procedures, with or without compression, compared with compression alone on time in months to ulcer healing outcomes. The solid squares denote the mean difference, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the weighted mean differences. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
8
Fig 7 Forest plot shows results of meta-analysis of endovascular surgery compared with compression alone on ulcer healing outcomes, with all studies included. The solid squares denote the relative risk, the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the diamond denotes the pooled relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60S-70S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.