1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – HARYANA On 16.04.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – HARYANA On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Haryana (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of no. of meal served?
What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or – 10%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 84% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(+14% )
No. of Meal (in Crore)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(2% Less)
No. of children (In Lakhs)
(2% Less)
(2% Less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
16 % More
No. of Working days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*Including Opening Balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*Including Opening Balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Level of Unspent Balance of foodgrains
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total -- 3 4 10 20
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total -- 6 14 20

12. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
80%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise
Focus districts: -
Below 65% :-Rotak (39%), Ambala (45%), Panchkula (46%) etc.
Above 80% :- Mewat (138%), Jind (120%), Faridabad (101%) etc.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
0.45 Lakhs MTs
Benchmark of Utilization : 84%
0.36 Lakhs MTs
% Utilisation
0.14 Lakhs MTs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise
State level utilisation : 31%
Benchmark : 84%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Analysis: Cooking Cost Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Cooking Cost (in Lakhs)
17% More
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Benchmark
Utilisation: 84%
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Rs Lakhs
Rs Lakhs
Rs Lakhs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise
Districts
Focus Districts:
Below 60% :- Yamuna Nagar (56%) & Panchkula (58%)
Above 70% :- Jind (99%), Hisar (86%) , Panipat (84%) etc.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Mismatch between Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking Cost
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Reconciliation of Foodgrains utilisation
Deficit consumption of foodgrains
Sr. No.
District
No. of Meals served during to
Expected consumption of food grains (MTs)
Actual consumption of food grains (MTs)
Deficit Consumption in % 1
Rohtak
1.12 Cr.
301.07
-77% 2
Panchkula
0.74 Cr.
847.21
219.49
-74% 3
Ambala
1.67 Cr.
575.65
-72% 4
Bhiwani
2.31 Cr.
760.67 5
Yamuna Nagar
1.71 Cr.
619.48
-71% 6
Hisar
2.37 Cr.
836.09
-69% 7
Faridabad
2.24 Cr.
784.50
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
(51%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
4058 Units
Rs Lakhs
Progress (in %)
1849 Units
Rs Lakhs
1607 Units
Rs Lakhs
602 Units
Rs Lakhs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
Rs Lakhs
9507 Units
Progress (in %)
6645 Units
Rs Lakhs
2862 Units
Rs Lakhs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Lifting
80%
85% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
31%
84% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
72% 4.
MME Utilisation 0%
100% 5.
Transport Utilisation
51% 6.
Kitchen Shed construction
60% 7.
Kitchen Devices procurement
70% 8.
QPRs received
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
33% Less
40% Less
34% Less
41% Less
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(1% Less)
(2% Less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
(2% Less)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
51% Less
52% Less
54% Less
*:SSA= Govt+LB+GA
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Upper Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt.+Govt.-aided+LB) Vs MDM
(7% More)
(3% Less)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. Proposed Children for 2009-10 (Primary + Upper Primary)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
Sl. No
Year
As per DISE Data
As per MDM Sanctions 1.
154
240 2.
218
220 3.
Not available
204 4.
234
(State’s claim for )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

34. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India