Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Volume 389, Issue 10071, Pages (February 2017)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Volume 389, Issue 10071, Pages (February 2017)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Volume 389, Issue 10071, Pages 815-822 (February 2017)
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study  Hashim U Ahmed, FRCS, Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily, MBBCh, Louise C Brown, PhD, Rhian Gabe, PhD, Prof Richard Kaplan, FRCP, Prof Mahesh K Parmar, DPhil, Yolanda Collaco-Moraes, PhD, Katie Ward, BSc, Richard G Hindley, FRCS, Alex Freeman, FRCPath, Alex P Kirkham, FRCR, Robert Oldroyd, MA, Chris Parker, FRCR, Prof Mark Emberton, FRCS  The Lancet  Volume 389, Issue 10071, Pages (February 2017) DOI: /S (16) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Trial profile MP-MRI=multi-parametric MRI. CBP=combined biopsy procedure. The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (16) ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 Diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant cancer (primary definition) between MP-MRI and TPM-biopsy MP-MRI=multi-parametric MRI. TPM-biopsy=template prostate mapping biopsy. Pie charts represent actual MP-MRI scores 1–5. Sensitivity 93% (95% CI 88–96), positive predictive value 51% (46–56), specificity 41% (36–46), negative predictive value 89% (83–94). The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (16) ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 3 Diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant cancer (primary definition) between TRUS-biopsy and TPM-biopsy TRUS-biopsy=transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. TPM-biopsy=template prostate mapping biopsy. Sensitivity 48% (95% CI 42–55), positive predictive value 90% (83–94), specificity 96% (94–98), negative predictive value 74% (69–78) The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (16) ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Volume 389, Issue 10071, Pages (February 2017)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google