1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting Mizoram on 19.02.2013
Ministry of HRD
Government of India

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in MIZORAM (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Coverage of Institutions (Primary)
No. of Institutions
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Coverage of Institutions (Upper Primary)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Coverage of Children (Primary )
No. of Children (in Lakhs)
92%
92%
93%
Percentage indicates coverage of children against the Total Enrollment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Coverage of Children (Upper Primary)
No. of Children (in lakhs)
94%
92%
94%
Percentage indicated coverage against Enrollment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. No. of Working Days MDM Served ( Primary )
Total Working Days approval for : 215 Days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. No. of Working Days MDM Served : ( Upper Primary )
Total Working Days approval for : 220 Days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (P + UP.)
No. of Meals (in crore)
80%
71%
72%
Approval of Meals for whole year and achievement up to 3rd Quarter
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Utilization of Food Grains (1.4.12 to 31.12.12)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
71%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. FOOD GRAINS : ALLOCATION VS UTILISATION
No. of Institutions
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Payment of Cost of Food grains to FCI
Cost of Food Grain (Rs. In Lakhs )
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. COOKING COST: ALLOCATION VS UTILISATION
Rs in Crores
79%
71%
52%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. % Utilisation of foodgrains % Utilisation of Cooking cost
Mismatch between Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking Cost
Sr. No.
District
% Utilisation of foodgrains
% Utilisation of Cooking cost
Mis-match
in % points 1
Lunglei
72%
50%
-22 2
Champhai
51%
-21 3
Kolasib
52%
-20 4
Aizawl
71% 5
Lawngtlai 6
Serchhip
-19 7
Mamit 8
Saiha
70%
-18

15. Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers
Rs. In Crore
70%
5044 CCH engaged against PAB Approval of 5044
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Transportation Assistance : Allocation vs Utilisation
Rs in Lakhs
48%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. MME : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
63%
60%
23%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Construction of Kitchen cum Stores
Total Units sanctioned : 2396
1533 KS
863 KS
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Procurement of Kitchen Devices under MDM
Total Sanctioned : 2428
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Inspections
No. of Institutions
16%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Coverage : School Health Programme
No. of Institutions
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Coverage :School Health Programme
64%
17% 6%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Availability of Infrastructure
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. ISSUES
More than 3 months Delay in the release of funds at State Level.
Delay in the release of State’s matching share.
Low utilization of Cooking Cost.
Mis-match ranging from 18-22% in the utilization of food grain and Cooking Cost in all districts.
Only one SSMC meeting held (August, 2012) during
Low utilisation of MME and Poor Inspections of schools.

26. MI Findings Districts covered : Lunglei and Serchhip
All the visited schools are serving Mid Day Meal.
Buffer stock s maintained in 55% schools in Lunglei
No discrimination noticed in both districts.
Cook-cum-helper paid Rs.1500/- p.m.
None of the schools received the cooking cost in advance due to which the schools purchase MDM items on credit at higher prices.
Last instalment of funds were received in September, 2012.
None of the schools on Lunglei maintained health cards. Only 10% schools in Serchhip maintained health cards.

27. Contd..
90% schools in lunglei and 92% in Serchhip were never inspected.
Honorarium to Cook-cum-helpers is paid on quarterly basis.
Daily menu in majority of the schools was mainly rice preparation with dal or potato.
Micronutrients provided to 25% children only.
Both the districts had Kitchen sheds but 77% of visited schools in Lunglei had kitchen devices.
Very Low Participation of parents in supervision and management of MDM.

28. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2013-14
PART-II
Analysis of State’s Proposal for
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Proposal for 2013-14 : Children (Primary)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Enrolment
PAB Approval 12-13
Availed MDM (9 months)
Availed MDM in Q-1
Proposal for
Availed MDM in Q-2
Availed MDM in Q-3
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Proposal for 2013-14 : Children (Upper Primary)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Enrolment
PAB Approval 12-13
Availed MDM (9 months)
Availed MDM in Q-1
Proposal for
Availed MDM in Q-2
Availed MDM in Q-3
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme
Approved by PAB during
Engaged during
Additional Proposal for
( )
Cook-cum-helper
5044
416
State has proposed to engage 416 more CCH in addition to the already engaged 5044 CCH.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store
No. of Schools
Sanctioned
Constructed through convergence
Gap
Proposal for
2506
2396 -
110
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. Proposal for Procurement of Kitchen Devices
No. of Schools
Sanctioned
Procured through convergence
Gap
Replacement
2506
2428 78
685
State has submitted the Proposal for Replacement of 685 units of kitchen devices, however 567 units of kitchen devices were sanctioned to the State during , which are eligible for replacement this year.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

34. Proposals and Recommendations
S. No
Component
PAB Approval
Proposal for
Recommendation 1
Children (Pry)
127000
1,19,000 2
Children (U Pry)
47000
46,000 3
Working Days (Pry and U Pry)
215(Pry)
(U.Pry)
215 (Pry)
220 (U.Pry) 4
Kitchen cum Store - 5
Cook cum Helper
5044
416(additional) 6
Kitchen Devices
686 =
78 (Gap)+ 608(Replacement)
685
(for replacement)
567 (sanctioned during )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

35. Thank You