1. Bakersfield College Annual Program Review Work Session 2013
Tuesday, July 2, 2013

2. Who’s Here? Program Review Committee (Hosts)
Representation from Academic Senate
Representation from Faculty Chairs & Directors Council
Representation from Student Services
Representation from Classified Personnel
Representation from College Administrators

3. Context: Fitting the APR into the Big Picture
Program review process is integral to:
Continuous improvement
Institutional planning
Integration of processes (assessment, curriculum, budget)
Student success, retention and persistence
Reviewing the Program Review process ensures:
Process relevance and accuracy
BC Strategic Planning: The Four Data Strands
Student Learning Outcomes & Assessment
Student Success Report Card (previously ARCC)
Operational Metrics
Perception Data

4. Session Objectives & Outcomes (What it is)
Review and update APR forms
ensure alignment with institutional metrics
maximize efficiency and meaningfulness of the Program Review process
Develop a 1-year Annual Program Update form
Time permitting:
Propose a 3-year Program Review Cycle
Discuss committee membership
Develop a PRC calendar for

5. General Questions about Session Purpose, Vision and Focus
Setting the Stage:
General Questions about Session Purpose, Vision and Focus

6. Agenda Review Fall 2012 APR Survey Feedback
Discuss data metrics to include in APR
Review and Update APR Forms
Instructional APR
Non-Instructional APR
Develop an Annual Program Update form
Propose a 3-year Program Review Cycle
Committee membership
Develop a PRC calendar for

7. Questions to Answer What classifications of APRs should exist?
(Instructional, CTE, Student Services, Admin & Business Services)
Data: How can we move from subject-level data to program-level data?
When should the 3-year APR cycle begin?
How can incorporate budget information in the APR?