Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Measuring College and Career Readiness"— Presentation transcript:

1 Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Harding Township School October 15, 2018 Mary Donohue, Principal/Director of Curriculum Matthew A. Spelker, Superintendent Measuring College and Career Readiness

2 Highlights of trends from the 2018 PARCC Administration
Language Arts: As a school, HTS had 90% of its students passing the ELA assessment in 2018 versus 77% passing in 2015 (a double digit increase of 13%). As a school, HTS had 3% less students achieving a Level 1 or Level 2 score in a comparison of same grade scores (2018 vs. 2015). Four of the five cohort groups saw “meeting and exceeding” scores increase year over year (from 2017 to 2018). HTS continues to maintain its high level of growth and achievement.

3 Highlights of trends from the 2018 PARCC administration
Mathematics From 2015 to 2018 HTS saw a double-digit increase of 19% in passing scores (levels 4 and 5). From 2015 to 2018 HTS saw a decrease of 7% in level 1 and 2 scores. As a school, HTS saw its highest achievement in Math scores in 2018 versus any previous year.

4 Year to Year Increase/Decrease
Comparison of Harding Township School Students Tested Spring 2016, 2017, and 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy Students Tested Year to Year Increase/Decrease 2016 2017 2018 Grade 3 32 39 20 -19 Grade 4 27 36 35 -1 Grade 5 34 30 33 +3 Grade 6 31 -9 Grade 7 +4 Grade 8 17 28 +2 TOTAL 172 203 183 -20 181 Students took test in 2015 . Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

5 Comparison of Harding Township School Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to new jersey- percentages Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) State District 2018 Grade 3 13.5 15.0 0.0 21.4 10.0 43.5 50.0 8.1 25.0 Grade 4 7.6 2.9 12.3 22.1 39.1 45.7 18.9 48.6 Grade 5 6.9 12.6 3.0 22.4 12.1 47.2 78.8 10.8 6.1 Grade 6 6.2 13.6 24.0 6.7 41.3 14.9 43.3 Grade 7 8.6 10.2 18.5 34.1 22.9 28.6 74.3 Grade 8 8.7 11.1 19.8 3.3 39.9 40.0 20.4 . Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

6 Year to Year Increase/Decrease
Comparison of Harding Township School Students Tested Spring 2016, 2017, and 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics Students Tested Year to Year Increase/Decrease 2016 2017 2018 Grade 3 32 39 20 -19 Grade 4 27 36 35 -1 Grade 5 34 30 33 +3 Grade 6 31 -9 Grade 7 +4 Grade 8 17 28 +2 TOTAL 172 203 183 -20 . Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

7 Comparison of Harding Township School Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations MATHEMATICS to new jersey- percentages Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) State District 2018 Grade 3 8.0 5.0 15.3 23.7 37.8 35.0 15.2 50.0 Grade 4 7.5 0.0 16.8 26.3 17.1 41.8 60.0 7.6 22.9 Grade 5 3.0 17.0 6.1 26.7 12.1 38.5 57.6 10.4 21.2 Grade 6 8.5 3.3 20.1 27.9 35.6 7.9 6.7 Grade 7 7.7 20.4 8.6 28.6 5.7 36.0 7.4 25.7 Grade 8* 22.0 23.5 22.7 17.6 27.1 27.2 41.2 1.0 Algebra I 11.3 n/a 18.6 24.3 39.3 6.5 Geometry 9.4 31.5 29.6 24.6 4.9 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

8 Four Year Comparison Of Harding Township School English/Language Arts Results: Highest Two Levels (Same Grade/different students)

9 Four Year Comparison Of Harding Township School English/Language Arts Results- Lowest Two Levels (Same grade/different students)

10 Four Year Cohort- Ela results highest two levels (Same Students/Different grades)
G3-G4= this year’s fifth grade G3-G4-G5= This year’s sixth grade

11 Four Year Cohort- ELA Results-Lowest two levels (Same Students/Different grades)

12 Four Year Comparison Of Harding Township School Mathematics Results: Highest Two Levels (Same Grade/different students)

13 Four Year Comparison Of Harding Township School Mathematics Results- Lowest Two Levels (Same grade/different students)

14 Four Year Cohort- Mathematics results-Highest two levels (Same Students/Different grades)

15 Four Year Cohort- Mathematics Results-Lowest two levels (Same Students/Different grades)

16 2018- Third Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing (level 4 and Level 5)
Nation= over 350,000 students states include: NJ, NM, DC, Maryland, Illinois State= over 100,00 students

17 2018- Fourth Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing (level 4 and level 5)

18 2018- Fifth Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing (Level 4 and level 5)

19 2018- sixth Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing (level 4 and level 5)

20 2018- seventh Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing level 4 and level 5

21 2018- eighth Grade HTS Comparison to state and nation: % passing level 4 and level 5

22 COMPARISON OF Harding Township School to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY % Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 Harding Township School State Grade 3 Up 3% Down 6% Down 2% Up 8% Grade 4 Down 3% Up 19% Up 7% Grade 5 Up 13% Up 6% Grade 6 Down 14% Down 4% Up 18% Grade 7 Down 13% Down 7% Up 36% Up 9% Grade 8 Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. - An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

23 COMPARISON OF Harding Township School 2015 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics
% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 Harding Township School State Grade 3 Up 10% Down 4% Down 6% Up 8% Grade 4 Down 5% Down 7% Grade 5 Down 11% Down 2% Up 22% Grade 6 Down 15% Down 0% Up 11% Up 2% Grade 7 Down 31% Up 79% Up 6% Grade 8 N/A Down 3% Up 4% Algebra I* Down 9% *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

24 Comparison of Harding Township School Spring 2015, 2016,2017 & PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - PERCENTAGES Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) Change in Level 1 and Level 2 From to 2018 Change in Level 4 and Level 5 From to 2018** Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 3 0% 3% 15% 8% 6% 10% 83% 69% 64% 50% 22% 26% 25% +15% -16% 4 5% 23% 43% 52% 44% 46% 30% 48% 47% 49% -2% +22% 5 14% 12% 7% 60% 71% 79% 20% 18% -3% +5% 6 38% 56% 35% 36% -15% +20% 7 11% 13% 33% 42% 28% 68% 55% 74% -17% +36% 8 53% 39% 40% 24% +4% +7% Overall ELA 1% 2% 51% 27% 41% +12% Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

25 Comparison of Harding Township School Spring 2015, 2016, 2017 & PARCC Administrations Mathematics - PERCENTAGES Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) Change in Level 1 and Level 2 From to 2018 Change in Level 4 and Level 5 From to 2018 Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 3 0% 3% 5% 8% 6% 10% 58% 44% 35% 33% 47% 46% 50% +10% -6% 4 20% 4% 14% 17% 68% 74% 56% 60% 22% 28% 23% -5% -7% 5 12% 26% 63% 11% 7% 21% -11% +22% 6 18% 24% 27% 54% 13% -15% +11% 7 16% 9% 53% 29% 48% 39% -31% +79% 8* n/a 41% Overall Math 2% 1% 25% 49% 55% -9% *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

26 Next Steps How does the faculty and administration use this data?
As a district, what data do we decide to focus on? Types of data and analysis: - District and grade level data - Individual student data - Student-level analysis - Item analysis

27 Year four Data Plan: Drilling Down
District and School Level Data: Math, ELA, reading and writing, and also by grade levels Disaggregated data, by subgroups Disaggregated data by categories, (i.e., standards sub-claims) Item analysis Student-level analysis

28 Examples of Data and analysis-Disaggregated data by subgroups

29 Example- Item Analysis

30 Item Analysis-continued

31 Student-Level Analysis
Student-level analysis has already begun with our teachers whose students take the PARCC assessment. Preliminary meetings regarding the results on the spring 2018 assessment took place in August and early September. Analysis of student scores from last year’s assessment; this includes strengths and weaknesses of 2018 students and current students. This includes a deeper look at how past students performed and the instructional needs of current students. Analysis of items so that trends regarding performance can be determined.

32 2019 Changes to the State assessment
“The State of New Jersey has ended its membership of the interstate consortium that produced the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments.”- Linda P. Eno, Ed.D. Asst. Commissioner, DOE-Division of Academic Performance 10/5/18 The statewide assessments for ELA and mathematics will be called: - New Jersey Student Learning Assessments–ELA (NJSLA-ELA) - New Jersey Student Learning Assessment- Math (NJSLA- M)

33 2019 Changes to the state assessment-Continued
Reduction in the length and time of the tests: ELA: Grade 3: = 3 units-225 minutes 2019= 2 units- 150 minutes Grades 4/5: = 3 units- 270 minutes 2019= 2 units- 180 minutes Grades 6-8: = 3 units- 270 minutes

34 2019 Changes to the state assessment-Continued
Reduction in the length and time of the tests: Math: Grade 3-5: = 4 units-240 minutes 2019= 3 units- 180 minutes Grades 6-8: = 3 units- 240 minutes

35 Questions/Comments Board member and community member questions/comments


Download ppt "Measuring College and Career Readiness"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google