Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.

Published byἉνανίας Γεωργιάδης Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic."— Presentation transcript:

1 Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity.
Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Similarity scores were taken from Costanzo et al (2010) and represent a combination of array side and query side correlations (Materials and methods). Nodes shown include all first neighbors of the three primary genes of interest (CIK1, VIK1 and KAR3). A threshold of 0.2 was used as in Costanzo et al (2010) and edges between first neighbors of genes of interest have been removed for clarity. (B) Genetic interactions. SGA genetic interaction scores from Costanzo et al (2010) highlight differences between CIK1 and VIK1. Green lines represent positive interactions, whereas red lines represent negative interactions. The opacity of the line is proportional to the strength of the interaction. Benjamin VanderSluis et al. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:429 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend

Download ppt "Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic."

Similar presentations

GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.

GFP‐Sed5p localization defect in sgt2Δ.
Tuning the response of the DPI

Tuning the response of the DPI
Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits from DNA sequence Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits.

Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits from DNA sequence Principles of using neural networks for predicting molecular traits.
Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.

Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.
Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.

Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.
Inferred dynamic model of transcriptional regulatory network.

Inferred dynamic model of transcriptional regulatory network.
Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the Hnf4a locus Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the.

Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the Hnf4a locus Hnf4g importance in human colon cancer organoids and regulation of the.
(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.

(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.
Sensitivity of RNA‐seq.

Sensitivity of RNA‐seq.
Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.

Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.
Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.

Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.
Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter architecture. Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter.

Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter architecture. Tight regulation of gene expression variation is coupled to promoter.
Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.

Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.
Exo‐metabolomics profiling of major metabolites elucidated the metabolic capabilities of monospecies Exo‐metabolomics profiling of major metabolites elucidated.

Exo‐metabolomics profiling of major metabolites elucidated the metabolic capabilities of monospecies Exo‐metabolomics profiling of major metabolites elucidated.
Two competing models for Rab domain identity generation and endosome conversion. Two competing models for Rab domain identity generation and endosome conversion.

Two competing models for Rab domain identity generation and endosome conversion. Two competing models for Rab domain identity generation and endosome conversion.
Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.

Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.
Validation of the CCE associations by mass spectrometry.

Validation of the CCE associations by mass spectrometry.
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.

(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.
Mononucleotide models describe sequence‐to‐shape relationships well

Mononucleotide models describe sequence‐to‐shape relationships well
Topological overlap matrix (TOM) plots of weighted, gene coexpression networks constructed from one mouse studies (A–F) and four human studies including.

Topological overlap matrix (TOM) plots of weighted, gene coexpression networks constructed from one mouse studies (A–F) and four human studies including.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google