1. Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 430-452 (February 2014)
Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Repair of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 
Riccardo Autorino, Christopher Eden, Alaa El-Ghoneimi, Giorgio Guazzoni, Nicolòmaria Buffi, Craig A. Peters, Robert J. Stein, Matthew Gettman 
European Urology 
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
DOI: /j.eururo
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flow of study selection.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Meta-analysis of success rate and complication rates between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the adult population. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of analgesic requirement and hospital stay between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Meta-analysis of success rate and complication rates between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Meta-analysis of operative times and hospital stay between minimally invasive pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Meta-analysis of operative times and complication rates between robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CI=confidence interval; IV=inverse variance; MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

8. Fig. 7
Meta-analysis of hospital stay and success rate between robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CI=confidence interval; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel (test); MIP=minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pyeloplasty; OP=open pyeloplasty.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions