Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJuan Manuel Murillo Mora Modified over 6 years ago
1
Bituminous-faced Rockfill Dam Seismic Performance Prediction of stress-strain behaviour and potential damages Proposal for the 15th International Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams Proposers: A. Vecchietti 1 , G. Russo 1 , S. De Marco 2, A. Fiorino 2, M. Cecconi 3, V. Pane 3, G. Mazzà 4 1 University of Cassino & Southern Lazio, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2 So.Ri.Cal Spa 3 University of Perugia, Department of Engineering 4 ICOLD, ITCOLD & RSE Spa
2
Menta Dam
3
Menta Dam Max. Elevation: 89.75 m (crest elevation: 1431.75 m a.s.l.)
Menta Dam is a Bituminous-faced rockfill dam (BFRD) Max. Elevation: m (crest elevation: m a.s.l.) Slope: :1.8 (downstream face has 2 berms at Elev and m a.s.l.) Crest Length: 450 m (325.0 m main valley m «selletta») Top Width: 10 m Storage: 1.8×107 m3 Water: Level Elev. m a.s.l. (min. WL) m a.s.l. (retention WL) m a.s.l. (max. WL) main embankment «selletta»
4
Menta Dam Plan view Longitudinal section main embankment «selletta»
5
Menta Dam Cross-sections Sez.2 Sez.1 Sez.3 Sez.4 Sez.4 Sez.1 Sez.3
6
Menta Dam Cross-section (elements) Rockfill embankment (dam body)
Bituminous concrete facing - guarantees the impoundment of the reservoir Foundation is made of metamorphic fractured rock Cement-water injections reaching a depth of about 50 m - create a grout curtain Draining layer at dam-foundation interface - prevents ∆u in the embankment
7
Central Italy earthquake (2016 sequence)
Objective Main objective: evaluation of the embankment stress-strain behaviour under seismic conditions Seismic scenario: ag = 0.45 g, n.2 time series recording as input The impoundment level to be considered is m a.s.l. Friuli earthquake (1976) Central Italy earthquake (2016 sequence)
8
Methodology Requirements:
Analyses must account for stiffness dependence on shear strain levels (G-γ) and hysteretic damping, typical of soil dynamic behaviour The comparison of results will allow the evaluation of different rockfill constitutive models response Assumptions: Plane strain (2-D) numerical simulations dam body can be considered homogeneous embankment piezometers support the ∆u = 0 hypothesis
9
Methodology Available data:
Results from in situ and laboratory tests on rockfill samples
10
compressive strength , fc (kPa) tensile strength, ft (kPa)
Methodology Available data: Foundation rock-mass Bituminous facing γ (kN/m3) E (MPa) ν (-) k (m/s) 27 7×103 0.25 1.0×10-7 γ (kN/m3) E (MPa) ν (-) k (m/s) 24 150 0.44 impervious compressive strength , fc (kPa) tensile strength, ft (kPa) 1490 950
11
Results Aims: Deformation patterns of the embankment at the end of the dynamic simulation: crest settlements, permanent displacement profile of the axis of the dam, strain contour plot … Stress states and Stability assessment (proximity to failure) (optional) Assessment of seismic behaviour of the bituminous facing by analysing potential damages and cracking of the upstream face Expected working time: 2-3 weeks
12
Proposers: S. De Marco, A. Fiorino _ So.Ri.Cal Spa
G. Russo, A. Vecchietti _ University of Cassino & Southern Lazio, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering M. Cecconi, V. Pane _ University of Perugia, Department of Engineering G. Mazzà _ ICOLD, ITCOLD & RSE Spa
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.