1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – Andaman & Nicobar Island
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – Andaman & Nicobar Island On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Andaman & Nicobar Islands (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of no. of meal served?
What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or - 10%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 89% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal in Q1+Q2+Q3)
No. of Meal (in Lakhs)
27% more
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(20% more)
No. of children (In Thousand)
(17% more)
(24% More)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
6 % More
No. of Working days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark : 85%
100%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark of utilisation: 89%
MTs
MTs
% Utilisation
MTs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Rs Lakhs
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Rs Lakhs
Rs Lakhs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Cooking Cost Utilisation
Benchmark 89%
Rs Lakhs
Rs Lakhs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost
Excess foodgrains utilization
% Utilisation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
Information not provided by UT
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
(100%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %)
Information regarding achievement of const. of Kitchen shed not furnished by UT
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Achievement during 2006-09 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %)
Information regarding achievement of procurement of Kitchen Devices not furnished by UT
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Lifting
100%
85% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
78%
89% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
53% 4.
MME Utilisation 0% 5.
Transport Utilisation 6.
Kitchen Shed construction 7.
Kitchen Devices procurement 8.
QPRs
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in thousands)
(6% Less)
(6% Less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in thousands)
100%
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
No. of children (in thousands)
0.6 % More
5% Less
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in thousands)
3% More
3% More
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
Sl. No
Year
As per DISE Data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
207
202 3
199
220 4
Not available 5
227
(State’s claim for )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India