Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control"— Presentation transcript:

1 Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control
Community Structure: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control

2 Hairston, Smith and Slobodkin (1960)
Community Dynamics Carnivores Detritivores control Resource limited Frees plants from herbivore control Herbivores Plants

3 Critiques Too Simple 1) Species differences matter 2) Plant dominance could be explained by good defences

4 ?? Other inferences of Hairston et al, 1960
1) Exceptions not important X 2) All communities have 3 trophic levels 3) Omnivory not important X 4) External abiotic factors - not controllers X

5 Robles et al, 1995 Mean Density (seastars/m2) Recruitment index of Mytilus

6 Menge and Sutherland, 1976 Effects of predation by whelks. Predation is weak High wave energy - effects of predation -weak Moderate wave energy - effects of predation - strong Menge Sutherland

7 Bottom Up Control Fretwell, 1977, 1987
- availability of plant material governs structure of food chains - Low productivity - 1 link (plants) - Higher productivity - add links

8 Ecological Relationships in Kelp Forests
Orca Sea Otter Urchins

9 Transplant mussels and barnacles (filter feeders) to urchin-dominated and
kelp-dominated substrates Expected (top down) Urchin Kelp

10 Transplant mussels and barnacles (filter feeders) to urchin-dominated and
kelp-dominated substrates Expected (top down) Observed (bottom up) Urchin Urchin Kelp Kelp

11 Clearly - can be a complex interaction
Increased nutrient Increased algae Increased benthic filter feeders Increased consumers (predation) control

12 Interaction of Systems
High flow Low flow Leonard et al, 1998

13 Interaction of Systems
• increased seaweed growth • increased filter feeder growth • increased consumer pressure • increased larval settlement • increased sedimentation • low consumer efficiency • lower densities of organisms with planktonic larvae • higher densities of organisms with planktonic larvae • increased consumer mortality • more spatial competition • less spatial competition

14 Leonard et al, 1998 Hydrodynamics Flow rate Time

15 Leonard et al, 1998 Community structure High flow Low flow Tide height Percent cover Percent cover barnacles Fucus mussels Bare space

16 Leonard et al, 1998 High flow Recruitment rates Low flow Barnacles Mussels Snails Density (#/100 cm2)

17 Leonard et al, 1998 Crab predation High flow Low flow On Littorina, Nucella, Mytilus Predation Intensity (% mortality)

18 Leonard et al, 1998 crabs grazers mussels barnacles diatoms Nutrients Larvae Plankton

19 crabs whelks grazers mussels barnacles Leonard et al, 1998 crabs
diatoms diatoms Nutrients Larvae Plankton Nutrients Larvae Plankton

20 (-) Predators (-) (-) Consumers Plants Interference competition,
exploitative competition for resources other than food Depletion of more nutritious, palatable or accessible prey (-) Predators (-) (-) - (+) Induced morphological or chemical defenses, hiding, retreat to refuges Consumers + (-) Cover from (for) predators Stimulation of area-specific primary productivity Plants (+) Powers. ‘92. Ecology 73: 733


Download ppt "Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google