Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Capacity Planning
2
Capacity Capacity (I): is the upper limit on the load that an operating unit can handle. Capacity (II): the upper limit of the quantity of a product (or product group) that an operating unit can produce (= the maximum level of output) Capacity (III): the amount of resource inputs available relative to output requirements at a particular time
3
Examples of Capacity Measures
4
Capacity Design capacity Effective capacity
maximum output rate or service capacity an operation, process, or facility is designed for = maximum obtainable output = best operating level Effective capacity Design capacity minus allowances such as personal time, maintenance, and scrap (leftover) Actual output = Capacity used rate of output actually achieved. It cannot exceed effective capacity.
5
Capacity Efficiency and Capacity Utilization
Actual output Efficiency = Effective capacity Utilization = Design capacity
6
Determinants of Effective Capacity
Facilities, layout Product and service factors Process factors Human factors Policy (shifts, overtime) Operational factors Supply chain factors External factors
7
Capacity Cushion level of capacity in excess of the average utilization rate or level of capacity in excess of the expected demand. Capacity cushion = (designed capacity / capacity used) – 1 Sources of Uncertainty Manufacturing Customer delivery Supplier performance Changes in demand
8
The „Make or Buy” problem
Available capacity Expertise Quality considerations Nature of demand Cost Risk
9
Developing Capacity Alternatives
Design flexibility into systems Take stage of life cycle into account (complementary product) Take a “big picture” approach to capacity changes Prepare to deal with capacity “chunks” Attempt to smooth out capacity requirements Identify the optimal operating level
10
Adapting capacity to demand through changes in workforce
PRODUCTION RATE (CAPACITY)
11
Adaptation with inventory
DEMAND Inventory reduction Inventory accumulation CAPACITY
12
Adaptation with subcontracting
DEMAND SUBCONTRACTING PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
13
Adaptation with complementary product
PRODUCTION (CAPACITY) DEMAND DEMAND PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
14
Production units have an optimal rate of output for minimal cost.
Economies of Scale Economies of scale If the output rate is less than the optimal level, increasing output rate results in decreasing average unit costs Diseconomies of scale If the output rate is more than the optimal level, increasing the output rate results in increasing average unit costs Production units have an optimal rate of output for minimal cost. Minimum cost Average cost per unit Rate of output Minimum average cost per unit
15
Evaluating Alternatives II.
Minimum cost & optimal operating rate are functions of size of production unit. Small plant Medium plant Average cost per unit Large plant Output rate
16
Seminar exercises
17
Designed capacity in calendar time
CD= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period) CD= designed capacity (mins / planning period) N = number of calendar days in the planning period (365) sn= maximum number of shifts in a day (= 3 if dayshift + swing shift + nightshift) sh= number of hours in a shift (in a 3 shifts system, it is 8 per shift) mn= number of homogenous machine groups
18
Designed capacity, with given work schedule
C’D= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period) C’D= designed capacity (mins / planning period) N = number of working days in the planning period (≈ 250 wdays/yr) sn= number of shifts in a day (= 3 if dayshift + swing shift + nightshift) sh= number of hours in a shift (in a 3 shifts system, it is 8) mn= number of homogenous machine groups
19
Effective capacity in working minutes
CE = CD - tallowances (mins / planning period) CD= designed capacity tallowances = allowances such as personal time, maintenance, and scrap (mins / planning period) b = ∙ CE b = expected capacity (that we use in product mix decisions) CE = effective capacity = performance percentage
20
Exercise 1. A company produces a product in 2 shifts pattern and 250 days in a given year. Two machines are available in the workstation. The maintenance needs 8 hours in a month. The performance rate in the first shift is 90%, in the second shift 80%. Each product needs 25 minutes to be finished. a) Determine the designed capacity for one year. b) Determine the effective capacity for one year. c) Determine the expected capacity for one year. d) Determine the number of products we can produce. e) Determine the utilization and efficiency if the actual output is pieces. d) Determine capacity cushion.
21
Exercise 2. Set up the product-resource matrix using the following data! RP coefficients: a11: 10, a22: 20, a23: 30, a34: 10 The planning period is 4 weeks (there are no holidays in it, and no work on weekends) Work schedule: R1 and R2: 2 shifts, each is 8 hour long R3: 3 shifts Homogenous machines: 1 for R1 2 for R2 1 for R3 Maintenance time: only for R3: 5 hrs/week Performance rate: 90% for R1 and R3 80% for R2
22
Solution (bi) Ri = N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 ∙
N=(number of weeks) ∙ (working days per week) R1 = 4 weeks ∙ 5 working days ∙ 2 shifts ∙ 8 hours per shift ∙ 60 minutes per hour ∙ 1 homogenous machine ∙ 0,9 performance = = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 ∙ 0,9 = minutes per planning period R2 = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 2 ∙ 0,8 = mins R3 = (4 ∙ 5 ∙ 3 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 – 5 hrs per week ∙ 60 minutes ∙ 4 weeks) ∙ 0,9= ( – 1200 ) ∙ 0,9= mins
23
Solution (RP matrix) P1 P2 P3 P4 10 20 30 b (mins/y) R1 17 280 R2
P1 P2 P3 P4 b (mins/y) R1 10 17 280 R2 20 30 30 720 R3 24 840
24
Exercise 1.2 Complete the corporate system matrix with the following marketing data: There are long term contract to produce at least: 50 P1 100 P2 120 P3 50 P4 Forecasts says the upper limit of the market is: units for P1 1 200 for P2 1 000 for P3 2 000 for P4 Unit prices: P1=100, P2=200, P3=330, P4=100 Variable costs: R1=5/min, R2=8/min, R3=11/min
25
Solution (CS matrix) 10 20 30 P1 P2 P3 P4 b (mins/y) R1 17 280 R2
P1 P2 P3 P4 b (mins/y) R1 10 17 280 R2 20 30 30 720 R3 24 840 MIN (pcs/y) 50 100 120 MAX (pcs/y) 10 000 1 200 1 000 2 000 price 200 330 Contr. Marg. 40 90 -10
26
What is the optimal product mix to maximize revenues?
P3= ( ∙20-)/30= 957<MAX P4=24 840/10=2484>2000
27
What if we want to maximize profit?
The only difference is in P4 because of its negative contribution margin. P4=50
28
Exercise 2 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 6 3 2 4 1 b (hrs/y) R1 2 000 R2 R3 1 000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 b (hrs/y) R1 6 2 000 R2 3 2 R3 4 1 000 R4 6 000 R5 1 5 000 MIN (pcs/y) 200 100 400 MAX (pcs/y) 20000 500 2000 p (HUF/pcs) 50 cm (HUF/pcs) 80 40 -30 20 -10
29
Solution Revenue max. P1=333 P2=400 P3=400 P4=200 P5=1000
Contribution max. P1=333 P2=500 P3=250 P4=100 P5=1000
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.