1. 802.11 Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Reports
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Reports
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

2. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document is a digest of the closing reports of all sub-groups for presentation at the Nov 2009 closing plenary meeting.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

3. Agenda for 2009-11-17 Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector
Nov 2009
July 2007
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Agenda for
Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector
Go round table and get brief status report
Review action items from previous meeting
Numbering Alignment process
Amendment Ordering / ANA Status / Draft Snapshots
Lessons learned from TGw/TGn RevCom
Lessons learned from initial editing of TGn
Style Guide for /1034r0
Conference Calls
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/3 of 11-09/1110r2 (part) by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Page 3
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

4. Draft Development Snapshot
May 2006
July 2007
July 2009
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Nov 2009
Nov 2009
Draft Development Snapshot
Most current doc shaded green.
Changes from last report shown in red. TG
Published or Draft Baseline Documents
Source
MEC
Style Guide
Editor
Snapshot Date
802.11 k r y w n z p v u s mb aa
2007
2008
10.0
11.0
6.0
Word
Yes
Menzo Wentink
17-July
5.0
9.0
Frame 7.2
2009
Wayne Fisher
2-Nov
7.03 No
Emily Qi
18-Nov
7.0
8.0
Necati Canpolat
4.0
6.01
5.01
3.04
Frame 8.0
Kazuyuki Sakoda , pro-tem
2007 Inc
2008 Inc -
1.03
Adrian Stephens
12-May
3.0
0.02
Hang Lui
Slide 4
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/3 of 11-09/1110r2 (part) by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Page 4
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

5. 802.11 Style Guide See 11-09-1034-00-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Style Guide
See wg11-style-guide.doc
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/3 of 11-09/1110r2 (part) by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

6. Closing Report Date: 2009-11-20 Authors: Nov 2009 May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/3 of 11-09/1288r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

7. Closing report for WNG SC for November 2009, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
Closing report for WNG SC for November 2009, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/3 of 11-09/1288r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

8. Three presentations at this meeting
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
November 2009
Three presentations at this meeting
Continuous network discovery using Opportunistic Scanning ( ) – Marc Emmelmann
Straw Poll: Should IEEE WNG receive further presentations analyzing if existing mechanisms can be used to support seamless handoff for (highly) mobile users?
Result: Yes - 21; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
Time-based ranging technology for IEEE ( ) – Dong Kyoo Kim
IEEE for High Speed Mobility ( ) – Hiroki Nakano
Does WNG think that we need further presentations exploring the need for support for mobile communication.
Result: Yes - 25; No - 0; Need More Discussion - 3; Don’t Care - 1.
Minutes r0
Plans for January 2010
2 hour session
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/3 of 11-09/1288r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

9. November 2009 TGmb Closing Report
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
November 2009 TGmb Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

10. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
Closing report for TGmb for November 2009 plenary meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

11. TGmb Status Nov 2009 May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0528r0
Time to (re)circulate…
Photo credit: Matthew Gast; used with permission (duh)
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

12. Accomplishments No interpretation requests received
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Accomplishments
No interpretation requests received
Comment processing from LB149 is complete
Asking for recirculation ballot
15 days is standard recirculation time, we have requested approximately four weeks due to holiday season and incorporation of w-2009
Roll-up of n-2009 will commence in parallel to letter ballot
Recirculation anticipated in March 2010 that includes n-2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

13. Onward to January No change to end date in plan of record
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Onward to January
No change to end date in plan of record
Staying in working group ballot longer
Requesting weekly teleconferences every Friday for 90 minutes at 11 am ET beginning January 29
Goal: Recirculation letter ballot after March meeting
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

14. Revised TGmb Plan of Record (changes from start of week underlined)
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Revised TGmb Plan of Record (changes from start of week underlined)
May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input
July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests
Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals
Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started
Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input
Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision
Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision
May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot
(includes All published Amendments as of May 2009)
Nov 2009 – Recirc start
May 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days)
July 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start
(Include all published amendments as of July 2010)
November 2010 – Sponsor Recirc
March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval
June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

15. References Agenda: 11-09/1134r10 Minutes: 11-09/1190r0 Nov 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
References
Agenda: 11-09/1134r10
Minutes: 11-09/1190r0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/7 of 11-09/1291r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

16. TGp Closing Report Date: 2009-09-24 Author: Nov 2009 May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGp Closing Report
Date:
Author:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/4 of 11-09/1289r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)
Page 16
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
John Doe, Some Company

17. Abstract TGp closing report for November meetings Nov 2009 May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
TGp closing report for November meetings
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/4 of 11-09/1289r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)
Page 17
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
John Doe, Some Company

18. November Meetings Summary
LB158 completed since September meeting, passed, no new comments
Sponsor Ballot #0 started, will close on 22 November
Current comment resolution document, p, represents the 49 comments received as of Wednesday afternoon
4 time slots during the week
Majority of meeting time in discussions of key comments, not in voting on resolutions
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/4 of 11-09/1289r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

19. Status D9.0 is the current draft
Nov 2009
Status
D9.0 is the current draft
Waiting on ballot closing this weekend
TGp designated as P802.11p Comment Resolution Committee (CRC)
Weekly teleconferences planned for every 1500 Piscataway time will be CRC meetings
Plan is to complete comment resolution prior to January meetings
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/4 of 11-09/1289r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

20. TGs Atlanta Closing Report
May 2006
September 2009
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
doc.: IEEE /1091r0
Nov 2009
TGs Atlanta Closing Report
Date:
Author:
Name
Address
Affiliation
Phone
Dee Denteneer
HTC 37; 5656 AE Eindhoven; The Netherlands
Philips
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer
Page 20
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

21. Abstract TGs closing report for the November 2009 meeting.
May 2006
September 2009
doc.: IEEE /1091r0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
TGs closing report for the November 2009 meeting.
Resolved outstanding comments and ready to go to recirculation.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer
Page 21
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

22. Status TGs passed LB 147 with 79% approval rate (May 2009)
Nov 2009
Status
TGs passed LB 147 with 79% approval rate (May 2009)
Before the meeting:
Comment resolution spreadsheet 11-09/471r18 with 118 comments open
Most recent TGs Draft is D3.04
After meeting
Most recent TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-09/471r23, with resolutions to all comments
An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting in 11-09/1099r9
The TGs draft minutes will be uploaded as 11-09/1223r0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer

23. Next Steps Produce Draft 4.0 and go to recirculation
Nov 2009
Next Steps
Produce Draft 4.0 and go to recirculation
TGs is holding teleconferences on Wednesdays through the January Plenary at 4pm (ET)for up to 1½ hours on the Following Dates
December 2, January 6, January 13
Goal for the November 2009 TGs meeting in Los Angeles, USA:
Start resolving comments received in recirculation
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer

24. Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs TGs vote:
Nov 2009
Motion:
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot of at least 15 days asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs
TGs vote:
Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer

25. Approved by unanimous consent
Nov 2009
Moved to schedule TGs teleconferences on December 2 , January 6, and January 13 at 4pm for a maximum of 90 minutes to resolve comments and discuss agendas.
Approved by unanimous consent
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/6 of 11-09/1243r1 by Dee Denteneer

26. Closing Report Date: 2009-11-20 Authors: Nov 2009 May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/4 of 11-09/1279r2 by Stephen McCann, RIM
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

27. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for November 2009, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/4 of 11-09/1279r2 by Stephen McCann, RIM
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

28. Initial Sponsor Ballot (#0) progress
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
November 2009
Initial Sponsor Ballot (#0) progress
Initial meeting of TGu CRC
Resolved 83 technical comments this week, with 73 remaining
6 submissions presented and approved to resolve comments r5
Next sponsor re-circulation ballot in early January 2010
Teleconferences
Wednesdays at 11 ET (from 2nd December 2009)
Plans for January 2010
Review CRC sponsor ballot activities
Continue to resolve sponsor ballot comments
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/4 of 11-09/1279r2 by Stephen McCann, RIM
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

29. Expert Review List of 10 experts compiled (11-09-1271r0)
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
November 2009
Expert Review
List of 10 experts compiled ( r0)
Send out invitation s to participate
For positive responses, then send copies of IEEE u D8.0 for review and comments to further the draft (with time duration)
TGu chair will then place response comments into future re-circulation sponsor ballot.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/4 of 11-09/1279r2 by Stephen McCann, RIM
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

30. November 2009 Closing Report
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
November 2009 Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

31. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document contains the TGv closing report for November 2009.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

32. Goals and Accomplishments
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Goals and Accomplishments
Comment resolution from Initial Sponsor Ballot
327 comments, 208 resolutions completed, 119 remain
Teleconferences
Dec 1, 8, 15, Jan 12, noon-2pm Eastern
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

33. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Output Documents
v-TGv-November-2009-closing-report.ppt
v-November-2009-agenda.ppt
v-November-2009-meeting notes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

34. TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009
Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed
Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0
Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)
Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)
Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09 (was June 09)
Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09
Oct 09 – D7.0 (was Sept 09)
Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09
Jan 09 – D8.0, Feb D9.0, March D10.0, April D11.0
May 12th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval
Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010
RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 4th/June 5th(or so)
Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

35. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Goals for Nov 09 - Jan 2010
Complete initial Sponsor Ballot comment resolution
Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

36. References Nov 2009 May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0528r0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/7 of 11-09/1290r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

37. TGz Atlanta Closing Report
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGz Atlanta Closing Report
Date: 20 November 2009
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/2 of 11-09/1292r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

38. TGz Accomplishments in November
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGz Accomplishments in November
TGz made significant progress in reaching consensus on comments received on the initial sponsor ballot
The comments are in 11-09/1185r0
Text submissions are in 11-09/1218r4 (TDLS discovery), 11-09/1281r0 (TDLS path switch) and 11-09/1230r3 (Off-channel selection)
We expect to start a first recirculation sponsor ballot after the Los Angeles meeting in January
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/2 of 11-09/1292r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)
Page 38
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
John Doe, Some Company

39. May 2006
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /1003r0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Atlanta Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
Page 39
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Alex Ashley, NDS Ltd

40. May 2006
November 2007
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /2752r1
doc.: IEEE /1003r0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
TGaa Closing Report for the IEEE Atlanta, Georgia Session (November 2009)
Slide 40
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
Page 40
Page 40
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Alex Ashley, NDS Ltd
Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

41. Nov 2009
Goals for the session
Continue listening to technical proposals and adopting corresponding text into the TGaa draft
Joint meeting with ac on approaches to OBSS
Joint meeting with 802.1AVB
Resolve comments from Internal review of Draft D0.01/D0.02
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

42. Technical Presentations
Nov 2009
Technical Presentations
Document number
Title
Author(s)
1150/r1
Feedback-jamming Multicast ARQ results with capture effect
Jochen Miroll
1139/r3
OBSS Management Text
Graham Smith
1138/r2
Outline of Proposed OBSS Solution
1137/r1
EDCA Bandwidth Factor
1136/r1
AP Shut Out Neighborhood Effect
0926/r5
Interworking with 802.1Qat
Ganesh Venkatesan
1215/r0
Non-contentious (internal review) comments assigned to BrianH
Brian Hart
1251/r0
Intra-AC Prioritization Use Cases
Alex Ashley
1157/r1
Explain OBSS issue as well as possible simulation scenarios for OBSS in TGac
Takatori Yasushi
Slide 42
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

43. Accomplishments Listened to 9 technical presentations
Nov 2009
Accomplishments
Listened to 9 technical presentations
Adopted resolutions to some internal review comments into TGaa draft (1215r0)
Listened to the complete OBSS solution and adopted the corresponding (updated) text (1139r3)
Brainstormed on intra-AC prioritization Use Cases
Met jointly with 802.1AVB
Approved 09/926r5 as the guiding document describing the work that needs to be done in aa and 802.1Qat
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

44. May 2006
November 2007
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /2752r1
doc.: IEEE /1003r0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Joint meeting with 802.1AVB
Presented a solution to support 802.1Qat in (09/926r5)
Presented a draft version of changes to in order to support 802.1Qat in
Status Update on aa
Status Update on 802.1AVB
802.1AS may have up to 2 recirculations before starting sponsor ballot
802.1Qat has planned a recirculation before starting sponsor ballot
802.1Qav is ratified
Goals for the March 2010 joint meeting
Complete changes to in order to support 802.1Qat and have the changes included in a 11aa draft
Slide 44
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
Page 44
Page 44
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Alex Ashley, NDS Ltd
Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

45. Goals for the January Interim
Nov 2009
Goals for the January Interim
Enter January 2010 session with TGaa Draft 0.03
Adopt text corresponding to all remaining PAR topics into TGaa Draft in the January meeting
Work towards completing Draft 1.0 by March 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

46. Mondays 11:00-12:30 Hrs ET on the following days:
Nov 2009
Teleconferences
Mondays 11:00-12:30 Hrs ET on the following days:
Nov 30, 2009
Dec 14, 2009
Jan 11, 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 8/8 of 11-09/1269r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

47. TGac November 2009 Closing Report
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGac November 2009 Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/5 of 11-09/1277r1 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Page 47
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

48. May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGac for the November 2009 session.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/5 of 11-09/1277r1 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Page 48
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

49. Work Completed Selection of ad hoc group chairs is completed
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Work Completed
Selection of ad hoc group chairs is completed
PHY (Vinko Erceg, Minho Cheong, Raja Banerjea)
MAC (Matthew Fischer, Allan Zhu, Jae Seung Lee)
MU-MIMO (Brian Hart, Robert Stacey, Sameer Vermani)
Coexistence (Youhan Kim, Eldad Perahia, Yasushi Takatori)
Ad Hoc groups conducted their first meetings with focus on procedure discussion. Ad Hoc group reports are included in:
PHY  09/1261r0
MAC  09/1260r1
MU-MIMO  09/1262r0
Coexistence  09/1265r2
The TG accepted a new revision of the Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document (09/0451r8).
The TG agreed on an initial guideline for Ad Hoc scope (09/1175r1).
Technical Presentations.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/5 of 11-09/1277r1 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Page 49
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

50. May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
January 2010 Goals
Plan to continue with Ad Hoc group meetings with focus to further define the scope and work items for each ad hoc.
Submissions
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/5 of 11-09/1277r1 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Page 50
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

51. Conference Call Times December 3, 2009 December 17, 2009
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Conference Call Times
December 3, 2009
PHY Ad Hoc  21:00 -22:00 ET
December 17, 2009
MAC Ad Hoc  20:00 – 21:00 ET
MIMO-MU Ad Hoc  11:00 –12:00 ET
January 7, 2010
Coexistence Ad Hoc  20:00 – 22:00 ET
January 14, 2010
PHY Ad Hoc  11:00 -12:00 ET
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/5 of 11-09/1277r1 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Page 51
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

52. TGad November 2009 Closing Report
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
TGad November 2009 Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

53. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGad for the November 2009 session.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

54. Work Completed (1/2) Evaluation Methodology
Nov 2009
Work Completed (1/2)
Evaluation Methodology
09/1160, Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions, John Barr
09/1216, Internet traffic modeling, Sai Nandagopalan
09/1213, 60GHz Impairments Modeling, Vinko Erceg
09/1222r1, Hard disk drive traffic model, Eldad Perahia
09/1229, Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals, Alexander Maltsev
09/296r12, Update to Evaluation Methodology document, Eldad Perahia
09/1210, Coexistence Techniques, Tuncer Baykas
Motion to adopt 09/0296r12 as the first draft of the TGad evaluation methodology failed 24/20/7
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

55. Work Completed (2/2) Channel Modeling, Tues PM2, Wed PM2, Th AM2
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Work Completed (2/2)
Channel Modeling, Tues PM2, Wed PM2, Th AM2
09/1252, Inter Cluster Parameters of Living Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev
09/1152, 60-GHz Living-Room Channel Measurements, Tian-Wei Huang
09/1169, Human Body Blockage - Guidelines for TGad MAC development, Thomas Kürner
09/1170, Modeling the human induced 60 GHz channel dynamics, Thomas Kürner
09/1165, 60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity, Chris Hansen
09/1232, Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part2), Hirokazu Sawada
Other technical submissions
09/1153, 60GHz Beamforming, Carlos Cordeiro
09/1168, SCR Design and Performance Assessment, John Stine
Call for Proposals
Motion to adopt 09/1206r0 as the TGad call for proposals passed 50/0/19
Chair to announce in WG and reflector
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

56. Nov 2009
Call for Proposals
Two types of proposals
New Techniques
Complete Proposals
Definition in
Notification of intent to present: December 18, 2009
Must both TG chair and WG chair
Date applies to proposers of both New Techniques and Complete Proposals
For New Techniques presented in March 2010
Date that material must be on mentor: February 28, 2010
For New Techniques presented in May 2010
Date that material must be on mentor: May 2, 2010
For Complete Proposals presented in May 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

57. Goals for January 2010 Continue working on task group documents
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Goals for January 2010
Continue working on task group documents
Technical contributions
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

58. Conference call times Dec 10 Jan 7 10:00-12:00 ET
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Conference call times
Dec 10
10:00-12:00 ET
Evaluation Methodology
Jan 7
Channel Model
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/7 of 11-09/1117r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

59. IEEE 802.11 TV White Spaces Study Group Closing Report
May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
IEEE TV White Spaces Study Group Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Page 59
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

60. May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This presentation is the closing report for the Atlanta meeting of the IEEE TVWS SG.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Page 60
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

61. Agenda Introduction Administrative items including
Nov 2009
Agenda
Introduction
Administrative items including
Review and respond to the received comments on the TVWS PAR and 5C
tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c
Plan for the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Los Angeles [January 18th through 22nd]
Request teleconferences
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

62. Nov 2009
Accomplishments
Reviewed all of the received comments on the TVWS PAR and 5C
Responses in tvws-replies-to-comments-on tvws-par-5c
Edited the PAR and 5C document and uploaded it
tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c
Selected one teleconference slot to request
20:00 ET on January 12th
Discussed the plan for now until the January interim
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

63. Documents 11-09-1240-04-tvws-replies-to-comments-on-802-11-tvws-par-5c
Nov 2009
Documents
tvws-replies-to-comments-on tvws-par-5c
tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

64. Thanks to all who participated!
Nov 2009
Thanks to all who participated!
See you in LA
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/6 of 11-09/1286r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

65. QoSMAN SG Closing Report – Nov 2009
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
QoSMAN SG Closing Report – Nov 2009
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 65
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

66. May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the QoSMAN SG for the November 2009 session.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 66
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

67. May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Work Completed
Thanks to Stephen McCann as acting Secretary for the group.
Minutes:
Discussion on the process moving forward as a Task Group
Processed PAR and 5C comments:
Completed and accepted the PAR and 5C document
A Teleconference has been planned for January 14 at 11:00h ET.
Motions to approve PAR comment resolutions and PAR and 5C document.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 67
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

68. Motion to approve QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions
July 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Motion to approve QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions
Move to accept the QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions in document
Moved: Stephen McCann
Seconded: Paul Lambert
Vote: Yes – 6, No – 0, Abstain – 1.
Motion Passes.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 68
McCann et al. (RIM)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

69. May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
SG Motion
Believing that the QoSMAN PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,
Request that the QoSMAN PAR and the Five Criteria contained in document qm-qosman-par-nescom-form-plus-5cs.doc be forwarded to the WG for approval of the full Working Group.
Moved: Paul Lambert
Seconded: Stephen McCann
Vote: Yes – 6, No – 0, Abstain – 0.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 69
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

70. May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
WG Motion
Believing that the QoSMAN PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,
Request that the QoSMAN PAR and the Five Criteria contained in qm-qosman-par-nescom-form-plus-5cs.doc be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.
Moved by Michael Montemurro on behalf of the IEEE QOSMAN SG
QOSMAN SG vote:
Moved: Paul Lambert, Seconded: Stephen McCann, Result: 6-0-0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 70
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

71. Task Group Process Strawman
July 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Task Group Process Strawman
Prepare a Requirements Document
Consider use cases to justify requirements
Use previous submissions as a basis
Prioritize the requirements (mandatory/optional)
Solicit individual proposals
First Draft
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 71
McCann et al. (RIM)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

72. January 2009 Goals Begin work as a Task Group
May 2006
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
January 2009 Goals
Begin work as a Task Group
Elect Task Group Officers: Chair, Editor, and Secretary
Establish a timeline.
Create a requirements and use cases document for management frame prioritization.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 8/8 of 11-09/1211r1 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
Page 72
Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

73. Closing Report Date: 2009-11-20 Authors: Nov 2009 May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

74. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
Closing report for JTC1 ad hoc for November 2009, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

75. JTC1 ad hoc discussed the WAPI NP proposal & wrote two liaisons to SC6
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
JTC1 ad hoc discussed the WAPI NP proposal & wrote two liaisons to SC6
Progress in Atlanta
Discussed China NB’s proposal for a WAPI NP in ISO/IEC
Wrote letter ( r1) to SC6 responding to claims that isn insecure in the WAPI NP proposal
Wrote letter to SC6:
Reporting recent and planned future activities in the IEEE Working Group
Flagging an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process
Offering JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process
Plans for Jan 2010
Consider any JTC1 liaison issues
Start technical evaluation of WAPI
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

76. Nov 2009
JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes
Moved: David Hunter
Seconded: Jerry Thrasher
Result 11/0/0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

77. Nov 2009
WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE WG recommends to the IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes
Moved:
Seconded:
Result:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

78. Nov 2009
JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes.
Moved: Dan Harkins
Seconded: Jim Raab
Result 12/0/0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

79. Nov 2009
WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE WG recommends to IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes.
Moved:
Seconded:
Result:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 7/7 of 11-09/1284r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

80. IEEE 802.11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Closing Report
May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
IEEE Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 1/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Page 80
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

81. May 2006
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This presentation is the closing report for the Atlanta meeting of the IEEE Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 2/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Page 81
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

82. Agenda Introduction The regulatory summaries FOCUS: North America
Nov 2009
Agenda
Introduction
The regulatory summaries
North America
European Union
Asia
FOCUS:
Input to ERM TG11 on EN v1.8.1
FCC changes in the 5GHz band
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 3/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

83. Accomplishments Provided updates on relevant regulatory actions
Nov 2009
Accomplishments
Provided updates on relevant regulatory actions
Discussed the status of the revision of ERM TG11
Called for more participation to prevent unwanted regulations
Discussed the impact of new 5 GHz certification rules
FCC KDB
“devices will not permit operations on channels which overlap the MHz band”
Operation in 5250 – 5350 MHz and 5470 – 5725 MHz bands is restricted to indoor
With these stipulations, certification can begin again
Discussed the just released (17 November) Ofcom consultation on “Geolocation for Cognitive Access”
Responses due 9 February 2010
Will plan response on conference calls
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 4/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

84. Documents 11-09-1141-01-0reg-atlanta-meeting-plan-and-agenda-nov-2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 5/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

85. Thanks to all who participated!
Nov 2009
Thanks to all who participated!
See you in Atlanta
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
from slide 6/6 of 11-09/1287r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion