Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagdalen Fields Modified over 6 years ago
1
Testimony to House Education Reform Committee (February 23, 2017) Ben DeGrow, Director of Education Policy Mackinac Center for Public Policy
2
“CAP” Reports Why? Since 2012 How It Works
State Top-to-Bottom Rankings = Student Poverty > School Quality Context, not Substitute Since 2012 3 High School Editions 2 Elementary & Middle School How It Works Four years of state test scale scores Adjusted based on Free Lunch rates CAP Score 100 = Meet Expectations Letter Grades = Curved Distribution
3
Notable Results Star International Academy (Dearborn Heights) = #1 High School 3 times running 2 DPS charter schools at top of Elem. / Middle School rankings Selective admission schools strong Some suburban schools outperform others Some urban, rural schools beating odds of poverty
4
“Next Level of Accountability” Schools by CAP Grades
70% Congruence 27 of 38 in our Bottom 5% Notable exceptions 1 A school: Thirkell Elementary (DPS) 2 C schools: Ann Arbor Trail Magnet (DPS) & K-zoo Writers Academy Should inform priority of closures / interventions
5
New Measures Can Add Precision
Limitations of Public Data Free Lunch numbers may be imprecise School-level average scale scores by test-year New System: Objective, reliable and balanced data Testing proficiency and growth two largest (but not only) factors Key completion rates, not correlations
6
Keep Parents in Conversation
Statewide A-to-F school grades Single summative grade backed by robust data to drive broader conversations about school improvement Parents and others looking for more data also should be able to easily find answers to: What went into this grade? How did comparable schools do? What else do I need to know? Failing school interventions & options Honoring parent voice: What drives decisions?
8
Make Growth Measures Meaningful
Grade-level differentiation Elementary & Middle more weight on growth overall High school balance growth and proficiency Growth tied to objective standards, not vs. peers? General growth + extra weight for Bottom & Top 25%
9
Ben DeGrow Director of Education Policy Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.