Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Chapter 22 Opener Structural changes accompany changes in function
Evolution-2e-Chapter-22-Opener.jpg
2
Figure Averaged over long periods, the rate of evolution may be low, even though there are episodes of rapid evolution Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
3
Figure Averaged over long periods, the rate of evolution may be low, even though there are episodes of rapid evolution Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
4
Figure An example of stasis: specimens of the bivalve Macrocallista maculata from a living population and from fossil deposits dated at 1, 2, 4, and 17 Mya Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
5
Figure 22.3 A quantitative expression of stasis in shell characters of bivalves in the fossil record
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
6
Figure A quantitative expression of stasis in shell characters of bivalves in the fossil record (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
7
Figure A quantitative expression of stasis in shell characters of bivalves in the fossil record (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
8
Figure A comparison of empirically measured rates of character evolution with results from several models Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
9
Figure A comparison of empirically measured rates of character evolution with results from several models (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
10
Figure A comparison of empirically measured rates of character evolution with results from several models (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
11
Figure A comparison of empirically measured rates of character evolution with results from several models (Part 3) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
12
Figure A comparison of empirically measured rates of character evolution with results from several models (Part 4) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
13
Figure 22.5 An example offered by Richard Goldschmidt as a possible case of saltational evolution
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
14
Figure Two very different taxa may have evolved gradually from a common ancestor, even though no form precisely intermediate between them ever existed Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
15
Figure A model of the evolution of color pattern in Müllerian mimics such as Heliconius butterflies Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
16
Figure A model of the evolution of color pattern in Müllerian mimics such as Heliconius butterflies Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
17
Figure 22.8 Two “living fossils”
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
18
Figure 22.9 Adaptive genetic changes may restrict subsequent evolutionary potential
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
19
Figure 22.9 Adaptive genetic changes may restrict subsequent evolutionary potential (Part 1)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
20
Figure 22.9 Adaptive genetic changes may restrict subsequent evolutionary potential (Part 2)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
21
Figure 22.10 Complex structures, if lost, are generally not regained, but their function may be
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
22
Figure The right hand (in dorsal view) of two members of the bear family, a brown bear (left) and the giant panda (right) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
23
Figure The propensity for evolutionary changes to be in directions close to the axis of greatest phenotypic variation (in the marine ostracode crustacean Poseidonamicus) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
24
Figure The propensity for evolutionary changes to be in directions close to the axis of greatest phenotypic variation (in the marine ostracode crustacean Poseidonamicus) (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
25
Figure The propensity for evolutionary changes to be in directions close to the axis of greatest phenotypic variation (in the marine ostracode crustacean Poseidonamicus) (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
26
Figure A lungless bolitoglossine salamander (Hydromantes supramontis) captures prey with its extraordinarily long tongue Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
27
Figure 22.14 Intermediate stages in the evolution of complex eyes
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
28
Figure 22.14 Intermediate stages in the evolution of complex eyes (Part 1)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
29
Figure 22.14 Intermediate stages in the evolution of complex eyes (Part 2)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
30
Figure 22.14 Intermediate stages in the evolution of complex eyes (Part 3)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
31
Figure A schematic representation of a modular organization of the phenotype and its genetic basis Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
32
Figure Two ways in which interactions among suites of genes and characters can evolve by changes in pleiotropic effects Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
33
Figure Two ways in which interactions among suites of genes and characters can evolve by changes in pleiotropic effects Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
34
Figure 22.17 Computer simulations of the diversification of a clade
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
35
Figure 22.18 A passive trend: Cope’s rule in Late Cretaceous North American mammals
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
36
Figure 22.18 A passive trend: Cope’s rule in Late Cretaceous North American mammals
Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
37
Figure 22.19 A driven trend: Cope’s rule in the horse family, Equidae
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
38
Figure 22.20 A trend caused by species selection
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
39
Figure A phylogeny of some genera in the mustard family (Brassicaceae) reveals that DNA content (C-value) has both increased and decreased Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
40
Figure A phylogeny of some genera in the mustard family (Brassicaceae) reveals that DNA content (C-value) has both increased and decreased Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
Similar presentations
