Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Commissioning is no longer what it used to be: Installation and Operational Qualification (IQ/OQ) for an Electron Beam Plant Florent KUNTZ1, Benoît MULLIER2,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Commissioning is no longer what it used to be: Installation and Operational Qualification (IQ/OQ) for an Electron Beam Plant Florent KUNTZ1, Benoît MULLIER2,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Commissioning is no longer what it used to be: Installation and Operational Qualification (IQ/OQ) for an Electron Beam Plant Florent KUNTZ1, Benoît MULLIER2, Hervé MICHEL3 1 Aerial-CRT, Illkirch France 2IBA, Louvain la neuve, Belgium 3Synergy Health, Däniken, Switzerland

2 Outline Introduction - Relevant standards/guides
Description of a standard process Installation Qualification tests Operational Qualification tests Example of IQ results Example of OQ results Conclusion

3 Introduction – Relevant standard/guides
ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ISO/ASTM 51649:2005 ASTM E Installation Qualification To demonstrate that the irradiator has been supplied and installed in accordance with its specifications Operational Qualification To demonstrate that the irradiator, as installed, is capable of operating and delivering appropriate doses within defined acceptance criteria Sterilization of health care products—Radiation— Part 1: Requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices Part 3: Guidance on dosimetric aspects

4 Description of a standard process
Installation Qualification Tests 1 ENERGY/CURRENT (8.2) (8.6) (8.5) ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ISO/ASTM 51649:2005 SPOT SIZE 2 SCAN WIDTH 3 SCAN UNIFORMITY PARALLELISM* 4 * optional PRODUCT CENTERING 5 CONVEYOR SPEED 6

5 Operational Qualification Tests
Homogeneous material (various densities) ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ISO/ASTM 51649:2005 ASTM E Dose distribution Surface (9.3.4) Product Height dependence (9.3.5) Inside material (side effect, material effect) (9.3.4, 9.3.8) Absorbed dose as function of conveyor speed, beam current, scan width, …(9.3.5) Dose variability / reproducibility (9.3.5) Process interruption/Restart for both conveyor and electron beam (9.3.6) Single sided and double sided all routine processing parameters

6 IQ/OQ Tests – Prerequisites
Acceptance criteria (energy, current, scan width, speed, …) Definition of requalification interval Dosimetry systems, tools, … Physical measurements (Electrical, Time, Distance, …)  calibration / uncertainty Tolerance Interval Measured data

7 Example of IQ results Electron Beam Energy (8.2) Electron Beam CTA
Dosimeter CTA strip 2-piece Al Wedge

8 Example of IQ results Electron Beam Energy (8.2) Density : 2.711 g/cm3
Angle : °

9 A3.14 from ISO/ASTM 51649 standard
Example of IQ results CTA strip Electron Beam Energy (8.2) A3.14 from ISO/ASTM standard

10 Example of IQ results Conveyor Speed (8.2) Laser counter / Stop watch
Before and after the beam stop ?

11 Example of IQ results Conveyor Speed (8.2) Empty Tray 60 kg charge
Target Speed (m/min) Average Measured speed (m/min) Difference between Measured and Target at 95 % 2,00 2,01 +/- 0,01 1,5 % 6,00 6,05 +/- 0,03 1,8 % 10,00 10,07 +/- 0,04 60 kg charge Target Speed (m/min) Average Measured speed (m/min) Difference between Measured and Target at 95 % 2,00 2,01 +/- 0,01 1,5 % 6,00 6,04 +/- 0,04 2,0 % 10,00 10,09 +/- 0,07 2,3 %

12 Example of IQ results Scan width/uniformity (8.2) What is the issue ?

13 Example of IQ results Scan width/uniformity (8.2)
CTA strip Courtesy of BGS - Germany

14 Example of IQ results Scan width/uniformity (8.2)
Length (mm) Dose (kGy) Courtesy of BGS - Germany

15 Example of IQ results Spot size (Scan length) (8.2)
What is the issue ? FWHM at height of 30cm FWHM at height of 60cm FWHM at height of 5cm CTA strip Courtesy of BGS - Germany

16 Example of IQ results Product height (8.2) What is the issue ?

17 Example of IQ results Product height FWT 60 2p

18 Example of IQ results Product height

19 Example of OQ Results Dose distribution Surface (9.3.4)
Inside material (various densities) (9.3.4, 9.3.8)

20 Example of OQ Results Dose distribution
Inside material (various densities) GEX Windose

21 Surface dose distribution
 Dsurf +/- 5% (at 3 sigma) Courtesy of BGS - Germany

22 Dose distribution inside material
Single sided Irradiation Density 0.07 g/cm3

23 Dose distribution inside material
Single sided Irradiation Density 0.07 g/cm3 Depth 0 g/cm² Density 0.07 g/cm3 Depth 3.7 g/cm² Courtesy of BGS - Germany

24 (different densities)
Dose distribution inside adjacent material (different densities) Courtesy of BGS - Germany

25 Example of OQ Results Absorbed dose as function of conveyor speed, beam current, scan width (9.3.5) Alanine, GEX, FWT dosimeters Alanine FWT 60 2p GEX Windose DoseSurf = K I V . Wb

26 Absorbed dose as function of conveyor speed, beam current, scan width (9.3.5)
I / (Speed*SW) in mA.min/m2 Absorbed Surface Dose in kGy Dsurf = 10,77 * (I/(V*Wb)) + 0,04  K = 10,77 kGy.m2/(mA.min) Courtesy of BGS - Germany

27 Absorbed dose as function of conveyor speed, beam current, scan width (9.3.5)
Redisue in % I / Speed in mA.min/m RMS = 1.7 % Courtesy of BGS - Germany

28 With routine dosimetry system !
Example of OQ Results Dose variability / reproducibility (9.3.5) With routine dosimetry system ! Target Dose Irradiation 1 in kGy (CV%) Irradiation 2 Irradiation 3 Average Dose 12 kGy 11,93 +/- 0,18 (1,5%) 11,81 +/- 0,28 (2,3%) 11,74 +/- 0,20 (1,7%) 11,83 +/- 0,22 (1,9%) 30 kGy 29,59 +/- 0,48 (1,6%) 29,80 +/- 0,61 (2,0%) 30,99 +/- 0,50 (1,6%) 30,07 +/- 0,82 (2,7%) 62 kGy 63,67 +/- 1,30 (2,0%) 62,98 +/- 0,97 (1,5%) 62,77 +/- 0,55 (0,9%) 63,14 +/- 0,98 (1,6%)

29 Example of OQ results Process interruption/Restart Conveyor (9.3.6)
CTA strip Process interruption/Restart Conveyor (9.3.6)

30 Process interruption/Restart
Conveyor Stop Courtesy of BGS - Germany

31 Process interruption/Restart
Conveyor Stop  Uniformity better than +/- 5 % Courtesy of BGS - Germany

32 Conclusion : What is commissioning?
IQ/OQ of the irradiation plant follow : ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ANSI/AAMI/ISO :2006 ISO/ASTM 51649:2005 ASTM E +  Knowledge of the process Capacity of plant of delivering appropriate doses within defined acceptance criteria Help for process uncertainty assessment

33 Commissioning is no longer what it used to be: Installation and Operational Qualification (IQ/OQ) for an Electron Beam Plant Thank you very much ! Florent KUNTZ1, Benoît MULLIER2, Hervé MICHEL3 1 Aerial-CRT, Illkirch France 2IBA, Louvain la neuve, Belgium 3Synergy Health, Däniken, Switzerland


Download ppt "Commissioning is no longer what it used to be: Installation and Operational Qualification (IQ/OQ) for an Electron Beam Plant Florent KUNTZ1, Benoît MULLIER2,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google