Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Intergovernmental Transfers: Theory and Practice

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Intergovernmental Transfers: Theory and Practice"— Presentation transcript:

1 Intergovernmental Transfers: Theory and Practice
Roy Bahl Dean, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Georgia State University The World Bank May 8-10, 2006 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

2 Basic Approaches To Decentralization
Revenue-Sharing Model (Weak Decentralization) Grants Shared Taxes “Minor” Local Taxes Revenue Assignment Model (Strong Decentralization) Significant Local Taxes (Autonomy) Loans User Charges 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

3 Intergovernmental Transfers
Rule’s (Cont’d) 8. Grants and shared taxes must play an important role in almost any decentralized fiscal system in a developing or transition country. Transfers may be designed as more centralized or more decentralized. 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

4 How Can Intergovernmental Transfers be Decentralizing?
Revenue Adequacy Certainty Unconditional 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

5 How Can Intergovernmental Transfers be Centralizing
No transparency in vertical sharing Ad hoc distributions Uncertainty and year-to-year changes Strict Conditions 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

6 Justifications for Intergovernmental Transfers
Close the “fiscal gap” Equalize fiscal capacity and need Adjust for spillovers Political reasons 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

7 Equalizing Fiscal Capacity What Do We Equalize?
Revenue Capacity Expenditure Needs Needs-Capacity Gap 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

8 Calculating a Needs-Resource Gap: The Needs
Needs-resources gap (G) might be defined more precisely as (1) where where = the amount of expenditure needed to provide a minimum acceptable level of (assigned) services in local government i. =the revenue that would be raised from own sources at “normal” effort in local government i. The vertical share (VS) is equal to VS = (2) Where α is the percent of the needs-resources gap that the central government proposes to cover with the transfer, and CR is the total amount of revenue (or tax revenue) raised by the central (or state) government. 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

9 Adjusting for Spillovers
Importance of spillovers Alternatives to transfers Getting public sector “prices” right Varying price with capacity 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

10 How To Design A Grant System
12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

11 How Should The Grant System Be Structured?
Alternative Form of Intergovernmental Grant Programs Method of determining the total divisible pool Method of allocating The divisible pool Among eligible units Specified share of National or state Government tax Ad Hoc Decision Reimbursement Approved Expenditures Origin of collection of tax A NA Formula B F Total or partial reimbursement of costs C G K Ad Hoc D H 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

12 Natural Resource Revenue Sharing: The Case for More Centralization
The Stability Argument The Disparities Argument The Local Capacity Argument The National Treasure Argument 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

13 Natural Resource Revenue Sharing: The Case for More Decentralization
The Cost Reimbursement Argument The Heritage Argument The Conflict Resolution Argument 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

14 Intergovernmental Grants: How Not To Do It!
Deficit Grants Complicated Formulae No Transparency No Continuity Base It On The Amount Spent No Evaluation 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers

15 Intergovernmental Grant Lessons
Desired outcomes should drive design One grant/transfer instrument cannot accomplish multiple objectives. Expect changes in formula over time Is “distributable pool” a discretionary element in the central budget or an entitlement of local government? 12/7/2018 Intergovernmental Transfers


Download ppt "Intergovernmental Transfers: Theory and Practice"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google