Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Probing New Physics with Neutral Current Measurements

Published byIda Widjaja Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Probing New Physics with Neutral Current Measurements"— Presentation transcript:

1 Probing New Physics with Neutral Current Measurements
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona

2 Outline Precision measurements vs. direct detection
- Precision measurements vs. direct detection Neutral current measurements parity violating electron scattering ee Moller scattering (SLAC E158) ep elastic scattering (Jlab Qweak) atomic parity violation (APV) neutrino-nucleus deep inelastic scattering (NuTeV) - proble new physics beyond SM - some QCD issue - future experiments Conclusion S. Su subZ2004

3 Precision measurements vs. direct detection
- mt=178.0  4.3 GeV (direct) (indirect) Direct vs. indirect detection provide complementary information success of SM consistency check of any new physics scenario LEP EWWG LEP EWWG 2004 winter S. Su subZ2004

4 Low energy precision measurements
address questions difficult to study at high energy weak interactions (parity violation) high precision low energy experiment available - muon g-2: M=m , new  2x10-9, exp < 10-9 -decay, -decay: M=mW , new  10-3, exp  10-3 parity-violating electron scattering: M=mW , new  10-3, 1/QWe,p 10 more sensitive to new physics need exp  “easier” experiment - size of loop effects from new physics: (/)(M/Mnew)2 QWe,p  1-4 sin2W  0.1 probe new physics off the Z-resonance - sensitive to new physics not mix with Z S. Su subZ2004

5 Neutral Current: Test of sin2W running
- Weak mixing angle sinW courtesy of Erler and Carlini MS g sinW = g’ cosW = e Norval Fortson:APV Bob McKeown: ee (E158) Shelley Page: ep (Qweak) Kevin McFarland: (NuTeV) In addition Janet Conrad (Friday): reactor based -e- scattering Talk in neutral current session - sin2W(0) - sin2W(mZ2) = - QWCs: agree Q2=0 E158 Runs I+II (Preliminary) NuTeV APV(Cs) - NuTeV: +3 Q2=20 (GeV)2 Weak mixing angle sin2W parity-violating electron scattering (PVES) Q2=0.03 (GeV)2 - ee Moller scattering (SLAC) QWe - ep elastic scattering (J-lab) QWp Anticipated final errors ee E158 ep Qweak  sin2W  scale Q (GeV) S. Su subZ2004

6 NC exp as a indirect probe of new physics
- SM is a low energy approximation of a more fundamental theory NC exp:  consistency check of SM  complementary to direct new physics searches  distinguish various new physics SUSY: minimal Supersymmetric extension of SM (MSSM) each SM particle superpartner - with R-parity : loop corrections - without R-parity: tree-level contribution extra Z’ - exists in extension of SM - constraints from Z-pole observable (mix with Z) leptoquark extra-dimension … spin differ by ½ S. Su subZ2004

7 PVES:E158 and Qweak A N+-N- ALR  QWf N++N- V geA = Ie3
weak charge QWf = 2gfV = 2 If3 -4Qfs2 ep Qweak exp QWp ee Moller exp QWe QWe,p tree 1-4s2 -(1-4s2) QWe,p loop exp precision 4% 9%  sin2W SM running 10  8  clean environment: Hydrogen target theoretically clean: small hadronic uncertainties tree level  0.1  sensitive to new physics QWCs :  sin2W = NuTeV:  sin2W = S. Su subZ2004

8 Sensitivity to new physics scale
- Ramsey-Musolf(1999) O(1) : new physics scale Take  QWp=4% courtesy of Carlini Non-perturbative theory g » 2   » 29 TeV Extra Z’ (GUT) g » mZ’ » 2.1 TeV probe new physics scale comparable to LHC confirmation of LHC discovery (couplings, charges) S. Su subZ2004

9 MSSM correction to weak charge
- QWf =  (2Tf3 - 4Qf  s2) + f Kurylov, Ramsey-Musolf, Su (2003) QWe and QWp correlated dominant :  (<0) negative shift in sin2W MSSM  (QWp)SUSY / (QWp)SM < 4%,  (QWe)SUSY / (QWe)SM < 8% S. Su subZ2004

10 R-parity violating (RPV)
RPV operators contribute to QWe,p at tree level Kurylov, Ramsey-Musolf, Su (2003) Exp constraints  decay: |Vud| =  APV(Cs):  QWCs =  Re/ :  Re/ =  G:  G =  RPV 95% CL MSSM loop QpW No SUSY dark matter I) Obtain 95% CL allowed region in RPV coefficients II) Evaluate  QWe and  QWp G S. Su subZ2004

11 Correlation between QWp , QWe
- Distinguish new physics Erler, Kurylov and Ramsey-Musolf (2003) exp MSSM: extra Z’: RPV SUSY leptoquark  QWp  QWe SM Distinguish via APV QWCs Combinations of NC exps could be used to distinguish various new physics S. Su subZ2004

12 ? Extract QWp use kinematics to simplify: at forward angle 
- use kinematics to simplify: at forward angle  ? Musolf et. al., (1994) measure F(,q2) over finite range in q2, extrapolate F to small q2 existing PVES: SAMPLE, HAPPEX, G0, A4 minimize effect of F by making q2 small q2  0.03 GeV2, still enough statistics   QpW / QpW | hadronic effects  2 % S. Su subZ2004

13 QCD correction to ep scattering
- Box diagram contribution to QWP Erler, Kurylov and Ramsey-Musolf (2003) e p Z e p W e p Z e p Z suppression non-calculable Similar to nuclear -decay e e- n p W  QWP 26% 3% 6% kloop » O(mW) kloop » O(mZ) QCD  kloop  O(mZ) |CW|  (CKM unitarity) |CZ|  2 non-perturbative using OPE (pQCD)  QWP (QCD) -0.7% -0.08% 0.65% Total theoretical uncertainty » 0.8% S. Su subZ2004

14 Outlook: PV electron scattering
- Kurylov, Ramsey-Musolf, Su (2003) MSSM RPV Erler NuTeV Linear Collider e-e- sin2W DIS-Parity,JLab DIS-Parity, SLAC APV e+e- LEP, SLD SLAC E158 (ee) JLab Moller (ee) JLab QWeak (ep) Q (GeV) S. Su subZ2004

15 Atomic parity violation
- Two approaches rotation of polarization plane of linearly polarized light apply external E field  parity forbidden atomic transition Boulder group: cesium APV 0.35% exp uncertainty wood et. Al. (1997) QW(Z,N)=(2Z+N)QWu+(Z+2N)QWd ¼ Z(1-4 sin2W)-N ¼ -N finite nuclear size nucleon substructure nuclear spin-dependent term  »  0.15% Pollock and Wieman (2001) Musolf (1994) Erler, Kurylov and Ramsey-Musolf (2003) atomic structure 1% Blundell et. al. (1990, 1992) Dzuba et. Al. (1989) reduced error 0.6% (exp + theory) via transit dipole amplitude measurement Bennett and Wieman (1999) + 2.5  deviation (2002) Breit interaction  Derevianko (2000), Dzuba et. al. (2001) Uehling potential  Johnson et. al. (2001), Milstein et. al. (2002) QED self-energy and vertex  Dzuba et. Al. (2002), Kuchiev and Flambaum (2002), Milstein et. al. (2002) QWCs (exp) =  QWCs(SM)= agree S. Su subZ2004

16 Sensitivity to new physics
- Distinguish new physics  QW (Z,N)=(2Z+N)  QWu +(2N+Z)  QWd  QWu >0  QWd <0   QW(Z,N) / QW(Z,N) < 0.2 % for Cs MSSM exp MSSM: extra Z’:  QWp  QWe  QWCs small sizable SM Erler, Kurylov and Ramsey-Musolf (2003) S. Su subZ2004

17 Outlook -- APV Paris group: more precise Cs APV
Seattle group: Ba+ APV 6S1/2  5D3/2 Berkeley group: isotope Yb APV eliminate large atomic structure theory uncertainties 0.2% uncertainties comparable to QWp in sensitivity to new physics Ramsey-Musolf(1999) S. Su subZ2004

18 NuTeV experiment NC CC gL,R2=(uL,R)2+(dL,R)2
- NC CC gL,R2=(uL,R)2+(dL,R)2 R=  R=  - exp fit: (gLeff)2=0.30050.0014, (gReff)2=0.03100.0011 SM EW fit: (gLeff)2=0.3042, (gReff)2=0.0301 S. Su subZ2004

19 NuTeV anomaly … exp fit (=1): sin2Won-shell = 0.2277  0.0016
SM fit to Z-pole: sin2Won-shell =  (3  away) To explain NuTeV anomaly nuclear shadowing Miller and Thomas (2002), Zeller et. Al. (2002), Kovalenkov, schmidt and Yang (2002) asymmetry in strange sea distribution Davidson, Forte, Gambino, Rius and Strumia (2002), Goncharov et. al. (2001) isospin symmetry breaking Bodek et. al. (1999), Zeller et. Al. (2002) QCD corrections Dobrescu and Ellis (2003), Kretzer et. al. (2003), Davidson et. al. (2002) … S. Su subZ2004

20 New physics explanation
- Difficult ! Supersymmetry:  R,   0 Kurylov, Ramsey-Musolf, Su (2003), Davidson, Forte, Gambino, Rius and Strumia (2002) Extra Z’ : family non-universal, finetuning Langacker and Plumacher (2000) Leptoquark: tune mass splitting Davidson, Forte, Gambino, Rius and Strumia (2002)  mixing with extra heavy neutrino: constraints from other observables Babu and Pati (2002), Loinaz et. al. (2003) - MSSM RPV reactor based -e- scattering  sin2W Conrad, Link and Shaevitz (2004) (Janet Conrad, Friday) - S. Su subZ2004

21 Conclusion NC exp: precision measurements of sin2W at low energy
- NC exp: precision measurements of sin2W at low energy - PV ee, ep scattering (E158, Qweak) - APV measurements - NuTeV consistency check of SM sensitive to new physics complementary to direct searches combinations of several NC exp  distinguish various new physics uncertainties caused by QCD - extract from experimental measurements - SM predictions S. Su subZ2004

22 Talks in this workshop Talk in neutral current session
- Norval Fortson:APV Bob McKeown: ee (E158) Shelley Page: ep (Qweak) Kevin McFarland: (NuTeV) In addition Janet Conrad (Friday): reactor based -e- scattering Talk in neutral current session - S. Su subZ2004

Download ppt "Probing New Physics with Neutral Current Measurements"

Similar presentations

1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.

1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.

Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
IV. Low Energy Probes of SUSY J Erler (UNAM) A Kurylov (Caltech) C Lee (Caltech) S Su (Arizona) P Vogel (Caltech) G Prezeau (Caltech) V Cirigliano (Caltech)

IV. Low Energy Probes of SUSY J Erler (UNAM) A Kurylov (Caltech) C Lee (Caltech) S Su (Arizona) P Vogel (Caltech) G Prezeau (Caltech) V Cirigliano (Caltech)
SUSY can affect scattering Parity-Violating electron scattering “Weak Charge” ~ 1 - 4 sin 2  W ~ 0.1.

SUSY can affect scattering Parity-Violating electron scattering “Weak Charge” ~ sin 2  W ~ 0.1.
TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.

TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.
P. Langacker ICHEP2004 (8/16/04) Low Energy Electroweak Precision Tests Perspective –Motivations –Precision program WNC experiments Universality EDMs,

P. Langacker ICHEP2004 (8/16/04) Low Energy Electroweak Precision Tests Perspective –Motivations –Precision program WNC experiments Universality EDMs,
PVDIS at 11 GeV with SoLID. PV Electron Scattering 2 (g A e g V T +  g V e g A T ) to g V is a function of sin 2  W Parity-violating electron scattering.

PVDIS at 11 GeV with SoLID. PV Electron Scattering 2 (g A e g V T +  g V e g A T ) to g V is a function of sin 2  W Parity-violating electron scattering.
Yingchuan Li Weak Mixing Angle and EIC INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider Energies Sep. 17th 2010.

Yingchuan Li Weak Mixing Angle and EIC INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider Energies Sep. 17th 2010.
Hunting for New Particles & Forces. Example: Two particles produced Animations: QPJava-22.html u u d u d u.

Hunting for New Particles & Forces. Example: Two particles produced Animations: QPJava-22.html u u d u d u.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.

K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
Cultural Interlude Emlyn Hughes Caltech DOE HEP Review July 21, 2004 Final Results from SLAC Experiment E158 “Measurement of the Electroweak Mixing Angle”

Cultural Interlude Emlyn Hughes Caltech DOE HEP Review July 21, 2004 Final Results from SLAC Experiment E158 “Measurement of the Electroweak Mixing Angle”
Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.

Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.
Electric Dipole Moment Goals and “New Physics” William J. Marciano 12/7/09 d p with 10 -29 e-cm sensitivity! Why is it important?

Electric Dipole Moment Goals and “New Physics” William J. Marciano 12/7/09 d p with e-cm sensitivity! Why is it important?
ICHEP04 Beijing Global Electroweak fits and constraints on the Higgs mass Pete Renton Aug 2004 GLOBAL ELECTROWEAK FITS AND CONSTRAINTS ON THE HIGGS MASS.

ICHEP04 Beijing Global Electroweak fits and constraints on the Higgs mass Pete Renton Aug 2004 GLOBAL ELECTROWEAK FITS AND CONSTRAINTS ON THE HIGGS MASS.
Search for R-parity violating Supersymmetric effects in the neutron beta decay N. Yamanaka (Osaka University) 2009 年 8 月 12 日 at KEK In collaboration with.

Search for R-parity violating Supersymmetric effects in the neutron beta decay N. Yamanaka (Osaka University) 2009 年 8 月 12 日 at KEK In collaboration with.
One-loop analysis of the 4-Femi contribution to the Atomic EDM within R-parity violating MSSM N. YAMANAKA (Osaka University) 2010/8/9 Sigma Hall Osaka.

One-loop analysis of the 4-Femi contribution to the Atomic EDM within R-parity violating MSSM N. YAMANAKA (Osaka University) 2010/8/9 Sigma Hall Osaka.
Electroweak Physics at an EIC: Theory Prospects M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison NPAC Theoretical.

Electroweak Physics at an EIC: Theory Prospects M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison NPAC Theoretical.
Precision Electroweak Physics and QCD at an EIC M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison NPAC Theoretical.

Precision Electroweak Physics and QCD at an EIC M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Wisconsin-Madison NPAC Theoretical.
Looking Through The Mirror: Parity Violation in the Future M.J. Ramsey-Musolf + many students, post- docs, collaborators, and colleagues.

Looking Through The Mirror: Parity Violation in the Future M.J. Ramsey-Musolf + many students, post- docs, collaborators, and colleagues.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google