1. Kimberly Keller, Ph.D. University of Missouri
Putting Results Together in Missouri SNAP-Ed What can we say about SNAP-Ed results?
Kimberly Keller, Ph.D.
University of Missouri

2. SNAP-Ed in Missouri
Missouri Department of Social Services as State Agency
University of Missouri Extension as State Implementing Agency
Subcontract with Operation Food Search (Cooking Matters)
MOCAN partnership (Missouri Council on Activity and Nutrition)
Coverage to all 114 counties and the city of St. Louis
Direct education
PSE work

3. Guiding principles behind our report
Report must be meaningful and accessible to a wide range of audiences
Balance:
Program descriptions
Program-specific data
Success stories
Where our state fits regionally and nationally

4. [slide will have eval framework and which indicators we’re reporting]

5. Social-Ecological Model
Dietary Guidelines for Americans,

6. First decisions: Individual Level
Lead with indicator name
Provide narrative description with indicator number
Challenge: how best to display survey results
Visual depiction of change
Quantitative measure

7. Environmental Settings
More narrative
Charts and graphs provide “pops” of data

8. Sectors of Influence
Very narrative
Incorporate secondary data

9. Population Results
Exclusively secondary data: Community Commons
State, regional, national data

10. Challenges
New reporting formats are challenging… but create opportunities
Data infrastructure
Team effort
Program expertise
Data expertise
Communications expertise
Design expertise

11. Where do we go from here?
How can we leverage data and existing reporting structures to communicate SNAP-Ed accomplishments?
How do we craft our communications to reflect common message about SNAP-Ed efforts?
What do we need to help make these things happen?