1. Priority List of Data Sets for eReporting Proposal for extension, Issues
Gabriele Vincze, 23 November 2017

2. Proposal - extension of the priority data list
Reporting obligation
More details/information provided; all relevant data sets listed
Links to other reporting requirements included
Reported spatial data / reporting guidelines
Information if spatial data reporting guidelines are available (link)
Information to reported data sets and listing of reported datasest
INSPIRE Annex & Spatial Data Theme
Assignement of relevant spatial data theme(s)

3. Proposal - extension of the priority data list

4. Proposal - extension of the priority data list
Further information helpful/needed per data set?
Frequency of reporting / next deadline
Data format
Metadata tag >> see presentation later today
Data domain (nature, water, noise, …)
Geographic extent (nation wide data set; federal state data set) …?

5. Issues – Data listing and data set identification
Overwiew & more details
Overview list: includes all relevant data sets
Extended lists: include more information separated by env. domain (air, noise, natuer, water, …)
Numbering of list enries / data sets
Link to „master table“ (based upon Reporting Fitness Check) or extended list including more in depth information
Data not reported by MS – stay in the list?
Biogeographical regions made and provided by EEA

6. Issues – metadata tagging, linked approach
Reported data and INSPIRE „as is“ data sets
1 INSPIRE data set includes data relevant for more than one reporting process/obligation
Example AT – water quality monitoring stations
Online available data sets include the complete monitoring network available since monitoring began; data are used for WFD reporting, Nitrate Directive reporting, WISE-SoE
1 INSPIRE data set includes data of more than one reporting period
Example AT
FFH & Bird directive
WFD drinking water protection areas

7. Issues – Metadata tagging, linked approach
Reported data and INSPIRE „as is“ data sets
1 reported data set but more than one nationally/regionally available INSPIRE data sets
Depending on national classification of data, purpose of data collection, responsible organisations and different national or federal responsibilities
Example AT – water quality monitoring stations (nation wide data sets)
Reporting: 1 data set including surface water quality monitoring sites and groundwater quality & quantity monitoring sites
INSPIRE: different data sets according to media and monitoring purpose – surface water, groundwater, water quality, water quantity etc

8. Issues – Metadata tagging, linked approach
Reported data and INSPIRE „as is“ data sets
1 reported data set but more than one nationally/regionally available INSPIRE data sets
Example AT – CDDA, linked approach (nation wide and regional data sets)
Xml data provided as nation wide data set (type1 data)
Spatial data (gml) provided by federal states (type2 data); federal states have different approaches – either 1 data set including all relevant CDDA areas or separate data sets according to protected area type; will be > 9 data sets

9. Issues - implementation challenge
Reporting responsibility / INSPIRE implementation responsibility
Different state bodies or federal bodies, depending on the ownership / reference version of the data
Example AT – CDDA
Reporting: Environmant Agency Austria
INSPIRE implementation: federal states administration
>> all issues relevant with regard to metadata tagging and „finding“ the relevant data sets at INSPIRE Geoportals

10. Sneak Preview – reduce reporting data sets
Reduction of spatial reference data (type1)
Identification of further relations between reporting processes / obligations („report once, use many times“)
Definition of type 1 and type 2 data – find the appropriate interface
Example: FFH habitat types and species distribution (list no. 24) – type1 & type2 data could be (is not the case now)
Type 1 reference data set: INSPIRE grid
Type 2: data linked to the grid

11. Next Steps Determination of the structure of the priority list
Which data to include ?
Extended list with more details/information needed ? Or overview list sufficient ?
Other proposals for list structure?
Completion of the list after structure determination for all themes
Collect further issues regarding „as is“ data
Decission regarding metadata tagging & testing
Eventually
Identification of possibilities to reduce spatial reference data (type1 data)
Collection of issues regarding INSPIRE data harmonisation / interoperability – priority Annex I, protected sites