Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDavid Hardy Modified over 6 years ago
1
Engaging people : appraising Performance Narayan Gopal malego Uttam Acharya
2
Objectives At the end of the session the participants will be able to:
Analyze the issues and challenges of performance appraisal in civil service Use performance appraisal tools
3
Content Performance management : revisit
Performance appraisal definition Performance appraisal in organization Process Tools and techniques Issues and challenges of performance appraisal
4
HRM component AQUISITION HR Planning Recruitment
Employee socialization MAINTENANCE Safety and Health Employee/Labor Relations DEVELOPMENT Employee Training Management Development Career Development EXTERNAL INFLUENCES Utilization Job Design Performance Evaluation Rewards/Job evaluation Compensation/Benefits Discipline
5
Performance and Appraisal
artistic presentation manner of functioning working effectiveness thing accomplished accomplishment of something display of behavior Appraisal Valuation Evaluation
6
What is performance appraisal?
Discussions
7
Performance Appraisal Defined
It communicates to employees how well they are performing the job and what they can do to improve It has three main purposes: Improve employee performance in the present job Prepare employees for future opportunities in the organization Provide a record of employee performance to be used as a basis for future management decisions
8
What is Performance Appraisal
What is Performance Appraisal? (employee value) “concerned with the process of valuing a person’s worth to an organization with a view to increasing it” Performance appraisal is the process of obtaining, analyzing and recording information about the relative worth of an employee. The focus of the performance appraisal is measuring and improving the actual performance of the employee, and Also the future potential of the employee. Its aim is to measure what an employee does.
9
Performance appraisal-periodic rating
Systematic, Periodic, and Impartial rating of an employee’s excellence: “in the matters pertaining to his/her present job and potential for a better job”. Systematic way of reviewing and assessing the performance of an employee : during a given period of time and planning for his future Employees’ Performance: Time and Plan
10
Use of performance appraisal
Group Discussion
11
Use of Performance Appraisal
Administrative purposes Working conditions Promotions Termination Rewards Developmental purposes Improving Performance Strengthening job skills Providing feedback Counseling Training
12
Performance Appraisal in Organization
To review the performance of the employees over a given period of time. To judge the gap between the actual and the desired performance. To help the management in exercising organizational control. Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates and management – employees. To diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the individuals so as to identify the training and development needs of the future.
13
Performance Appraisal in organization
To provide feedback to the employees regarding their past performance. Provide information to assist in the other decisions in the organization. Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed by the employees. To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions of the organization such as recruitment, selection, training and development. To reduce the grievances of the employees.
14
Primary uses of Performance Appraisal www.performanceappraisal.com
Small Organizations Large Organizations All Organizations Compensation 80.2% 66.7% 74.9% Performance improvement 46.3% 53.3% 48.4% Feedback 40.3% 40.6% 40.4% Documentation 29.0% 32.2% 30.2% Promotion 26.1% 22.8% 24.8% Training 5.1% 9.4% 7.3% Transfer 8.1% 6.1% Discharge 4.9% 6.7% 5.6% Layoff 2.1% 2.8% 2.4% Personnel research 1.8% 2.2% Manpower planning 0.7% 1.5%
15
Process of performance appraisal?
16
Process Of Performance Appraisal
ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS COMMUNICATING THE STANDARDS MEASURING THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE COMPARING THE ACTUAL WITH THE DESIRED PERFORMANCE DISCUSSING RESULTS DECISION MAKING ways to know degrees of an employee’s contribution to the organizational goals and objectives.
17
Tools and techniques
18
Techniques and tools Ranking method Paired Comparison
Confidential Report Essay Evaluation Critical Incident Checklists (listing effective and ineffective behavior) Graphic Rating Scale BARS Forced Choice Method (choose one activity among alternatives) MBO (how well accomplish the org objectives) Field Review Technique Performance Test
19
Measurement Tools – Trait Appraisal Instruments/ graphic rating scale
Focuses on the person rather than on the performance Employee is rated on factors such as initiative, dependability, cooperativeness, quality of work etc. Supervisors tend to evaluate everyone Method provides same information on all employees ( inexpensive to develop)
20
Graphic Rating Scale- example
How courteous is this front desk representative towards the customers? Very Discourteous Neither Courteous Courteous Very Discourteous nor Discourteous Courteous
21
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ignores customer who needs help Keeps customer waiting unnecessarily Fails to thank customer for purchases Answers customers questions promptly Completes transactions in a timely manner Greets customers pleasantly and offers assistance Always tries to sincerely help customers locate items to suit their needs
22
Practices in civil service
Discussion and sharing
23
Who appraises performance?
Group Discussion
24
Who Appraises Performance?
Supervisors Self-appraisals Peer appraisals Subordinate appraisals Customer/client appraisals Multiple raters 360-degree appraisal
25
Issues and challenges
26
Issues and challenges Lack of objectivity Stereotype
Halo error (Rate employees the same on every trait) Stereotype Leniency/strictness Central tendency Recency effect (Focus on recent behavior and impression) Similarity (similar values and interest to the reviewer) Personal bias Manipulating the evaluation
27
Conflict between merit base versus seniority
Which one is better? Can be ignored seniority base? Can be merit should get low weightage?
28
Tips for Better Performance Reviews
Start with the raw data Make sure you are evaluating performance on appropriate dimensions Beware of rating biases Support ratings with written comments Evaluate several or all of your people at one time, if possible Stick with performance and stay away from inferences about cause Be consistent across employees
29
Thank you for your Attentive Participation
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.