1. Faculty Affairs & Development
California state university, Dominguez hills
August 6th, 2018

2. The “score card” for faculty hiring
31 new AY TT/T faculty started in “Academic Colleges”
1 new TT librarian; 6 (!) new TT Psych Couns.
2 new TT “12-month” faculty & 1 Spring start AY
3 “Full-time Lecturers” hired
8 “failed searches”
2 searches still listed as “open”

3. Guiding principles
Accreditation requirements are in fact requirements and while a program’s accreditation is supported need to be met.
Tenure density and any other quantitative variable should be using a common definition between colleges.
Programmatic needs that call for variances between colleges/departments should be explained.
Requests from colleges should reflect forward planning.
Fundamental needs shouldn’t be a moving target.

4. Allocation of new lines
SP18: Deans discuss proposals with chairs
FA&D supplies comparison data on tenure density to deans
April, 2018: Deans compile proposals for colleges and submit to central AA
May 4th, 2018: Deans discuss and “make their cases”
Summer, 2018: [leadership change] proposed set of new lines discussed in cabinet and budget scrutinized.

5. [process, continued]
Summer, 2018: [leadership change] proposed set of new lines discussed in cabinet and budget scrutinized.
President gives final decision on # new lines.
August/Sept, 2018: FA&D reviews replacement/rollover data
[today] Present to Senate

6. Thanks!