Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Complex Beacon Pros and Cons

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Complex Beacon Pros and Cons"— Presentation transcript:

1 Complex Beacon Pros and Cons
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2007 Complex Beacon Pros and Cons IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Carl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at > David Mazzarese, Samsung John Doe, Some Company

2 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2007 Abstract Summary of pros and cons presented in _Samsung_Beacon_Simulations.ppt Complete proposal on dual channel beacon with DQPSK complex spreading, supported by simulations in AWGN, Rayleigh fading, multipath channel with profile A, and beacon-to-beacon interference. David Mazzarese, Samsung John Doe, Some Company

3 January 2007 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.22-yy/xxxxr0
Complex modulation with parallel sync burst and payload TG1 Draft Frame structure Transmit the sync burst and the payload in parallel (future proof) Transmit the sync burst and the payload in sequence Modulation DQPSK with complex spreading DBPSK with real spreading Other PHY parameters Same sync burst and PSDU bitmap, chip rate and spreading factor Same sync burst and PSDU durations (same short and long quiet periods) Complexity Beacon: DQPSK encoder WRAN: DQPSK decoder Beacon: DBPSK encoder WRAN: DBPSK decoder Sync burst detection rate Sync burst can be detected at any time No sync burst when sending PSDU PER vs. Es/No 4.5 dB loss vs. DBPSK at 1% PER … down to ~ 1.5 dB when considering increased detection rate (sync burst) Range is not as crucial as detection time* Reference Es/No = 22 dB (sync burst) Range Range loss relative to ~ 1.5 dB propagation loss Reference distance = ? Transmission rate PSDU is sent every 40 ms faster detection by WRAN faster beacon aggregation (on-channel) PSDU is sent less frequently currently 1 per second -constraint for WRAN scheduling Reliability FEC can be added independently. 4 bits free in sync burst. FEC can be added independently (*) Why detection time is more crucial than range: 2 sec detection time is required in all cases. Having only one CPE at the edge of the keep-out region is a rare event (CPE receiver diversity is assumed in most cases, with CPEs close to the wireless microphone or well within the keep-out region) David Mazzarese, Samsung John Doe, Some Company

4 Backup slides (from 22-06-0234-04-0001_Samsung_Beacon_Simulations.ppt)
January 2007 Backup slides (from _Samsung_Beacon_Simulations.ppt) David Mazzarese, Samsung

5 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2007 Transmitter with complex spreading and dual channel, using DQPSK modulation + PSDU Data Pilot: sync & count-down Q I Complex spreading Beacon Signal Z-1 David Mazzarese, Samsung John Doe, Some Company

6 Frame structure: dual channel with sync-N burst and complex DSSS
January 2007 Frame structure: dual channel with sync-N burst and complex DSSS sync N N-1 PSDU I Q Rx period ANP One Packet, constant length 49 bytes with proposed revision (doc Nov 2006) David Mazzarese, Samsung

7 Receiver structure with DQPSK
January 2007 Receiver structure with DQPSK David Mazzarese, Samsung

8 January 2007 1.5 dB David Mazzarese, Samsung


Download ppt "Complex Beacon Pros and Cons"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google