Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Capacity Regions for Wireless AdHoc Networks
The presentation is based on a paper: S. Toumpis and A. J. Goldsmith: Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , IEEE Transactions Wireless Communications , Vol. 2 No. 4, pp , July 2003 Presented by Antti Tölli
2
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Outline Introduction System Model Transmission Schemes and Schedules Rate Matrices Capacity regions Results for Specific Configurations Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
3
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Intro Lower and upper bounds of capacity of AdHoc NWs defined for large number of nodes (Gupta&Kumar*, Grossglauser&Tse**) Capacity regions for AdHoc NWs with any number of nodes defined in this article Although, max achievable rates defined for specific tx protocols (maybe suboptimal) Impact of power control, multihop routing, spatial reuse, successive interference cancellation, etc. studied Special Challenges of Ad Hoc Networks No infrastructure Decentralized control (power, routing, data rates, etc) Dynamic topology Wireless channel impairments *P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, “The capacity of wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 46, pp. 388–404, Mar **M. Grossglauser and D. N. C. Tse, “Mobility Increases the Capacity of Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 10, no. 4, August 2002, pp Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
4
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
System Model, #1 nodes : A1 … An Each Ai has transceiver with infinite buffer maximal power output is Pi canNOT simultaneously send and receive may send data to any Aj (multihop routing possible) occupy ALL bandwidth (W) while transmitting NO broadcast Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
5
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
System Model, #2 Channel Gains: G = {Gij}, f(distance, shadowing) Noise: AWGN, H = [h1 ... hn] Each node knows “everything”: G, H, P t J At is transmitting with power Pt If Ai (i J) transmits to Aj (j J), SINR: data rate: Rij = f(gij) pre-agreed for performance; e.g., f(gij) =W log2(1+gij) Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
6
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Transmission Schemes T-scheme S : Complete description of information flow betweeen different nodes in the network at a given time instant all transmit-receive node pairs, and data rates originating node of data Example: S1 S2 Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
7
Time Division Scheduling
Network may alternate various schemes Example T1 = 0.5S1+0.5S2 or T2 = 0.75S1+0.25S2 Resulting info flow: S1 S2 T1 T2 Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
8
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Rate Matrices, #1 For given scheme S, R(S) is n×n matrix such that Rij= ±r Aj receives/send r bps originating at Ai S1 S2 Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
9
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Rate Matrices, #2 Time-division scheduling: T1 T2 Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
10
Transmission Protocols & Basic Rate Matrices
Transmission protocol: collection of rules that node must satisfy when transmitting Transmit own info only, Transmit with max power, Can transmit simultaneously with other nodes, Interference treatment: noise (SIC not allowed) or SIC Given a protocol, many Tx schemes are possible Basic rate matrix: each Tx scheme has a rate matrix The less restrictive Tx protocol, the larger the collection of rate matrices and vice versa Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
11
Capacity Region: Definition
Capacity region: Convex Hull of all basic rate matrices such that the weighted sums have NO negative off-diagonal elements Describes the net flow of the info in the NW Uniform Capacity, Cu= Rmax × n(n−1) with Rmax largest R given the matrix is in the capacity region: Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
12
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Network Parameters Nodes: 5 uniformly distributed in box [-10m , 10m]×[-10m , 10m] Gij = K·Sij ·(d0/dij)a, K=10-6, d0 =10m, a=4 Sij (shadowing) lognormal with µ= 0dB and s= 8 db Pj = 0.1W ; hj = W/Hz Bandwidth: W = 106 Hz rij=f(gij) =W log2(1+gij) Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
13
Capacity: Single-Hop Routing, No Spatial Reuse
Only one transmits at a time: # of schemes is Na = n(n−1)+1 Associated rate matrices : (Ra)i , i = 1 … Na uniform capacity : 0.83 Mbps Slice of capacity region (see a) in p. 16) Only nodes A1 and A3 send data Straight line – no spatial reuse, transmission only between one source-destination point at any time Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
14
Capacity: Multi-Hop Routing, No Spatial Reuse
Only one transmits at a time N nodes in the system, each has n-1 different possible receivers and n possible nodes to forward data # of schemes is Nb = n2(n−1)n+1 Uniform capacity : 2.85 Mbps (242% increase) Slice of capacity region (see b in figure, p. 16) Straight line again – no spatial reuse, transmission only between one source-destination point at any time Significant capacity increase: multiple hops over favourable channels instead of transmitting directly over paths with small gains Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
15
Capacity: Multi-Hop Routing, with Spatial Reuse
Multiple active connections allowed at any time # of schemes is Uniform capacity : 3.58 Mbps (26% increase) Slice of capacity region (see c in figure, p. 16) No longer a straight line, NW can use spatial reuse to maintain multiple active transmissions (directly or over multihop) Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
16
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Capacity Figures (a) Single-hop, No spatial reuse (b) Multihop, no spatial reuse (c) Multihop, spatial reuse (d) 2-level power cntrl added to (c) (e) Succs. interference cancellation Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
17
Fading and Mobility Increase Capacity
Time varying flat fading channel Capacity increases as the # of fading states increases a) % b) one fading state c) 2 fading states d) 10 fading states e) 15 fading states M different fading states Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
18
Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, CWC @ Univ. of Oulu
Conclusions Mathematical framework developed for finding capacity regions for AdHoc/multihop NWs under time-division routing and given transmission protocol Network performance shown to be improved by: Multihop routing, spatial reuse and interference cancellation Fading and node mobility Capacity Regions for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Univ. of Oulu
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.