1. For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”
Oct. 7, 2014
Academic Senate Presentation
Kim Hoffmans & Lee Ballestero

2. Process for EdCAP GAP Analysis
Fall 2013-
Review of Accreditation Standards
Volunteers for Standards Workgroups
Fall 2013 & Spring 2014
Workgroups answer ACCJC Standard Prompts, gather evidence, and identify gaps
Report out on findings
Fall 2014
Validate gaps

3. Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness and Integrity
Mission Statement should include:
Identified Cycle of Review
Review from external constituents

4. Standard 1: Continued…
Integrated Planning to ensure Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness should cover:
Academic Quality and Effectiveness- documentation (Ya’ll Come, Fall Fling, etc…)campus-wide dialog assessing, analyzing and evaluating mission accomplishments through program review (qualitative and quantitative data)
Institutional Integrity- assuring accuracy and integrity of information

5. STANDARD II: Student Learning Programs and Support Services
Instructional programs need to include:
Consistent evaluation of Institutional level, GE Level, and Program Level Outcomes
Examination of the effectiveness of GE outcomes learned in subsequent coursework/employment.
Support of achievement outcomes for distance education (DE)
Examination of the extent students’ progress to complete degrees and certificates through DE only or through a mix of DE and face-to-face delivery?
Evaluation of programs/courses to improve learning outcomes and student achievements

6. STANDARD II: Student Learning Programs and Support Services
Library and Learning Support Services need to include:
Evaluation of support for DE, evening, and weekend student leaning and achievement
Evidence of how programs that are created or changes that are made affect student success(SB 1456)
Evaluate services to to assure adequacy of meeting institutional needs and support mission

7. Standard III: Resources
The standard should include:
A connection between personnel evaluations and institutional effectiveness and improvement.
Evidence (qualitative and quantitative) of use of SLOs in all aspects of decision-making
A central committee to plan, implement and evaluate the needs/effectiveness of DE program resources (equipment, IT support, and facilities)
Feedback (better communication) between program requests for support with achievement / increased success within the program plan and SLO reporting.

8. Timeline…. Fall 2014 EdCAP finish Gap Analysis
Standard’s Workgroups expand membership and continue completing outline and gathering evidence
Spring 2015
EdCAP forward completed outlines and evidence to EVP/ALO
Spring 2015-Fall 2015
Designated writer uses EdCAP Workgroup evidence and supporting documentation to write self-study
EdCAP will work with Designated writer to help review drafts
Campus-wide distribution and discussion of self-study

9. Timeline continues…. January 2016-First Draft to Board
July Final Draft to the Board
August Self-Study to ACCCJC
October ACCCJC Site Visit
Rinse and repeat….

10. Volunteer for a Standard Workgroup
Where we go from here…
Volunteer for a Standard Workgroup