Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Cut to Length Logging (CTL)
Fuel loading v. efficiency
2
Processing Heads
3
Forwarder
4
Why do we use CTL Gain efficiency in small diameter stands
Allows more options when matching whole tree systems with CTL systems Decreases soil compaction Processors walk on created slash while cutting Forwarders walk on created processor slash when “skidding” Smaller landing size Benefits from nutrient cycling
5
Sugar TS – fir unit More fuel left in the unit 7-12 tons/acre?
Is Piling needed Prescribed fire? Cost effectiveness
6
Sugar TS – pine unit (220)
7
Smaller Landing Size
8
Sugar TS – LP and white fir (226)
9
Sugar unit 226
10
What’s the issue? Still seeing “whole tree required” in planning documents Would like to retain the option to log using either system based on efficiency and need Discuss what is acceptable fuel load retention Do we need to pile? Can we use service work $$ for other acres and used prescribed fire to treat after logging? Questions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.