1. MAC Calibration Results
November 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0
October 2014
MAC Calibration Results
Date: 9/10/2014
Authors:
Name
Affiliations
Address
Phone
Igor Kim
ETRI
Korea
Gwangzeen Ko
Hyunduk Kang
Myung-Sun Song
Igor Kim, ETRI

2. October 2014
Summary
In [1], [2] simulation scenarios and evaluation methods for MAC simulator are described
Some MAC calibrations are described in [3] – [8]
In [9] comparison of each company’s MAC calibration for scenarios 1 – 3 is done
This document provides results of MAC simulator for
MAC overhead (test 1a (w/o RTS) and 1b (w/ RTS))
Deferral tests (tests 2a (w/o hidden node) and 2b (w/ hidden node))
NAV deferral (test 3)
Compare MAC simulator results by company
Igor Kim, ETRI

3. Test 1a. MAC Overhead w/o RTS/CTS
October 2014
Test 1a. MAC Overhead w/o RTS/CTS
STA 1
AP1
Simulation Parameters
Guard interval: long
Data preamble: 11ac
Bandwidth: 20 MHz
A-MPDU aggregation: 2 MPDU per A-MPDU
Max retries: 10
Fixed MCS: MCS0 (6.5 Mbit/s) and MCS8 (78 Mbit/s)
RTS/CTS: off
Cwmin: 15
AIFSN [BE]: 2
PER: 0
MSDU length: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 bytes
Application data size: 464, 964, 1464, 1964 bytes
L4 – L3 header overhead: 36 bytes
SIFS: 16us, DIFS = AIFS [BE] = 34us
Igor Kim, ETRI

4. Defer & backoff duration
October 2014
Test 1a. Check Points
MSDU size = 1500 bytes, MCS0
Test Items
Check points
Standard definition
Matching?
A-MPDU duration
Tcp2 - Tcp1 = 3824 us
ceil((FrameLength*8)/rate/OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header
 YES
SIFS
Tcp3 - Tcp2 = 16 us
16 us
ACK duration
Tcp4 - Tcp3 = 68 us
ceil((ACKFrameLength*8)/rate/OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header
Defer & backoff duration
Tcp5 - Tcp4 = us
DIFS(34 us)+backoff (CWmin)
=34us+n*9/2us
Igor Kim, ETRI

5. Test 1a. Simulation Time Trace
October 2014
Test 1a. Simulation Time Trace
CP1 start of A-MPDU, [sec]
CP2 end of A-MPDU, [sec]
CP2-CP1, [us]
Expected A-MPDU duration, [us]
3824
Difference, [us] – signal propagation delay
CP3 start of BA, [sec]
CP3-CP2, [us] 16
Expected SIFS duration, [us]
CP4 end of BA, [sec]
CP4-CP3, [us]
Expected ACK duration, [us] 68
CP5 start of new A-MPDU, [sec]
CP5-CP4, [us] 43
Expected DIFS + backoff duration, [us]
[34, 169]
Igor Kim, ETRI

6. Test 1a. Throughput Results
October 2014
Test 1a. Throughput Results
MCS index
Application data size, [Bytes]
MSDU size, [Bytes]
Numerical L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Numerical MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
464
500
964
1000
1464
1500
1964
2000 8
Igor Kim, ETRI

7. Test 1b. MAC Overhead with RTS/CTS
October 2014
Test 1b. MAC Overhead with RTS/CTS
STA 1
AP1
Simulation Parameters
Guard interval: long
Data preamble: 11ac
Bandwidth: 20 MHz
A-MPDU aggregation: 2 MPDU per A-MPDU
Max retries: 10
Fixed MCS: MCS0 (6.5 Mbit/s) and MCS8 (78 Mbit/s)
RTS/CTS: on
Cwmin: 15
AIFSN [BE]: 2
PER: 0
MSDU length: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 bytes
Application data size: 464, 964, 1464, 1964 bytes
L4 – L3 header overhead: 36 bytes
SIFS: 16us, DIFS = AIFS [BE] = 34us
Igor Kim, ETRI

8. Test 1b. Check Points October 2014 MSDU size = 1500 bytes, MCS0
Test Items
Check points
Standard definition
Matching?
RTS duration
Tcp2 - Tcp1 = 52 us
ceil((RTSFrameLength*8)/rate/OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header
YES 
CTS duration
Tcp4 - Tcp3 = 44 us
ceil((CTSFrameLength*8)/rate/OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header
 YES
Frame duration
Tcp6 - Tcp5 = 3824 us
ceil((FrameLength*8)/rate/OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header
Igor Kim, ETRI

9. Test 1b. Simulation Time Trace
October 2014
Test 1b. Simulation Time Trace
CP1 start of RTS, [sec]
CP2 end of RTS, [sec]
CP2-CP1, [us]
Expected RTS duration, [us]
52.0
Difference, [us] – signal propagation delay
CP3 start of CTS, [sec]
CP3-CP2, [us] 16
Expected SIFS duration, [us]
CP4 end of CTS, [sec]
CP4-CP3, [us]
Expected CTS duration, [us]
44.0
CP5 start of A-MPDU, [sec]
CP5-CP4, [us]
CP6 end of A-MPDU, [sec]
CP6-CP5, [us]
Expected A-MPDU duration, [us]
3824
Igor Kim, ETRI

10. Test 1b. Throughput Results
October 2014
Test 1b. Throughput Results
MCS index
Application data size, [Bytes]
MSDU size, [Bytes]
Numerical L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Numerical MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
464
500
964
1000
1464
1500
1964
2000 8
Igor Kim, ETRI

11. Test 2a. Deferral Test1 October 2014 November 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0
October 2014
Test 2a. Deferral Test1
STA 1
AP 2
AP1
STA 2
(AP1 and STA2 are essentially co-located)
Guard interval: long
Data preamble: 11ac
Bandwidth: 20 MHz
A-MPDU aggregation: 2 MPDU per A-MPDU
Max retries: 10
Fixed MCS: MCS0 (6.5 Mbit/s)
RTS/CTS: [OFF, ON]
Cwmin: 15
AIFSN [BE]: 2
PER: 0
MSDU length: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 bytes
Application data size: 464, 964, 1464, 1964 bytes
L4 – L3 header overhead: 36 bytes
SIFS: 16us, DIFS = AIFS [BE] = 34us
Igor Kim, ETRI

12. Test 2a. Throughput and PER Results
October 2014
Test 2a. Throughput and PER Results
RTS/CTS
Application data size, [Bytes]
MSDU size, [Bytes]
PER
Simulated L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s] No
464
500
964
1000
1464
1500
1964
2000
Yes
0.0
Igor Kim, ETRI

13. Test 2b. Deferral Test2 October 2014 November 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0
October 2014
Test 2b. Deferral Test2
STA 1
AP 2
AP1
STA 2
Guard interval: long
Data preamble: 11ac
Bandwidth: 20 MHz
A-MPDU aggregation: 2 MPDU per A-MPDU, OFF
Max retries: 10
Fixed MCS: MCS0 (6.5 Mbit/s) and MCS8 (78 Mbit/s)
RTS/CTS: [OFF]
Cwmin: 15
AIFSN [BE]: 2
PER: 0
MSDU length: 1500 bytes
Application data size: 1464 bytes
L4 – L3 header overhead: 36 bytes
SIFS: 16us, DIFS = AIFS [BE] = 34us
Igor Kim, ETRI

14. Test 2b. Throughput and PER Results
October 2014
Test 2b. Throughput and PER Results
FA – frame aggregation FA
MCS index
Application data size, [Bytes]
MSDU size, [Bytes]
PER
Simulated L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Yes
1464
1500 8 No
Igor Kim, ETRI

15. Test 3. NAV Deferral October 2014 November 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0
October 2014
Test 3. NAV Deferral
STA 1
AP 2
AP1
STA 2
Guard interval: long
Data preamble: 11ac
Bandwidth: 20 MHz
A-MPDU aggregation: 2 MPDU per A-MPDU, OFF
Max retries: 10
Fixed MCS: MCS0 (6.5 Mbit/s) and MCS8 (78 Mbit/s)
RTS/CTS: [ON]
Cwmin: 15
AIFSN [BE]: 2
PER: 0
MSDU length: 1500 bytes
Application data size: 1464 bytes
L4 – L3 header overhead: 36 bytes
SIFS: 16us, DIFS = AIFS [BE] = 34us
Igor Kim, ETRI

16. Test 3. Throughput and PER Results
October 2014
Test 3. Throughput and PER Results
FA – frame aggregation FA
MCS index
Application data size, [Bytes]
MSDU size, [Bytes]
PER
Simulated L4 Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Simulated MAC Throughput, [Mbit/s]
Yes
1464
1500
0.0 8 No
Igor Kim, ETRI

17. Test 1a. Results Comparison
October 2014
Test 1a. Results Comparison
Configurations
MCS0 (6.5Mbps)
MCS8 (78Mbps)
500
1000
1500
2000
ETRI
Huawei
4.79
5.55
5.84
6.00
21.98
34.91
43.24
48.67
LGE
4.81
5.99
22.4
35.2
43.25
48.9
Qualcomm
4.76
5.53
5.82
5.98
23.92
37.25
45.55
50.81
MediaTek
21.71
34.65
42.71
48.15
Intel
21.53
34.46
42.58
48.14
Ericsson
4.75
5.52
5.97
34.47
42.57
48.09
Nokia
5.83
21.19
34.22
41.93
47.74
NTT
5.54
22.00
35.00
43.20
48.40
MCS0
MCS8
Igor Kim, ETRI

18. Test 1b. Results Comparison
October 2014
Test 1b. Results Comparison
Configurations
MCS0 (6.5Mbps)
MCS8 (78Mbps)
500
1000
1500
2000
ETRI
Huawei
4.42
5.31
5.66
5.85
15.94
27.07
34.97
40.61
LGE
4.45
5.86
16.2
27.3 35
40.8
Qualcomm
4.4
5.29
5.64
5.84
18.64
30.75
38.94
44.51
MediaTek
4.40
15.79
26.90
34.62
40.24
Intel
15.7
26.8
34.55
40.26
Nokia
5.28
5.83
15.52
26.66
34.12
39.96
NTT
5.30
5.67
16.00
27.10
40.40
MCS0
MCS8
Igor Kim, ETRI

19. Test 2a. Results Comparison
October 2014
Test 2a. Results Comparison
Configurations
Without RTS/CTS
With RTS/CTS
500
1000
1500
2000
ETRI
Huawei
4.56
5.25
5.51
5.66
4.46
5.33
5.68
5.87
LGE
4.62
5.28
5.54
4.5
5.34
5.88
Qualcomm
4.57
5.26
5.53
5.67
4.45
5.32
5.86
MediaTek
4.71
5.48
5.78
5.94
4.35
5.24
5.62
5.81
Intel
4.52
5.22
4.44
5.31
Ericsson
4.53
5.21
5.63
Nokia
4.58
5.29
5.56
5.71
4.48
5.85
NTT
5.45
4.49
5.35
5.70
w/o RTS/CTS
w/ RTS/CTS
Igor Kim, ETRI

20. Test 2b. Results Comparison
October 2014
Test 2b. Results Comparison
Scenarios
ETRI
Huawei
LGE
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
No FA, MCS0
1.62
1.7
FA, MCS0
1.01
1.02
0.98
1.008
1.20
1.06
No FA, MCS8
28.845
26.54
26.8
FA, MCS8
34.75
35.0　
35.66
Igor Kim, ETRI

21. Test 3. Results Comparison
October 2014
Test 3. Results Comparison
Scenarios
ETRI
Huawei
LGE
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
No FA, MCS0
5.15
5.14
FA, MCS0
5.58
5.58　
5.55
5.66
5.59
5.40
No FA, MCS8
22.04
22.4
FA, MCS8
34.05
34.2　
31.35
Igor Kim, ETRI

22. Clarification Issues (1)
October 2014
Clarification Issues (1)
Defer & Backoff duration formula in Test 1a
Correct formula and value
DIFS(34 us)+backoff (CWmin)/2=34us+n*9/2us = 101.5us
n = 15
Signal propagation delay
Signal propagation delay Tprop = d/c
d – distance between transmitter and receiver
c – speed of light in vacuum (3*108 m/s)
A distance of 100m adds us propagation delay
Do we need to consider it?
Igor Kim, ETRI

23. Clarification Issues (2)
October 2014
Clarification Issues (2)
A-MPDU Tx time estimation
According to the standard: “Except when an A-MPDU subframe is the last one in an A-MPDU, padding octets are appended to make each A-MPDU subframe a multiple of 4 octets in length”
A-MPDU size = (MSDU + MAC header + delimiter)*2*8 + padding + service + tail = ( )*2* = bits
A-MPDU duration = ceil((FrameLength*8) /rate /OFDMsymbolduration) * OFDMsymbolduration + PHY Header = ceil(24582/6.5/4) * = 3824 us
Igor Kim, ETRI

24. Conclusion MAC calibration results
October 2014
Conclusion
MAC calibration results
Performed simulations for Tests 1 – 3
Simulation results show similar trend with other companies results
Igor Kim, ETRI

25. Reference [1] 11-14-0980-04-00ax-simulation-scenarios
October 2014
Reference
[1] ax-simulation-scenarios
[2] ax-evaluation-methodology
[3] ax-mac-calibration-results
[4] ax-mac-simulator-calibration
[5] ax-mac-calibration-result
[6] ax-mac-calibration-results-for-test-1-and-2
[7] ax-mac-calibration-huawei-results
[8] ax-mac-simulator-calibration-results
[9] ax-comparing-mac-calibration-results
Igor Kim, ETRI