Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Chapter 19 Opener Interspecies interactions
Evolution-2e-Chapter-19-Opener.jpg
2
Figure 19.1 Three kinds of coevolution
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
3
Figure The phylogeny of endosymbiotic bacteria included under the name Buchnera aphidicola is perfectly congruent with that of their aphid hosts Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
4
Figure (A) A phylogeny of specialized feather lice is mostly congruent with that of their hosts. (B) Lice transferred from rock pigeons to other individuals increased when the birds couldn’t preen Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
5
Figure 19.3 (A) A phylogeny of specialized feather lice is mostly congruent with that of their hosts
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
6
Figure (B) Lice transferred from rock pigeons to other individuals increased when the birds couldn’t preen Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
7
Figure By and large, closely related species of Blepharida leaf beetles feed on chemically similar plants Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
8
Figure By and large, closely related species of Blepharida leaf beetles feed on chemically similar plants (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
9
Figure By and large, closely related species of Blepharida leaf beetles feed on chemically similar plants (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
10
Figure Predators and parasites have evolved many extraordinary adaptations to capture prey or infect hosts Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
11
Figure A computer simulation of genetic changes at (A) a resistance locus in a host and (B) an infectivity locus in a parasite Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
12
Figure Computer simulation of coevolution between prey and predator in which the optimal predator phenotype (e.g., mouth size) matches a prey phenotype (e.g., size) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
13
Figure Computer simulation of coevolution between prey and predator in which the optimal predator phenotype (e.g., mouth size) matches a prey phenotype (e.g., size) (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
14
Figure Computer simulation of coevolution between prey and predator in which the optimal predator phenotype (e.g., mouth size) matches a prey phenotype (e.g., size) (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
15
Figure Variation in TTX resistance, measured by crawling speed after injection in relation to dose, in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) from several localities Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
16
Figure Variation in TTX resistance, measured by crawling speed after injection in relation to dose, in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) from several localities Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
17
Figure Evidence of adaptation of the Australian red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) to incursion of the South American cane toad (Bufo marinus) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
18
Figure Evidence of adaptation of the Australian red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) to incursion of the South American cane toad (Bufo marinus) Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
19
Figure (A) A fledgling common cuckoo being fed by its foster parent, a much smaller reed warbler. (B) Mimetic egg polymorphism in the European cuckoo Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
20
Figure The furanocoumarins bergapten and sphondin are among the defensive compounds of wild parsnip, the host plant of a moth larva, the parsnip webworm Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
21
Figure 19.12 Evidence of selection for defensive traits in the common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
22
Figure Evidence of selection for defensive traits in the common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
23
Figure Evidence of selection for defensive traits in the common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
24
Figure 19.13 Imbalance in a coevolutionary conflict
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
25
Figure 19.13 Imbalance in a coevolutionary conflict (Part 1)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
26
Figure 19.13 Imbalance in a coevolutionary conflict (Part 2)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
27
Figure The fitnesses of three strains of a microsporidian parasite and their effects on various populations of the host species, the water flea Daphnia magna Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
28
Figure (A) In an experiment, bacteria were most successful in infecting “contemporary” Daphnia. (B) Bacteria virulence increased over time Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
29
Figure 19.16 Mutualisms may result in extreme adaptations
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
30
Figure 19.17 Yucca moths and their evolutionary history
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
31
Figure 19.17 Yucca moths and their evolutionary history (Part 1)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
32
Figure 19.17 Yucca moths and their evolutionary history (Part 2)
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
33
Figure 19.18 The members of an extraordinary mutualism
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
34
Figure 19.19 A model of evolutionary divergence in response to competition
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
35
Figure Character displacement in bill size in seed-eating ground finches of the Galápagos Islands Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
36
Figure Character displacement in bill size in seed-eating ground finches of the Galápagos Islands (Part 1) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
37
Figure Character displacement in bill size in seed-eating ground finches of the Galápagos Islands (Part 2) Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
38
Figure A history of change in mean beak size in the ground finch Geospiza fortis on the island of Daphne Major Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
39
Figure A history of change in mean beak size in the ground finch Geospiza fortis on the island of Daphne Major Evolution-2e-Fig R.jpg
40
Figure 19.22 Ecological release
Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
41
Figure Speciation rates may be higher on islands than on the mainland, a pattern expected if island forms are free of competition with the more diverse mainland biota Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
42
Figure A nonrandom pattern of “equal spacing” among related predators may have evolved to minimize competition for food Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
43
Figure A mimicry ring Evolution-2e-Fig jpg
44
Evolution-2e-Table jpg
Similar presentations
