1. ANTICORRP WP 7 TI Activities Update
Anticorrp 2nd Consortium Meeting, Berlin, October 2014

2. Work package 7:
Individual values and motivations to engage against corruption
Main question:
>>What factors influence citizens to act against corruption individually and collectively?<<

3. TI-S research
Social accountability research stocktake: what does existing research say
Citizen survey in Europe:
30 country survey to be carried out by EBRD as part of LiTS 3
Focus on bribery experience, perceptions of corruption in key institutions, government performance in addressing corruption and attitudes/behaviour towards reporting corruption
Boundary research: insights on political mobilisation from other disciplines
Helpline data analysis
+ merge all research into expected Deliverables

4. TI National chapter research activities
Focus group discussions – individual strategies of resistance
Romania, Macedonia, BiH
In-depth case studies – social accountability in action
UK, Portugal
Action experiments – impact of social accountability tools
Lithuania, Montenegro

5. Bosnia, Romania and Macedonia Lithuania and Montenegro
WP7 activity timeline
Activity
Who is responsible?
2014
2015
2016
Boundary research
TI-S
Citizen survey
Helpline data analysis
Focus group discussions
Bosnia, Romania and Macedonia
Stock-taking
In-depth assessment
Portugal and UK
Action research
Lithuania and Montenegro
March
February
January
June
January
November
March
February
January
December
December
September
February
December

6. Academic article August 2016
WP7 Deliverables
Citizen Action March 2016
Policy brief
Research report
Civil society/ Collective action June 2016
Stocktaking synthesis report
Repository of case studies
Academic article August 2016

7. Early results
Working paper on crowdsourcing corruption
Mini survey, case study synthesis, broad literature scan and online observation
3 major conventional challenges, 2 overlooked ones, 2 promising counter-strategies and 4 possible bold futures
Some interesting stats:
60% 12, % 11% 7%
>> SSRN
60: share of people who report that they would be willing to report corruption
12,000: ushahidi crowdreporting platforms online
90% have less than 10 reports
11%: people who indicate they would be willing to report to independent organisation (rather than official hotline
7%: share of tech costs in much higher total price tag for running platform (content, editing, promotion)

8. Project lead – Dieter Zinnbauer, dzinnbauer@transparency.org
Key contacts
Project coordination – Santhosh Srinivasan,
Project lead – Dieter Zinnbauer,
Project support – Marie Terracol,

9. www.transparency.org facebook.com/transparencyinternational
twitter.com/anticorruption
blog.transparency.org
© 2014 Transparency International. All rights reserved.