Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHartono Santoso Modified over 6 years ago
1
MR2RP: The Multi-Rate and Multi-Range Routing Protocol for IEEE 802
MR2RP: The Multi-Rate and Multi-Range Routing Protocol for IEEE Ad Hoc Wireless Networks SHIANN-TSONG SHEU Department of Electrical Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC YIHJIA TSAI and JENHUI CHEN Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC Wireless Networks 9, 165–177, 2003 Presented by Yeong-cheng Tzeng
2
Outline Introduction The IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol
The multi-rate and multi-range routing in multi-hop ad hoc WLANs Simulation model and results Conclusion
3
1. Introduction Wireless services become ever more ubiquitous
An increasing demand for the provision of the multimedia services Contention-based MAC protocol cannot guarantee transfer delay for multimedia services In multi-hop ad hoc networks how to find a reliable route with delay constrain PCF is not designed for the distributed environment In multi-rate/multi-range wireless ad hoc network The maximal data rate is adopted to the transmission distance The shortest path of minimal hops may not be the fast route Propose MR2RP to maximize channel utilization as well as the transfer delay
4
2. The IEEE MAC protocol The DCF defined an optionally four-way handshaking scheme (RTS/CTS) To overcome the hidden terminal problem To provide virtual carrier sense (NAV) for saving battery power
5
3. The multi-rate and multi-range routing in multi-hop ad hoc WLANs
3.2. The multi-rate and multi-range transmission model 3.3. The multi-rate and multi-range routing protocol (MR2RP) 3.4. The MAC delay estimation 3.5. The buffer queuing delay estimation 3.6. The routing protocol
6
3.1. Multi-hop ad hoc WLANs How to find an efficient and reliable route? Shortest-path routing – distributed Bellman-Ford Measurement of distance Number of hops Delay time
7
3.2. The multi-rate and multi-range transmission model
Tradeoff between utilization and speed A longer hopping will shorten the transmission distance Sacrifice the transmission speed Choose the path of the maximal transmission rate to minimize the transfer delay Increase the contention delay and buffer delay Degrade the throughput
8
3.3. The multi-rate and multi-range routing protocol (MR2RP)
Problems must be solved Collect all network information on time DSR – flooding with route-discovery packets AODV – hybrid on-demand and table-driven routing Predict the precise MAC delay of a MH Estimates the precise transmission cost
9
3.3. The multi-rate and multi-range routing protocol (MR2RP)
Connectivity matrix where
10
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
11
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Poisson distribution
12
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Arrival state
13
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Backoff state
14
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Expected backoff defer
15
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
NAV state Expected NAV defer
16
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Backoff state delay NAV state delay
17
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
18
3.4. The MAC delay estimation
Final result
19
3.5. The buffer queuing delay estimation
Minimal MAC access delay May not be the best path of the minimal end-to-end transfer delay The buffer delay may dominate the transfer delay Need for the buffer information
20
3.6. The routing protocol
21
3.6. The routing protocol MH0, MH3, MH5 MH0,MH6,MH7,MH5
=10.01 MH0,MH6,MH7,MH5 =8.82 MH3 is a bottleneck
22
4. Simulation model and results
Scenario 16 mobile hosts active in a square area of 200m x 200m Model I Hosts are static Model II Hosts are movable Investigate four parameter Average transfer delay Average MAC access delay Call blocking probability Packet loss ratio
23
4. Simulation model and results
24
4. Simulation model and results
25
4. Simulation model and results
26
4. Simulation model and results
27
5. Conclusion Present a new routing protocol MR2RP Simulation results
MAC delay is estimated precisely Find the fast path according to MAC delay, transmission delay and buffer queuing delay Simulation results Reduce the total transfer delay Increase the total amount of serviced packets The packet loss ratio caused by mobility can be also improved
28
The End
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.