Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face/chest study of prophylactic topical dapsone 5% gel versus moisturizer for the prevention of cetuximab-induced.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face/chest study of prophylactic topical dapsone 5% gel versus moisturizer for the prevention of cetuximab-induced."— Presentation transcript:

1 A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face/chest study of prophylactic topical dapsone 5% gel versus moisturizer for the prevention of cetuximab-induced acneiform rash  Viswanath R. Belum, MD, Michael A. Marchetti, MD, Stephen W. Dusza, DrPH, MPH, Andrea Cercek, MD, Nancy E. Kemeny, MD, Mario E. Lacouture, MD  Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology  Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017) DOI: /j.jaad Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Lesion count differences between control-treated and dapsone-treated sides. Presented are the individual participant trajectories for lesion count differences between control-treated and dapsone-treated sides of the face and chest for those participants who completed the day 28 ± 2 evaluation. Values >0 indicate higher lesion counts on the control-treated side than on the dapsone-treated side of the body. Also included is a fitted trajectory to depict the overall trend in the difference in lesion counts for the group as a whole. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology  , DOI: ( /j.jaad ) Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, split-face/chest study of prophylactic topical dapsone 5% gel versus moisturizer for the prevention of cetuximab-induced."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google