Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
MDM-PAB Meeting – Kerala
Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – Kerala
2
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I Review of Implementation of MDMS in Kerala (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to ) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
3
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions? What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served? What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ? How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains? What is the level of lifting? How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level? How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost? How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
4
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions? How much MME was utilized? Under what activities? What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2008 to 2009? How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
5
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served) Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%) Availability of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or – 10%) Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 75% (+ or – 10%) Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed. Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous. State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines. Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
6
Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Meals during 1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
(Primary + Upper Primary) (24% less) No. of Meals (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
7
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Approval Vs Achievement: (Avg. no of children availed MDM during to ) ( 4% Less) No. of children (In lakh) (1% more) (11% less) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
8
Coverage : No. of Children availed MDM (Up. Primary)
Sl. No. District Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for Average No. of children availed MDM during to Difference No. of children % LESS 1 Thrissur 115425 75589 -39836 -35% 2 Ernakulam 103220 72540 -30680 -30% 3 Pathanamthitta 36524 26179 -10345 -28% 4 Kottayam 64613 49587 -15026 -23% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
9
Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Working Days as on 31.12.09)
(21% less) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
10
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance as on Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
11
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance as on Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
12
Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 52% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
13
Foodgrains Availability (Lifting + O.B) – Dist. wise
Total : 14 Dists Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
14
Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Benchmark : 75% 73097 MTs 38180 Lakh MTs 38020 Lakh MTs Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
15
Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
16
Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009)
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark :75% Rs Cr. Rs Cr. Rs Cr. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
17
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to ) (Rs. In lakhs) 7% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
18
Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
(Rs. In lakhs) Rs Lakhs (100%) Rs Lakhs 48% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
19
Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
20
Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
21
Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No. Component Achievement Benchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 52% 85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 75% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 4. MME Utilisation 7% 5. Tran. Asst. Utilisation 48% 6. Kitchen Shed construction 62% 100% 7. Kitchen Devices procurement 76% 8. QPRs received 3nos. 3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
22
Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
23
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2009-10 (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs) Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 (Proposed) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
24
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availed MDM during 2009-10 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs) 11.08 Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 (Proposed) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
25
No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
S. No Year As per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions 1 183 200 2 184 3 4 (State’s claim for ) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
26
Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme
Already Engaged Proposed ( ) Cook-cum-helper 14,291 31,520 (14, ,229) Central assistance was released for payment of honorarium to 12,410 cook-cum-helper in Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
27
Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store
No. of institutions Sanctioned Constructed through convergence Gap 11,490 1,285 6,367 3,838 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
28
Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.