Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΠαρασκευή Γιαννακόπουλος Modified over 6 years ago
1
CEC 2003 Tatsuya Okabe, Yaochu Jin and Bernhard Sendhoff
A Critical Survey of Performance Indices for Multi-Objective Optimization CEC 2003 Tatsuya Okabe, Yaochu Jin and Bernhard Sendhoff
2
Various Performance Indices
Cardinality-based Accuracy Distance-based Volume-based Distribution & spread Distribution Spread
3
Cardinality-based No information about the accuracy and distribution of the solutions. Insensitive to small improvements. Often fail to indicate the relative quality of two solution sets.
4
Accuracy Reference point or true optimal point must be given: impossible for many real-world apps. Influenced by the spread and distribution of solutions.
5
Empirical Comparison Artificial solution sets
6
Comparison Results Cardinality-based Accuracy: distance Accuracy: volume Distribution Spread Distribution & Spread Cardinality based PI cannot distinguish solutions far from true Pareto front. Accuracy PI influenced by distribution & spread: ranks for S1, S2, S5, S6 are different.
7
Conclusion No single existing PI is able to account for all aspects of the quality of solution sets for multi-objective optimization problems!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.