Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016"— Presentation transcript:

1 Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016
Recent results and future prospects of the decay pion spectroscopy for new mass determination of light hypernuclei 2016/3/2

2 Recent progresses & Feasure prospects
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Contents Introduction Hypernuclear BΛ determination New experimental method “decay pion spectroscopy” Experiments Apparatus Data taking Result in MAMI2012 & MAMI2014 Recent progresses & Feasure prospects Beam energy calibration Pion spectrometer’s momentum calibration Summary

3 Hypernuclear chart & BΛ (g.s.) determinations
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Hypernuclear chart & BΛ (g.s.) determinations Emulsion in 1960~70’s a few 10 ~ several 100 keV w/ stat. error Λ potential, Σ mixing, ΛN CSB etc. sys. error is not clear (e,e’K+) spectroscopy in this decade a few 100 keV (total error)

4 Issues of light hypernuclei
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Issues of light hypernuclei ΛN Charge Symmetry Breaking (CSB) 3H ⇔ 3He mass diff. (strong) : ~70 keV [R.A.Brandenburg et al., PRC (1988).] Well consistent with theoretical estimation (ρ0-ω mixing effect) H 4 Λ He 4 Λ p n Λ p n Λ 350±40 keV BΛ (g.s.) = 2.04±0.04 (⇒ 2.12±0.01) BΛ (g.s.) = 2.39±0.03 BΛ (1+) = 1.24±0.06 (⇒ 0.93±0.03) BΛ (1+) = 0.95±0.04 [M.Juric et al., NPB 52 (1973) 1.] [M.Bedjidian et al., PLB62(1976)467.] [M.Bedjidian et al., PRL83 (1979) 252.] [M.Kawachi Doctoral thesis (1997).] [T.O.Yamamoto et al. PRL.] Large symmetry breaking in ground state Spin dependent Systematic BΛ shift of 12ΛC [T.Gogami et al., arXiv: ] Short lifetime of 3ΛH

5 New technique “Decay Pion Spectroscopy”
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 New technique “Decay Pion Spectroscopy” e - γ* p Kaon tag K+ Fragments M π- , p π- Mnucl MHYP Pion spectrometer Λ π - Stop Two-body Decay Monochromatic Momentum MHYP only from pπ (high resolution) Electro-photo production (high yield) K+ tag for strangeness ID (background suppression) Hyperfragment

6 Measurable hypernuclei
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Measurable hypernuclei no 2-body decay 7Li 9Be 12C Measuring BΛ w/ same setup 4ΛHe → 4Li + π-

7 Electron beam accelerator Mainz Microtron (MAMI-C)
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Electron beam accelerator Mainz Microtron (MAMI-C) Beam energy : Max MeV Beam intensity : Max. ~100 μA Duty factor : 100% Energy resolution : ΔE~110 keV(FWHM) Beam emittance [vertical] : < 1.2π×µm×mrad (rms)

8 A1 experimental hall π - K+ Target Mover Spek-C Spek-A Spek-C
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Kaos Spek-A Spek-C to photon dump e – beam from MAMI to dump Target π - K+ ~2 m A1 experimental hall Target Mover Vacuum Chamber Frame Spek-C Beam To Kaos 12C, 181Ta 9Be (125μm, 250μm)

9 Pion spectrometers (Spek-A, Spek-C)
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Pion spectrometers (Spek-A, Spek-C) 1m Spek-A Gas Cherenkov Scintillation Counter π- Drift Chamber Spek-A Spek-C Mom. Accept MeV/c MeV/c Angle +90° -126° Mom. res Δp/p ~ 10-4 (rms) Solid angle 28 msr

10 Momentum Calibration Elastic scattering 12C, 181Ta AZ(e,e’)AZ
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Momentum Calibration Elastic scattering AZ(e,e’)AZ MeV 12C, 181Ta 𝐸 𝑒′ = 𝐸 𝑒 1+ 𝐸 𝑒 𝑀 𝑡𝑎𝑟 (1−cos⁡( 𝜃 𝑒 )) 52.00° Energy differences of scattered electron 181Ta 6μm target Function : Landau Gauss + linear FWHM : 200 keV/c 𝐸 𝑒′ 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐. − 𝐸 𝑒 ′ [𝑒𝑥𝑝.] (MeV/c) Momentum calibration Peak shape

11 Kaon tagger (Kaos) e+, π+, K+, p TOF2 (H) AC1 AC2 TOF1 (G&I) Lead wall
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Kaon tagger (Kaos) TOF2 (H) AC1 TOF1 (G&I) AC2 1m e+, π+, K+, p Lead wall Mom. Accept 600~1200 MeV/c Angle ~0° Solid angle ~ 15 msr K+ survival ratio ~ 40% Kaos Magnet

12 Data taking Pilot experiment MAMI 2012 MAMI 2014 Terms
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Data taking Pilot experiment MAMI 2012 MAMI 2014 Terms 25 May – 14 Jun, 19 Jul – 1 Aug 2011 24 Oct Nov. 2012 26 Jun. – 30 Jul. 2014 Beam current 2 μA 20 μA ~40 μA Kaos rate 1000 kHz at 2 μA 30 kHz at 20 μA 20 kHz at 40 μA Spek-A, C rate 2 kHz at 2 μA ~60 kHz at 40 μA Total charge 1.4 C 20.9 C C Calibration points - 181Ta : 2 points 12C : 1 point 181Ta : 3 points 12C : 8 points ×10 ×1/30 ×2 ×2/3

13 Decay pion spectrum (MAMI 2012)
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Decay pion spectrum (MAMI 2012) 1.5 MeV (FWHM) Peak significance : 7.9σ Width : 0.2 MeV/c (FWHM) → 4He + π - First observation of hypernuclear peak

14 BΛ = 2.12±0.01(stat.)±0.09(sys.) MeV Summary of BΛ (4ΛH [g.s])
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Summary of BΛ (4ΛH [g.s]) BΛ = 2.12±0.01(stat.)±0.09(sys.) MeV [A.Esser, S.Nagao, F.Schulz et al. PRL 114 (2015) ] F.Schulz, Ph.D thesis Consistent result with emulsion data Highest precision Systematic error from reliable estimation Consistent results between 2012 – 2014 runs Large BΛ difference 4ΛH – 4ΛHe

15 Progressing of decay pion spectroscopy
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Progressing of decay pion spectroscopy Large systematic error 4500 cm due to precision of e- beam energy in calibration run 2 cm much more precise measurement of beam energy is necessary. → Mag. field measurement Beam pos. monitor ~mid. Feb. 2016 > data points 5~50 mm steps [~10 μm precision] ΔB < 30 μT Stepping Motor + Hall probe

16 Progressing of decay pion spectroscopy
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Progressing of decay pion spectroscopy Large systematic error due to precision of e- beam energy in calibration run much more precise measurement of beam energy is necessary. → Mag. field measurement → Systematic study of pion spectrometers MAMI 2012 : 2×181Ta & 1×12C MAMI 2014 : 3×181Ta & 8×12C Reduction of systematic uncertainties 90 keV → a few 10 keV Calibration in 2016 Beam energy (MeV) Target No. of Mom. sets 180 181Ta + 12C 195 181Ta + 12C + CH2 210 9 + 9 225 8 + 8 450 12C 1 Different angular setting (53.5, 60, 70 deg) Different beam positions at target (11 points)

17 BΛ (4ΛH [0+]) = 2.12 ± 0.01(stat.) ± 0.09(sys.) MeV
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016 2016/3/2 Summary Decay pion spectroscopy of electro-produced hypernuclei New spectroscopic technique BΛ measurement with ~100 keV accuracy BΛ (4ΛH [0+]) = 2.12 ± 0.01(stat.) ± 0.09(sys.) MeV [A.Esser, S.Nagao, F.Schulz et al. PRL 114 (2015) ] First observation using this method Highest precision for BΛ Reliable estimation for systematic error Large ΛN CSB effect in A=4 hypernuclear system Improvements are on going Systematic error reduction Precise magnetic field measurement Systematic studies of pion spectrometers Next hypernuclear peak 3ΛH, 7ΛHe etc. Different target (Lithium etc.)


Download ppt "Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google