1. On assessing the effectiveness of supervision
Oslo
Hanna Ahonen
Tähän esityksen nimi/tekijä

2. Basic trends (in Finland?)
Less restrictive norms and regulation
More freedom to the service producers
More emphasis on individual client orientation
- Flexible iplementation of new innovations
Supervision by quality indicators /outcomes
Increasing integration of social and health services
Confidence on self monitoring
Decreasing resources for supervisory authorities
Tähän esityksen nimi/tekijä

3. Challenges Supervision should:
- Enhance and monitor (supervise) service producers’ self monitoring processes
Prevent adverse events in advance
- Ensure the quality, safety and accessibility of statutory services
Support the implementation of national social and health care strategies
Tähän esityksen nimi/tekijä

4. Effectiveness? To get maximum benefits on supervision carried out
Is the allocation of supervision appropriate
Risk analysis
Does supervision make any change
Is there a change
How wide and permanent the change is
Which part of the change is provided by outcarried supervision
Did supervision have any unintended consequences (positive/negative)
Tähän esityksen nimi/tekijä

5. Working group / report
A summary on means, methods and premises of effectivity assesment in different EPSO countries
Follow up
Databasis
Risk analysis
Indicators …
Tähän esityksen nimi/tekijä