Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends
Central Texas Commercial Real Estate Society September 14, 2011 Austin, TX Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
2
Growing States, 2000-2010 United States 281,421,906 308,745,538
Population* 2010 Numerical Change Percent United States 281,421,906 308,745,538 27,323,632 9.7% Texas 20,851,820 25,145,561 4,293,741 20.6% California 33,871,648 37,253,956 3,382,308 10.0% Florida 15,982,378 18,801,310 2,818,932 17.6% Georgia 8,186,453 9,687,653 1,501,200 18.3% North Carolina 8,049,313 9,535,483 1,486,170 18.5% Arizona 5,130,632 6,392,017 1,261,385 24.6% Population values are decennial census counts for April 1, 2000 and April 1, 2010. 15.7% of numerical change in U.S. Texas is the second largest state in terms of population (2nd to CA) and area (2nd to AK). In terms of number of people, Texas’ growth exceeds that of all other states between 2000 and 2010. Source: U.S. Census Bureau and 2010 Census Counts.
3
Total Population and Components of Population Change in Texas, 1950-2009
Percent Change Due to Year* Population Numerical Change Natural Increase Net Migration Percent 1950 7,711,194 -- 1960 9,579,677 1,868,483 1,754,652 113,831 24.2 93.91 6.09 1970 11,196,730 1,617,053 1,402,683 214,370 16.9 86.74 13.26 1980 14,229,191 3,032,461 1,260,794 1,771,667 27.1 41.58 58.42 1990 16,986,510 2,757,319 1,815,670 941,649 19.9 65.85 34.15 2000 20,851,820 3,865,310 1,919,281 1,946,029 22.8 49.65 50.35 2009 24,782,302 3,930,484 2,124,124 1,781,785 18.8 54.04 45.33 *All values for the decennial dates are for the indicated census year. Values for 2009 are for July 1 as estimated by the U.S. Census Bureau. Source: Derived from U.S. Census Bureau Estimates for dates indicated by the Texas State Data Center. Note: Residual values are not presented in this table. The components of change include natural increase (births-deaths) and net migration (in-out migration). In recent years, natural increase and net migration have contributed almost equally to Texas’ growth. Natural increase is much more predictable and stable than net migration. Net migration tends to fluctuate with economic factors.
4
Texas Business-Cycle Index
5
Texas Total Nonfarm Employment Quarterly Growth
6
Texas and U.S. Unemployment Rate
7
Texas Residential Permits and Mortgage Rate, 1990-2010
8
Estimated Annual Net Migration to Texas, 2000-2009
Migration into Texas has made very significant contributions to our population growth for the past few decades. International migration is estimated to have made significant contributions this decade. Generally, international migration is regulated and tends not to vary substantially from year to year. Internal (state-to-state) migration is estimated to have increased significantly in the middle of this decade and has remained relatively high. However, with the economic downturn, internal migration into Texas is likely slowed. Internal migration is not regulated by the government and is largely driven by the presence or absence of jobs and economic opportunity. Therefore, internal migration tends to be variable and dependent upon economic fluctuations. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates.
9
Percent of Migrants to Texas by Race and Ethnicity, 2000-2009
52% of all migrants were international (848,702 migrants ) (933,083 migrants) Sources: Percentages of domestic and international migrants by race and ethnicity derived from the American Community Survey. Total numbers of domestic and international migrants between are from Table 4. Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2009, U.S. Census Bureau.
10
Estimated Domestic Migration (2000-2008) as a Percentage of 2000 Population by County
This map demonstrates DOMESTIC, or internal, migration made up largely of persons who are citizens or legal residents of the United States. International migrants are not included on this map. Generally, western counties had U.S. residents and citizens moving out and the areas around urban cores had U.S. residents and citizens moving in. Note that Dallas and Harris county have net out domestic migration indicating that persons from these counties may be moving to more suburban adjacent counties. Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, March 19, 2009. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
11
Estimated International Migration (2000-2008) as a Percentage of 2000 Population by County
This map demonstrates in migration of international migrants. Domestic migrants are not included on this map. It is estimated that international migrants made significant contributions to population growth in large urban counties and along the border. Note that Dallas and Harris counties experienced substantial international migration resulting in a positive net in-migration to those counties. Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, March 19, 2009. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
12
States with Largest Estimated Unauthorized Immigrant Populations, 2010
Estimate (thousands) Range California 2,550 (2, ,750) Texas 1,650 (1, ,850) Florida 825 ( ) New York 625 ( ) New Jersey 550 ( ) Illinois 525 ( ) Georgia 425 ( ) Arizona 400 ( ) Texas has an estimated 1.65 million unauthorized immigrants. Assuming most unauthorized migrants were counted in the Census, this represents about 6.5% of the total population. Source: Pew Hispanic Center estimates based on residual methodology applied to March Supplements to the Current Population Survey (February 1, 2011).
13
Texas Racial and Ethnic Composition,
As of the 2000 Census, about 53% of Texas’ population was non-Hispanic Anglo, about 32% where of Hispanic descent, about 11% where non-Hispanic African American, and about 4% were non-Hispanic Other. In 2010, it is estimated that about 45% of the Texas population was non-Hispanic Anglo, 38% of Hispanic descent, 11% were non-Hispanic African American, and about 6% were non-Hispanic Other (largely of Asian descent). Source: U.S. Census Bureau and 2010 Census Counts.
14
Projected Texas Population Pyramid by Race and Ethnicity, 2010
This Texas population pyramid indicates that the portion of the population that is non-Hispanic Anglo is generally older than the other racial/ethnic groups. The portion of the population that is of Hispanic descent is comparatively young. This is also true for the African American portion of the population. Source: Texas State Data Center Population Projections.
15
Projected Texas Population Pyramids by Race and Ethnicity, 2010
This Texas population pyramid indicates that the portion of the population that is non-Hispanic Anglo is generally older than the other racial/ethnic groups. The portion of the population that is of Hispanic descent is comparatively young. This is also true for the African American portion of the population. Source: Texas State Data Center Population Projections.
16
Total Population by County, 2010
The counties of Harris, Bexar, Dallas, Tarrant, and Travis are the most populated in the State. Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, Hidalgo, and El Paso counties also have significant population concentrations. Many counties west of Interstate 35 are more sparsely populated. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Census Count. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
17
Numeric Change of Total Population by County, 2000-2010
175 counties gained population while 79 lost population over the decade. Source: U.S. Census Bureau and Census Counts. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
18
Percent Change of Total Population by County, 2000-2010
Population increase for Texas was 20.6% during this period. This map demonstrates the percent change in population over a ten year period. Percent change is one indicator of the speed of population change but is not always an indicator of the absolute change in numbers. For example, county A with 100 people added 100 people, and has a 100% increase. Meanwhile county B with 1,000 people added 100 people and has a 10% increase. County A is growing at a more rapid rate than county B, but in terms of total numbers, they grew by the same amount. The State of Texas grew by 20.6% between 2000 and 2010. Source: U.S. Census Bureau and 2010 Census Counts. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
19
Population Growth in Austin-Round Rock MSA, 1980-2040 (2000-2008 Migration Scenario)
County 1980 1990 2000 2010 2040 Bastrop 24,726 38,263 57,733 74,171 311,306 Caldwell 23,637 26,392 32,194 38,066 64,262 Hays 40,594 65,614 97,589 157,107 581,488 Travis 419,573 576,407 812,280 1,024,266 1,181,101 Williamson 76,521 139,551 249,967 422,679 1,363,538 Total 585,051 846,227 1,249,763 1,716,289 3,501,695 Y:\IDSER\Presentations\Texas and County Population and 2040 with and numeric and percent change.xlsx Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Census Counts; Texas State Data Center Population Estimates; Texas State Data Center Migration Scenario Projection to 2040.
20
Population Growth in Austin-Round Rock MSA by Area, 1980-2040
County 1980 1990 2000 2010 2040 Number of Inhabitants by Area Travis 419,573 576,407 812,280 1,024,266 1,181,101 Others 165,478 269,820 437,483 692,023 2,320,594 Total 585,051 846,227 1,249,763 1,716,289 3,501,695 Percent of Population in Area 72 68 65 60 34 28 32 35 40 66 100 Y:\IDSER\Presentations\Texas and County Population and 2040 with and numeric and percent change.xlsx Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Census Counts; Texas State Data Center Population Estimates; Texas State Data Center Migration Scenario Projection to 2040.
21
Components of Change for Austin-Round Rock MSA, 2000 to 2009
County Population Births-Deaths Migration 2000 2009 Change Foreign Domestic Bastrop 57,733 74,876 17,143 3,990 1,308 12,027 Caldwell 32,194 37,810 5,616 2,301 496 2,977 Hays 97,589 155,545 57,956 10,905 1,697 45,351 Travis 812,280 1,026,158 213,878 102,653 58,855 56,907 Williamson 249,967 410,686 160,719 37,705 5,965 116,977 Total 1,249,763 1,705,075 455,312 157,554 68,321 234,239 Y:\IDSER\Presentations\Texas and County Components of Change with FIPS.xlsx Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Census Count; Texas State Data Center Population Estimates.
22
Median Household Income
by County, Source: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
23
Percent of Population Less Than 18 Years of Age Living Under Poverty During Past 12 Months by County, Source: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 5-Year Sample Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
24
Projected Population Growth in Texas, 2000-2040
This graph represents variable population projections for the State under different migration scenarios. The base (brown dashed line) is the assumption of no migration. Under this scenario, the State will grow as a function of natural increase (births-deaths). The ½ scenario (the red split line) is the most conservative. The and scenarios reflect estimates of migration for those two periods and suggest more rapid population growth. Under any scenario, even no migration, Texas will continue to grow. Year Source: Texas State Data Center Population Projections.
25
Projected Racial and Ethnic Population Percentages for Texas, 2000-2040
The migration scenario is likely the most realistic to consider in short term projections. Using this scenario, the number of Hispanics will likely exceed the number of non-Hispanic Anglos in the State around 2015. Source: Texas State Data Center Population Projections, Migration Scenario.
26
Projected Population by Texas Counties, 2040
Texas State Data Center projections indicate that the most significant growth will continue to occur in the major metropolitan areas and along the southern border area. Source: Texas State Data Center. Vintage 2008 Population Projections, Migration Scenario. Map produced by the Texas State Data Center.
27
Percent Projected Change of Total Population in Texas Counties, 2008-2040
The Texas State Data Center population projections indicate the trends in population growth and decline will continue. Major metropolitan areas will continue to increase as will the southern border region. More rural, less populated counties will continue to lose population.
28
Demographics and Destiny
Texas is growing – with more people being added than in any other state we added 4 additional seats to our representation in the U.S. Congress. Texas is becoming more urban. Many rural counties are losing population. Urbanized metropolitan areas have been growing dramatically over the decade. Texas is becoming more diverse – much of our growth is attributable to growth of the Hispanic population.
29
Contact Lloyd Potter, Ph.D.
Office: (512) or (210) Internet: Lloyd Potter, Ph.D. The Office of the State Demographer and the Texas State Data Center are committed to supporting your work through providing you with the best, most accurate, and objective information we can identify about our greatest asset, the people of Texas.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.