Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byInge Darmali Modified over 6 years ago
1
Brief description of results on genomic selection of CIMMYT maize in Africa (Yoseph Beyene et al.)
Several populations each with 200 F2 x tester individuals genotyped with 200 SNPs and evaluated in DROUGHT and OPTIMUM environments. C0 200 F2 x tester individuals genotyped with 200 SNPs and evaluated in DROUGHT and OPTIMUM environments. Phenotypic selection of the best plants to form C1 Cross the C1, genotyped them, and make predictions to form the C2 plants. Cross the C2, genotyped them, and make predictions to form the C3 plants. Evaluated all cycles of selection together with checks, parents, pedigree, etc. in a field experiment.
2
Table 1. Mean grain yield performance (Mg ha-1) at cycle 0 (C0), cycle 1 (C1), cycle 2 (C2), cycle 3 (C3), F1, pedigree-selected lines and commercial checks for the eight bi-parental populations evaluated in four managed drought stress environments, and average grain yield gains per selection cycle including and excluding C0. Entries Across eight populations Three DTMA populations Five WEMA populations GY (Mg ha-1) AD (days) PH (cm) C0 2.286 63.910 2.410 63.670 2.212 64.060 C1 2.420 64.080 2.319 63.940 2.482 64.160 C2 2.438 64.410 2.378 64.830 2.474 C3 2.593 64.100 2.613 64.720 2.581 63.730 Pedigree 2.417 64.400 - F1 2.394 63.930 Parents 2.361 64.000 2.186 64.130 2.431 63.950 Checks 2.180 64.310 2.191 2.169 64.700 LSD0.05 0.219 0.700 5.260 0.342 1.130 6.900 0.257 0.850 6.320 Average gain per cycle (C0, C1, C2, C3) 0.094 0.090 0.960 0.069 0.404 1.720 0.110 -0.105 0.520 Average gain per cycle (C1, C2, C3) 0.086 0.010 0.150 0.151 0.390 2.450 0.050 -0.215 -1.250
3
Table 1. Mean performance for grain yield (Mg ha-1), anthesis date (days), and plant height (cm) at cycle 0 (C0), cycle 1 (C1), cycle 2 (C2), cycle 3 (C3), hybrid (F1), and pedigree-selected lines for all eight bi-parental populations evaluated in four managed drought stress environments, and average grain yield, anthesis days and plant height per selection cycle including and excluding C0. CML440/CML504 CML441 /CML444 CML444/Malawi 6x1008 6x1016 6x1017 6x1020 6x1028 Grain yield (Mg/ha) Cycle0 2.171 2.517 2.540 2.283 2.261 2.532 2.141 1.844 Cycle1 2.592 2.237 2.129 2.697 2.583 2.384 2.317 2.429 Cycle2 2.185 2.333 2.562 2.471 2.573 2.965 2.263 2.098 Cycle3 2.622 2.387 2.883 2.754 2.918 2.375 2.734 2.127 F1 - 2.28 2.957 2.120 2.436 2.177 Parents 2.133 2.248 2.181 2.635 2.464 2.446 2.4 2.214 Pedigree 2.47 2.423 2.456 2.327 2.413 LSD0.05 0.832 0.831 0.536 0.631 0.516 0.392 0.498 0.430 Average gain per cycle (C0, C1, C2, C3) 0.095 -0.040 0.146 0.119 0.192 0.011 0.173 0.052 Average gain per cycle (C1, C2, C3) 0.015 0.048 0.377 0.029 0.168 -0.005 0.208 -0.150
4
About 2.5 cycles of genomic selection in 1 year
with an average increase of Mg ha-1 per cycle under DROUGHT. This means about 0.173 Mg ha-1 of gains per year.
5
About 2.5 cycles of genomic selection in 1 year
with an average increase of Mg ha-1 per cycle under DROUGHT. This means about 0.124 Mg ha-1 of gains per year.
8
RESULT ON RAPID CYCLING SELECTION BASED ON MARKERS ON OTHER BIPARENTAL POPULATIONS
9
Across 10 biparental populations – OPTIMUM ENVIRONMENTS
Grain Yield 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 Group Cycle3 Cycle2 Cycle1 Cycle0 F1 Parents Pedigree Checks
10
Three cycles of marker only selection in 1.5 years
Across 10 biparental populations – OPTIMUM ENVIRONMENTS Gran yield (ton. ha-1)= Cycle Grain Yield (ton ha-1) 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 Cycle Cycle0 Cycle1 Cycle2 Cycle3 Three cycles of marker only selection in 1.5 years Overall genetic gain is times higher than from conventional breeding reported in sub-Saharan Africa.
11
Across 10 biparental populations – DROUGHT ENVIRONMENTS
Grain yieldY 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 Group Cycle3 Cycle2 Cycle1 Cycle0 F1 Parents Pedigree Checks
12
Three cycles of marker only selection in 1.5 years
Across 10 biparental populations – DROUGHT ENVIRONMENTS Grain Yield (ton. ha-1) = Cycle Grain Yield (ton. ha-1) 2.0 2.5 3.0 Cycle Cycle0 Cycle1 Cycle2 Cycle3 Three cycles of marker only selection in 1.5 years Overall genetic gain is times higher than from conventional breeding reported in sub-Saharan Africa.
13
Performance of hybrids developed through marker selection vs conventional breeding
Pop 5 - Managed Drought GY (t/ha) % P % C C3S2 2.8 24.0 40.4 2.7 18.9 36.3 2.6 18.7 36.2 18.5 36.0 16.4 34.4 Mean Pedigree 2.2 Mean of checks 1.7 LSD 0.7 CV 17.8 Heritability 0.4 No of Locations 1 Pop 5 - Optimum 7.0 15.2 31.4 6.9 14.0 30.4 13.0 29.6 6.6 9.8 27.0 9.6 26.9 6.0 4.8 1.0 8.1 0.6 4 Pop 7 - Managed drought GY (t/ha) % P % C C3S2 4.1 30.6 43.7 3.7 22.9 37.5 3.5 19.2 34.4 17.9 33.4 17.6 33.2 Mean Pedigree 2.8 Mean of checks 2.3 LSD 1.0 CV 17.3 Heritability 0.2 No of Locations 2 Pop 7- Optimum % P 6.4 8.9 12.1 8.8 12.0 6.3 7.2 10.5 6.2 6.1 9.4 5.9 9.2 5.8 5.6 0.9 7.6 0.6 4
14
HYBRIDS DERIVED FROM MARKER TESTED IN DROUGHT ENVIRONMENTS
SELECTION TESTED IN DROUGHT ENVIRONMENTS
15
Means of Hybrids, from C3, Parents, F6, Cross, and Check from two
biparental populations evaluated in 3-4 DROUGHT and 3-4 OPTIMUM populations MANAGEMENT Group BLUE GY BLUE GY Drought C3 4.008 Optimal 7.997 3.891 7.909 3.801 7.713 3.722 7.669 3.622 7.608 3.556 7.576 3.551 7.550 3.545 3.541 7.541 3.502 7.468 Parent 3.255 7.123 2.466 5.699 Cross 2.688 6.542 F6 3.525 7.325 2.761 7.219 2.781 6.505 2.645 6.885 2.022 6.566 Check 3.567 5.685 2.852 6.359 3.162 6.700 1.656 4.033 2.124 6.016 MANAGEMENT Group BLUE GY BLUE GY Drought C3 3.196 Optimum 7.089 3.119 7.059 2.614 7.037 2.490 6.932 2.415 6.867 2.375 6.840 2.371 6.825 2.365 6.797 2.359 6.795 2.353 6.767 Parent 2.267 6.383 1.963 6.183 Cross 2.307 5.913 F6 2.057 6.187 2.049 7.215 2.730 6.072 2.206 6.415 1.930 6.686 Check 1.871 5.038 2.291 5.827 1.246 6.533 1.376 2.929 2.036 5.347
17
Grain Yield Mg ha-1 Entry
19
Grain Yield Mg ha-1 Entry
20
Fig. 1i Grain Yield Mg ha-1 Entry
21
Fig. 1j Grain Yield Mg ha-1 Entry
22
HYBRIDS DERIVED FROM MARKER TESTED IN OPTIMUM ENVIRONMENTS
SELECTION TESTED IN OPTIMUM ENVIRONMENTS
26
CONCLUSIONS RAPID CYCLING OF GENOMIC SELECTION IN MAIZE BIPARENTAL BREEDING POPULATIONS WORK!
27
Thanks!!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.