Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Shyam Sunder Yale University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Shyam Sunder Yale University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Contract Theory and Strategic Management: Balancing Expectations and Actions
Shyam Sunder Yale University Conference on General Accounting Theory, Warsaw, Poland, June 16-18, 2004

2 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Overview The problem A contract model of the firm How firms work Role of controls Necessary conditions for firm to work What goes wrong? How do we prevent things from going wrong Concluding remarks 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

3 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
The Problem Identifying sources of success and failure is difficult Tendency to extrapolate the past Model of success yesterday, model of failure today Guiding framework for continual re- optimization of the firm in changing environment 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

4 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Examples of Failure Enron WorldCom Xerox Barings Bank of London was acquired for $1 by ING Bank Adelphia 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

5 Changing Labels for Senior Managers’ Challenge
Long term planning Business policy Strategic management Changing paradigms, metaphors, myths, lexicon? The essence of management does not change 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

6 Firm As a Set of Contracts
Among many individuals Shareholders Customers Employees Managers Suppliers Government Community, etc. 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

7 Firm as a Set of Contracts
12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

8 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Role of Individuals Each party contributes resources Each party receives resources Each party seeks his own goal through participation in the firm Firm’s goals are combination of individual goals 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

9 Individuals and Resource Flows
12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

10 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
How Firms Work Contract is mutual expectation or understanding Not necessarily explicit Role of social conventions Emphasis on symmetry 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

11 Individual vs. Organization Goals
Firm is like an arena or game In which individuals seek their goals Applicable to All Organizations Focus Here on Business Firm 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

12 Conditions Necessary for Firm to Work
Individual condition Each individual must expect to receive more than the opportunity cost of his contribution Otherwise individual has no incentive to continue his participation 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

13 Conditions Necessary for Firm to Work
Aggregate Condition Firm’s production function should be able to produce enough output from resource contributions to satisfy all the individual expectations Otherwise, expectations of some people will not be fulfilled, and they will quit the firm. If these people are necessary for the firm’s contract set to function, their departure may result in collapse of the firm 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

14 Questions for Reviewing Decisions and Events
Will it make any individual contracts infeasible? Will it make the contract set as a whole infeasible? Common element in organizational failures 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

15 Example 1: Feasible Contracts
Six contracting parties Opportunity cost of 60 for customer Opportunity cost of 10 for other five for a total of 50 Total available surplus = 10; feasible in aggregate Many individually feasible allocations of the surplus possible 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

16 Feasibility of Contracts
12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

17 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Two Complications Agents’ opportunity costs are private Manager does not know agents’ costs Except in special case of perfect market Agents have reasons to keep them private during negotiations Market imperfection means error in manager’s estimate of agent cost Agent does not know the total surplus Negotiation under veil of mutual uncertainty 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

18 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Privacy of Costs Uncertainty renders outcome less certain Uncertainty makes success in negotiation more likely Post-negotiation boasts or complaints leak information for the next round of negotiations 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

19 Negotiations are Sequential
Manager negotiates with agents, one at a time, in sequence Each deal brings new information, changes the remaining surplus This may change the negotiating strategy and even the production plans Picture changes continually 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

20 Changing Feasibility of Contracts
Internal and external events affect feasibility of contracts Senior management must anticipate these changes, adjust contracts and renegotiate them Long-term planning or business policy or strategic management 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

21 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Sources of Change Changes in factor and product markets Capital Labor Technology Product, customer preferences 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

22 Managing in Changing Markets
Pitfalls of relying on history and experience False confidence Wrong kinds of commitments Old contracts may become infeasible 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

23 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Effect of Changes Contracts of some agents become infeasible If the contract is still feasible in aggregate, management may try to renegotiate with some or all agents 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

24 Effect of Change on Contracts
12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

25 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Strategic Management? Anticipating change Redesigning the contract set to reestablish individual and aggregate feasibility if necessary Renegotiate with continuing agents Negotiating termination of contracts Finding new partners and negotiating their contracts 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

26 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Anticipating Change Most difficult part of management Easy to make others look silly ex post Success may make us less vigilant of our fallibility Mechanical projections from the past Value of time gained from foresight 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

27 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Famous Words  The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible.“ A Yale professor on Smith's paper proposing overnight delivery service "But what is it good for?“ Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, , commenting on the microchip. "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.“ Ken Olson, founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

28 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Famous Words Who the hell wants to hear actors talk? H.M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927. We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out. Decca Recording Co. rejecting the Beatles, 1962. Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy. Financiers to Edwin L. Drake, 1859. Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895. 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

29 Dealing with Uncertain Future
Statistical forecasting to use all information available in past data Delphi Technique to aggregate information available across individuals Scenario analysis to develop a range of possibilities to prepare for them 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

30 Redesigning the Contract Set
No unique solution Column 6 in Example 1 shows one feasible solution Interdependence demands understanding of the whole picture An example of aggregate infeasibility Requires a redesign 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

31 Example of Aggregate Infeasibility
12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

32 Redesigning Contracts
No obvious algorithm for redesign Search for alternative production technologies, agents, terms of contract Cannot assume that all agents will continue to participate Enough slack to deal with uncertainty during negotiations Continually adjust the design through negotiations 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

33 Renegotiating with Continuing Participants
Select who will continue Increased O.C. agents will demand more Decreased O.C. agents will be reluctant to accept cuts (fairness!) Asymmetry of information about O.C. and effect on contracts 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

34 Termination of Contracts
Some agents may not be a part of the revised set Unhappy agents can impose heavy costs on the firm Value of foresight in gaining time to deal with them 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

35 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
New Agents Find new agents in respective factor markets Distribution of “free” information to reduce frictions in factor markets Advertising in capital, labor and product markets The cycle never stops 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

36 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Summary Business unit as a set of contracts Agents seek personal goals Contracts define resource exchange relationships Individual and aggregate feasibility Internal and external changes disturb feasibility of existing contracts 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

37 Reengineering Contracts
Managers must anticipate change to buy time Reengineer and renegotiate contracts to restore feasibility Try to improve on design 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

38 Why Reengineering Fails so Often?
Over one half of such efforts fail Redesign is focused too narrowly to save costs Interests of the people whose cooperation is necessary for the success is ignored Many people see the reengineering effort as a threat to their jobs Deny cooperation, even sabotage the effort 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

39 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder
Concluding Remarks Failure to modify the contract sets to changing environment causes failure A strategic manager scans markets for changes, reengineers contracts to retain Individual and aggregate feasibility Failures without cooperation of people adversely affected by reengineering Contract model as a framework for thinking about and reducing such failures 12/28/2018 (c) Copyright 2004 Shyam Sunder

40 Thank You. Please write to: shyam. sunder@yale
Thank You. Please write to: Or, visit:


Download ppt "Shyam Sunder Yale University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google