Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT
Hydrography Skills Set Training Course No June 2012
2
AN EARLY HISTORY Originated in Ancient Egypt (3000 year s ago)
- monitoring of Nile River water level for flood prediction - approximately 20 recording stations (‘Nilometers’) were located - ‘Nilometer’ attached to temple walls, quays and the inside walls of temple annexes - units of measurement were ‘cubits’ (the measurement from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger, approximately 450mm to 530mm) - modern day methods of measurement have evolved from this primitive method of water level measurement
3
Options for Water Level Measurement
Manual Measurement Float Operation Submersible ‘Wet’ Pressure Sensor Gas Purge Operation
4
Options for Water Level Measurement
Manual Measurement
5
Manual Measurement Contact Gauges Staff Gauge
6
Manual Measurement The following example shows how depth of flow can be calculated by this method in a sewer. ZERO DIP DEPTH From a fixed point a measurement is taken to water level (ie the ‘dip’) This reading is subtracted from a known measurement (ie the ‘Zero’) Depth = ‘Zero’ – ‘Dip’ 6
7
Cantilevered Weight Gauge (Clear Ck at Golden, Colorado)
Manual Measurement Cantilevered Weight Gauge (Clear Ck at Golden, Colorado) 7
8
Maximum Height Indicator (Skokomish River, Washington).
Manual Measurement Maximum Height Indicator (Skokomish River, Washington). 8
9
Options for Water Level Measurement
Float Operation
10
Float Operation 10
11
Typical Shaft Encoders
12
Options for Water Level Measurement
Submersible ‘Wet’ Pressure Sensor
13
Pressure Transducers – ‘Wet’
‘Gauge’ Type (stainless steel) ‘Gauge’ Type (delrin/brass) ‘Absolute’ Type 13
14
Options for Water Level Measurement
Gas Purge Operation
15
Gas Purge (Open) System ‘Bubbler’
Basic Operating Principle dry nitrogen (or air) bubbled into the stream via a small diameter tube bubbles escape from the end of the tube (orifice) pressure transducer monitors changes in pressure within the tubing available as ‘single’ or ‘dual’ orifice/riverline options System pressure is proportional to water level 15
16
Pressure Transducers – ‘Dry’
16
17
Bubble Unit Operating Principle Uses ‘dry nitrogen’ cylinder
Provides a constant ‘differential’ of 3-5 PSI (21-35 kPa) above the pressure head at the orifice Differential maintains a constant stream of bubbles at the orifice HS23 bubble rate ‘pre-set’ at factory Eliminates risk of silicon oil entering ‘riverline’ ‘Quick Connect’ fitting available for check of bubble rate 17
18
Bubble Unit Typical Installation
18
19
Compressors Alternative to gas cylinders (Safety Issues)
Effective air drying system essential - moisture ingress - aquatic growth Some limitations – ‘riverline’ length < 200 metres - maximum head of 30 metres Low powered types available (12V: 38aH with solar) 19
20
Compressors – ‘Bubbler'
20
21
Gas Purge (Open) System ‘Bubbler’
Single Orifice / Single Line 21
22
Gas Purge (Open) System ‘Bubbler’
Single Orifice / Dual Line 22
23
Gas Purge (Open) System ‘Bubbler’
Dual Orifice 23
24
Old Style (Closed) Gas System
24
25
‘Hydrostatic’ (Closed) Gas System
25
26
Compressors – ‘Hydrostatic’
26
27
Ultrasonic Systems Ultrasonic pulses emitted by the transducer
Pulses are reflected by the water surface and reflected back to the transducer Time from emission to receipt of the signals is proportional to the level in the vessel Mounted vertically above stream 27
28
Doppler Systems If the distance between the transducer and the reflecting object is decreasing, frequency increases If the distance between the transducer and the reflecting object is increasing, frequency decreases Water level measured by ‘vertical’ acoustic beam Systems also capable of flow measurement 28
29
Radar Systems Extremely short microwave impulses are emitted by the antennae system to the water surface These impulses are reflected by the water surface and received again by the antenna system Time from emission to reception of the signals is proportional to water level in the stream 29
30
Laser Systems Changes in water level based characterised by intensities of angular reflectance of light 30
31
Comparison of Methods Method Advantages Disadvantages Gauge
Low cost option Easily installed Need to engage a gauge reader Manual data management Ongoing datum checks Weight Gauge Alternative to staff gauges Ongoing maintenance High installation cost Dipping Easy to set up Inaccurate in some cases Cost of electric dip tapes Float Minimal ongoing maintenance Reliable Accurate High establishment costs Environmental issues during installation phase ‘Time of Lag’ OH&S issues (working at heights, confined spaces) Pressure - ‘Closed’ Less expensive than float well installation Minimal maintenance Siltation effects Leakages not easily identified Pressure – ‘Open’ Proven and reliable system Widely used Medium to high maintenance Moisture and oil ingress Leakage Gas cylinder issues (safety consideration) 31
32
Comparison of Methods 32 Method Advantages Disadvantages Compressor
Eliminates gas bottle transportation and storage (safety consideration) Minimal ongoing maintenance High establishment costs Need to replace desiccant (in some types only) Ultrasonic Accuracy Reliability Widely used Easily installed Must be in a vertical position above water Dead Zone Effects of foam Effects of air movement Doppler Positioned on surface or bed of stream Proven reliability Bed mounted systems in accessible Radar Range < 35 metres False echoes Not suited for turbulent streams More suited to wide streams Affected by electro-magnetic interference Laser Range > 150 metres Accurate in turbulent water Vertical alignment above stream NOT required No false echoes Works well on narrow and wide streams Un-affected by electro-magnetic interference Requires clear line of sight Affected by fog 32
33
Questions ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.