Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPaule Bonneau Modified over 6 years ago
1
Risk stratification and skin testing to guide re-exposure in taxane-induced hypersensitivity reactions Matthieu Picard, MD, Leyla Pur, MD, Joana Caiado, MD, Pedro Giavina-Bianchi, MD, PhD, Violeta Regnier Galvão, MD, Suzanne T. Berlin, DO, Susana M. Campos, MD, Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, Mariana C. Castells, MD, PhD Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages e12 (April 2016) DOI: /j.jaci Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Approach to taxane reintroduction in patients with HSRs. In patients with an HSR with desensitization or challenge, premedication is generally adjusted for the next procedure, which is administered by using either the same or a longer protocol. Patients in whom the HSR does not recur are then treated with a shorter desensitization protocol, challenge, or regular infusion, according to the algorithm. Each procedure is usually repeated several times before proceeding with a shorter desensitization protocol, challenge, or regular infusion to ensure the patient's tolerance. Dotted lines represent procedures that were incorporated in the algorithm after September See Table I for a description of the grading of immediate HSRs and Tables E1 and E2 for a description of the desensitization and challenge protocols. SCARs, Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions include Stevens-Johnson syndrome and desquamative/blistering skin reactions. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Clinical features of taxane-induced HSRs. A, Immediate HSRs to paclitaxel. B, Immediate HSRs to docetaxel. C, Severity of immediate HSRs to paclitaxel and docetaxel. For patients with more than 1 immediate HSR, only the most severe HSR is represented. See Table I for a definition of severity grades. D, Delayed reactions to paclitaxel and docetaxel. Onset of maculopapular rash (median, 7 days; range, 1-15 days) and flushing (median, 0.5 days; range, 0.5-2 days) after infusion is shown. Other adverse reactions consisted of isolated pruritus (n = 5), dyspnea/bronchospasm (n = 2), and acute inflammation of actinic keratosis (n = 1). Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Management of patients with HSRs to taxanes. Patients were treated according to the algorithm presented in Fig 1. A, Patients with a positive or equivocal skin test response. B, Patients with an ST− response. C, Patients not skin tested. See Table I for a description of the severity grades of immediate HSRs. *Modifications made to the algorithm in September 2013 are shown as dotted lines in Fig 1. †See Table III for a description of patients with HSRs to challenge. ‡One patient had a delayed initial HSR, tolerated 3 regular infusions, and then had an immediate grade 3 HSR. On re-evaluation, she had converted to an ST+ response. The other patient had an initial immediate grade 1 HSR, tolerated 5 regular infusions, and then had a grade 2 immediate HSR. She was not re-evaluated. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 3 Management of patients with HSRs to taxanes. Patients were treated according to the algorithm presented in Fig 1. A, Patients with a positive or equivocal skin test response. B, Patients with an ST− response. C, Patients not skin tested. See Table I for a description of the severity grades of immediate HSRs. *Modifications made to the algorithm in September 2013 are shown as dotted lines in Fig 1. †See Table III for a description of patients with HSRs to challenge. ‡One patient had a delayed initial HSR, tolerated 3 regular infusions, and then had an immediate grade 3 HSR. On re-evaluation, she had converted to an ST+ response. The other patient had an initial immediate grade 1 HSR, tolerated 5 regular infusions, and then had a grade 2 immediate HSR. She was not re-evaluated. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
6
Fig 3 Management of patients with HSRs to taxanes. Patients were treated according to the algorithm presented in Fig 1. A, Patients with a positive or equivocal skin test response. B, Patients with an ST− response. C, Patients not skin tested. See Table I for a description of the severity grades of immediate HSRs. *Modifications made to the algorithm in September 2013 are shown as dotted lines in Fig 1. †See Table III for a description of patients with HSRs to challenge. ‡One patient had a delayed initial HSR, tolerated 3 regular infusions, and then had an immediate grade 3 HSR. On re-evaluation, she had converted to an ST+ response. The other patient had an initial immediate grade 1 HSR, tolerated 5 regular infusions, and then had a grade 2 immediate HSR. She was not re-evaluated. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
7
Fig 4 Risk and timing of HSRs in patients desensitized to taxanes: 138 patients underwent 940 desensitization procedures. A, Type and severity of HSRs with desensitization. *Six patients with an immediate grade 1 HSR also experienced a delayed HSR. B, Characteristics of immediate HSRs during desensitization (29 patients experienced a total of 47 HSRs). C, Description of delayed HSRs after desensitization (26 patients experienced a total of 44 HSRs). Onset of flushing in a median of 1 day (range, 0.5-2 days) and of maculopapular rash in a median of 1 day (range, 0.5-7 days) after desensitization. D, Timing of immediate HSRs during desensitization. †Patients who reacted during the first 5 steps of a 4-bag/16-step protocol are depicted as reacting at step 1 or less. E, Risk of HSR at each desensitization procedure. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
8
Fig E1 Taxane infusion at which the initial HSR occurred. Patients with initial HSRs to paclitaxel (n = 142) and docetaxel (n = 22) are shown. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
9
Fig E2 Patterns of taxane-induced HSRs. *In 5 of these patients, the immediate HSR occurred during carboplatin infusion and 1 hour or less after paclitaxel infusion. One patient had an immediate HSR 45 minutes into the paclitaxel infusion, which recurred 15 minutes into the carboplatin infusion. †In 34 of these patients, the delayed HSR occurred after a paclitaxel and carboplatin infusion. ‡One patient tolerated a rapid rechallenge within 30 minutes of the initial HSR but had a recurrent immediate HSR at the next cycle. §Eleven patients tolerated a rapid rechallenge within 30 minutes of the initial HSR but had a recurrent immediate HSR at the next cycle. Mixed HSR is defined as the occurrence of an immediate HSR during a taxane infusion followed several hours to days later by a delayed HSR. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
10
Fig E3 Comparison of clinical features of HSRs in patients with ST+ and ST− responses. A, Immediate HSRs. *P = .02. B, Delayed reactions. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , e12DOI: ( /j.jaci ) Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.