Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring"— Presentation transcript:

1 Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring
Workshop on the Quantum Dynamics of Molecular Magnets 4th December 2002 Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring Hiroki Nakano 中野博生 Himeji-Institute of Technology  Seiji Miyashita 宮下精二 University of Tokyo

2 Nanoscale Iron Clusters Fen
n= n=10 d electrons in Fe3+ S=5/2 L=0 [NaFe6(OCH3)12 (dmb)6] : monoclinic 単斜晶系 a \ne b \ne c, alpha=gamma=90degree \ne beta [NaFe6(OCH3)12 (pmdbm)6]+ : trigonal  菱面体晶系 a=b=c, alpha=beta=gamma \le 120degree or \ne 90degree Fe : monoclinic Fe : monoclinic Fe : trigonal n= n=12

3 Experimental Magnetization Process
Fe6 (Chaneschi, et al: Chem.Eur.J.2(1996)1379) J=28.7K T=1.5 K Fe10 (Taft, et al.:Am.Chem.Soc.116(1994)823) J=13.8K T=0.6 K

4 Pure Heisenberg chain including finite spins
Finite temperature T=0 Equivalent peaks with equivalent intervals

5 Experimental peaks in dM/dH
Fe Fe10 Width or Height What is the origin of the transition? Quantum transition due to lattice structure

6 Thermal effects in experiments of Fe12
(Ajiro, Narumi et al.:private communications) T=1.3K Satellite peaks appear. T=0.09K Satellite peaks disappear. What is the origin of the asymmetry?

7 Hamiltonian Heisenberg-type interaction Zeeman term Anisotropy term
Single-ion anisotropy Dipole-Dipole interaction Antisymmetric interaction

8 Lattice structure of Fe10
Local symmetry of each neighboring pair }→ Alternating branches of bonds in neighboring pairs → Details will be discussed later.

9 Lattice structure of Fe12
Deviation from the regular polygon Fe-Fe-Fe angle: 117.3~136.3° Neighboring spins D

10 Calculation method Dynamical simulation using an effective basis
The number of states is large. S=5/2 : 66= 610= 612~2 × 109 cf. S=1/2 : 26=64, 210=1024, 212=4096 The method can treat dynamical behavior. Dynamical simulation using an effective basis Numerical solution of quantum master equation by Runge-Kutta method

11 Calculations capturing thermal effects
:bosons  phonons Quantum master equation

12 Effective basis Lanczos diagonalization We use instead of . S=1
16 states from 46656

13 Result of dM/dH for Fe10 The origin is the antisymmetric interaction.
D/J=0.005, kBT/J=0.043 dM/dH Contribution of is small. The origin is the antisymmetric interaction. Increasing field Satellite peaks appear due to magnetic Foehn effect.

14 Mechanism of magnetic Foehn effect
Two kinds of speed characterizing behaviors of system Quantum transition is nonadiabatic. Energy Relaxation is dominant. The system is isothermal. Probability of higher state v Slow v1 v2 Fast Region of magnetic Foehn effect Spin temperature

15 Magnetic Foehn effect in M(H) and dM/dH
Probability of higher state Magnetization dM/dH → A satellite peak appear.

16 Experiments of Fe12 dM/dH
(Ajiro, Narumi, et al.:private communications) Second peak is the highest. T=1.3K Satellite peaks appear. T=0.09K Satellite peaks disappear.

17 Results of Fe12 J/kB=36K, D/kB=1.7K =2000, l=0.09 T=1.3K dM/dh h
Main peaks and satellite peaks agree well with experiments.

18 Consideration of lattice structure
Symmetry of Fe10 Inversion symmetry C2 symmetry Inversion center

19 Symmetry of Fe10 C5 symmetry Mirror symmetry

20 A set of D vectors from static regular structure
<yM|HDM|yM+1>=0 The DM interaction of the above D vectors is not the origin of the peaks in dM/dH.

21 Oscillation of methyl groups
Structure is measured at Tst=226 K. Each ellipsoid shows 50% possibility. Oblong thermal ellipsoids with the longer radius a Elastic constant of an elastic energy of a methyl group is briefly estimated as K ~ kBTst/a2.

22 Coupled oscillation of the collective mode
Hmethyl=S n=110 [-(h2/2m0)(∂/ ∂xn)2 +Kxn2/2+P(xn-xn-1)2/2] Fourier transformation & mode of wave number=0 H0= -(h2/2m0)(∂/ ∂q0)2 +Kq02/2 Zero-point motion due to the quantum fluctuation even at low temperatures -xZPM ~ xZPM : 50% possibility from the zero-point motion xZPM = 0.13 Å qZPM ~11 degrees

23 Schematic motion of the oscillation
Due to the above oscillation, the symmetries of C5 and mirror survive while the symmetries of inversion and C2 are broken . Alternating DM interaction is allowed. It makes the characteristic heights of peaks in dM/dH.

24 Case of Fe6 Lattice fluctuation has not been specified in Fe6.
Experiment Theoretical result dM/dH Lattice fluctuation has not been specified in Fe6. Fe6 may include other origins for quantum mixing.

25 [Fe(salen)Cl]2 Dimer molecule of S=5/2 spins
(Shapira, et al.: PRB59(1999)1046) Dimer molecule of S=5/2 spins

26 Summary References Quantum fluctuation of lattice Zero-point motion
Magnetization processes of nanoscale ring cluster of irons are studied. Main peaks originate from the lattice structure DM interaction in Fe10 DM interaction + dipole-dipole interaction in Fe12 Thermal effect from the lattice → Magnetic Foehn effect → Asymmetry of the peaks Quantum fluctuation of lattice Zero-point motion References HN and S. Miyashita : JPSJ 70 (2001) 2151 HN and S. Miyashita : J.Phys.Chem.Solids 63 (2002) 1521 HN and S. Miyashita : JPSJ 71 (2002) 2580


Download ppt "Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google