Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Did we get it right?.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Did we get it right?."— Presentation transcript:

1 Did we get it right?

2 What is this about? REFRESHED STRATEGY FOR PROTECTING KAURI
DRAFT NATIONAL KAURI DIEBACK MANAGEMENT PLAN DESIGNING THE MANAGEMENT AGENCY TO LEAD THE PROTECTION OF KAURI

3 Timeframes Accelerated changes to improve kauri protection (from Sept 2018) Third consultation round (November 2018) National Kauri Dieback Management Plan proposal approved (December 2018) Organisation to lead protection of kauri stood up (December 2018) National Kauri Dieback Management Plan in place (June 2019) Management agency operates (June 2019)

4 What we heard • Complex problem requiring a long-term solution.
• Urgent action and opportunity to be involved. Forest management is the biggest concern. • Local solutions and local leadership in response. • Mātauranga Māori and western science together. • There is a lot of good work going on. • Increased and sustained public awareness and education. • Community education and engagement are key.

5 The refreshed strategy

6 Secondary objectives:
Vision Ko te kauri he whakaruruhau mo nga Iwi katoa Kia toitu te whenua Kia toitu te kauri The kauri is the shelter for all people So that the land endures So that the kauri endures Goal Sustain the mauri and health of New Zealand kauri forests in the presence of kauri dieback beyond the next 1000 years. Primary objective: To reduce the harmful effects of PA on the environmental, social, cultural and economic wellbeing of New Zealand by preventing the spread of PA and minimising its impacts on New Zealand’s kauri, kauri forests, our culture, our communities and economy. Secondary objectives: To reduce the spread of kauri dieback. Maintain kauri dieback free areas. To reduce the impact of kauri dieback within infected sites. To reduce the spread of kauri dieback within, and from, infected sites. Locally eliminate kauri dieback within infected sites where possible. To protect kauri tree and stands with special values from kauri dieback.

7 What’s changed? Stronger emphasis on Treaty partnership.
Stronger relationships with iwi/hapu, community and local authorities. Creation of alternative walkways. Establishment of sanctuary zones. More funding for, and stronger focus on, mātauranga Māori. Bigger focus on tools for use on the ground. More closures and rules for restricted access to infected and disease free sites. Minimum standards for open tracks.

8 Questions What do you think of the objectives?
Are these the right priorities and right actions? Did we reflect the feedback from the first round of consultation in July 2018?

9

10 The NPMP Insert graphic from Capiche

11 Questions Should the plan focus on other pathogens?
Should the plan be reviewed every 10 years or earlier? Do you support the plan’s objectives? Do you agree with a risk based approach to managing the disease? Do you agree with the proposed definition of land zones? Do you agree with the proposed controls?

12

13 Values of the organisation

14 Criteria for organisation
Functions to protect kauri Biosecurity Minister required by law to consider Mātauranga Māori, science, research & development, innovation Compliance & inspections Capacity to manage plan Acceptability of organisation to funders & those managed under plan Accountability to funders Surveillance, reporting & monitoring Awareness, education, advocacy Additional criteria Corporate functions Empower & share knowledge Representative & inclusive Capability development Accountable & transparent Consistency nationally & variation regionally Interventions & treatment (controls, closures) Information management Futuristic Results driven with focus on excellence Coordination Adaptive, learn & critical to self to make a difference QUESTION: anything missed or shouldn’t be here? Strategy, policy & procedures Drive funding

15 Karanga ō te kauri - Voice of the kauri
What kind of functions need to be managed – locally/regionally/nationally? Who sits in governance? Are there bodies now that would work? What activities & decisions could be made by tangata whenua/NGOs/ community/industry/government agencies?

16 Is this the right plan to protect kauri into the future?
How to make a formal submission. Next steps – consultation round three (November 2018). What is happening now on the ground.


Download ppt "Did we get it right?."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google